[Bug bootstrap/56311] gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h: In function ‘_func’: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h:135:3: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘__extension__’

2017-07-22 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311 devurandom at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

2014-03-25 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 --- Comment #6 from devurandom at gmx dot net --- Did anyone figure out what's going on? Did the gdb log bring new insights?

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

2014-03-25 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 --- Comment #8 from devurandom at gmx dot net --- (In reply to Mike Frysinger from comment #7) it's beyond my (ia64 beginners) experience to track this down further i can certainly make available ssh access to interested devs ... it's a fast

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

2014-03-18 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 devurandom at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Target||ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug other/60465] New: Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

2014-03-08 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: devurandom at gmx dot net Created attachment 32309 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

2014-03-08 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 --- Comment #1 from devurandom at gmx dot net --- Created attachment 32310 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32310action=edit emerge --info

[Bug plugins/41757] Add PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL

2014-03-08 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41757 devurandom at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||devurandom at gmx dot net

[Bug libstdc++/56332] libstdc++-v3 does not support x86_64-pc-mingw64: No support for this host/target combination

2013-02-16 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56332 --- Comment #6 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-16 13:15:27 UTC --- Ok... I assumed that in the cpu-vendor-os triplet the os part contains the reference to the c library and/or kernel, while vendor refers to the distribution

[Bug libstdc++/56332] libstdc++-v3 does not support x86_64-pc-mingw64: No support for this host/target combination

2013-02-16 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56332 --- Comment #7 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-16 13:20:49 UTC --- P.S: Is relaxing the match to accept mingw*, because the library and compiler are called mingw(-w64), an option? That shouldn't hurt anyone and not make anything more

[Bug libstdc++/56332] libstdc++-v3 does not support x86_64-pc-mingw64: No support for this host/target combination

2013-02-15 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56332 --- Comment #3 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-15 10:37:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) For mingw-w64 isn't the triplet supposed to be 'x86_64-w64-mingw32'? Or has the 'old mingw' now grown its own 64-bit support? That would

[Bug bootstrap/56311] gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h: In function ‘_func’: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h:135:3: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘__extension__’

2013-02-14 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311 --- Comment #2 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-14 10:44:25 UTC --- P.S: I am willing to debug this further on my own, but I need some help. My first guess is that the files in include-fixed are system headers, which are somehow

[Bug bootstrap/56311] gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h: In function ‘_func’: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h:135:3: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘__extension__’

2013-02-14 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311 --- Comment #4 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-14 19:45:33 UTC --- Created attachment 29454 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29454 gcc-4.7.2-inclhack-hpux10_stdio_declarations.patch Attached patch fixes the issue

[Bug libstdc++/56332] New: libstdc++-v3 does not support x86_64-pc-mingw64: No support for this host/target combination

2013-02-14 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56332 Bug #: 56332 Summary: libstdc++-v3 does not support x86_64-pc-mingw64: No support for this host/target combination Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug libstdc++/56332] libstdc++-v3 does not support x86_64-pc-mingw64: No support for this host/target combination

2013-02-14 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56332 --- Comment #1 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-14 22:30:16 UTC --- Created attachment 29459 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29459 gcc-4.7.2-libstdc++-v3-os_include_dir-and-error_constants_dir-for-mingw64.patch

[Bug bootstrap/56311] New: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h: In function ‘_func’: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h:135:3: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘__extension__’

2013-02-13 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311 Bug #: 56311 Summary: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h: In function ‘_func’: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h:135:3: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘__extension__’

[Bug bootstrap/56311] gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h: In function ‘_func’: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h:135:3: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘__extension__’

2013-02-13 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311 --- Comment #1 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-13 22:31:03 UTC --- Created attachment 29446 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29446 cross-x86_64-pc-mingw64-gcc-stage1.log.xz

[Bug bootstrap/55886] gcc/configure.ac problems lead to GCC 4.7.2 not building for x86_64-pc-mingw64

2013-02-13 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55886 --- Comment #1 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-13 22:33:33 UTC --- Created attachment 29447 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29447 gcc-4.7.2-define-have_gas_aligned_comm.patch (In reply to comment #0) case

[Bug bootstrap/55886] New: gcc/configure.ac problems lead to GCC 4.7.2 not building for x86_64-pc-mingw64

2013-01-06 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55886 Bug #: 55886 Summary: gcc/configure.ac problems lead to GCC 4.7.2 not building for x86_64-pc-mingw64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug other/54956] New: GCC 4.7.2: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3435

2012-10-17 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54956 Bug #: 54956 Summary: GCC 4.7.2: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3435 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

2011-06-20 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #26 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-06-20 12:09:26 UTC --- Thanks a lot!

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

2011-06-17 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #22 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-06-17 11:21:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) Created attachment 24112 [details] backported patch Good. Then attached is the initial backport, I have just verified that it passes

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

2011-06-17 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #23 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-06-17 14:04:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) (In reply to comment #20) Created attachment 24112 [details] backported patch Good. Then attached is the initial backport, I have just

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

2011-04-27 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #15 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 07:45:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) Fixed on 4.5. Can it please be fixed in 4.4, too? (Maybe I am wrong, but I see only commits to trunk/4.6 and 4.5 here.)

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

2011-04-27 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #18 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 08:26:51 UTC --- P.S: Maybe you can backport it anyway, since I opened Gentoo bug #365045 [1]. Having the backport readily available from upstream would probably help including

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

2011-04-27 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #17 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 08:25:13 UTC --- This bug prevents Erlang 14B2 from building on my machine, so for me it is serious. Someone else has to tell whether there will be further 4.4 releases, of course.

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

2011-04-27 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #21 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 10:56:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) Created attachment 24112 [details] backported patch Thanks! I notified downstream, hopefully they will give it testing through a bump to gcc-4.4

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

2011-04-13 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 --- Comment #14 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-13 08:05:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Fixed on 4.5. Will 4.4 also be fixed? A release candidate for 4.4.6 was just released, so it should probably happen quickly.

[Bug rtl-optimization/43653] ICE: in reload, at reload1.c:1188 with -O1 -ftree-vectorize and empty struct

2011-01-03 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653 --- Comment #4 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-01-03 18:24:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) 4.5.1 shows the same issue when building Clang 2.8. Persists with 4.5.2.

[Bug rtl-optimization/43653] ICE: in reload, at reload1.c:1188 with -O1 -ftree-vectorize and empty struct

2010-12-25 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653 --- Comment #3 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2010-12-25 23:43:13 UTC --- 4.5.1 shows the same issue when building Clang 2.8.

[Bug lto/43659] -flto doesn't remember -fPIC

2010-11-30 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43659 devurandom at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||devurandom at gmx dot net

[Bug lto/46616] New: ia64: When compiling gcc with lto support: collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

2010-11-23 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46616 Summary: ia64: When compiling gcc with lto support: collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug other/42683] New: gcc manpage: Description of x86 -march not clear regarding mmx

2010-01-10 Thread devurandom at gmx dot net
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: devurandom at gmx dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42683