[Bug fortran/97692] GNU Fortran is not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97692 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-07 Status|UNC

[Bug libfortran/95293] Fortran not passing array by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/98175] Problem with gcc front end and ld on vanilla Windows 10 installation (spaces in path)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98175 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-07 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/97612] [F08] Structure constructor of type with nested allocatable array components fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97612 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/98141] Segmentation fault with empty string sourced allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98141 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/98129] Failure on reading big chunk of /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98129 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libfortran/95293] Fortran not passing array by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Could this PR be closed as INVALID?

[Bug libfortran/35014] Libgfortran.a (downloaded) is not PIC compiled...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The manual says: > On systems that provide libgfortran as a shared and a static library, > this option forces the use of the static version. If no shared version > of libgfortran was built when the c

[Bug fortran/97024] Overriding finalization on polymorphic types triggers ICE error in generate_finalization_wrapper

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97024 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/96839] gfortran thinks common_bits starts a common block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96839 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/94464] [F08] coarrays shoud be enabled by default.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94464 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/97612] Structure constructor of type with nested allocatable array components fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97612 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/30617] Implement a run time diagnostic for invalid recursive I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30617 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anthony.debeus at gmail dot com -

[Bug fortran/98046] lock in libpthread occurs with gcc-fortran and atlas-lapack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98046 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/98016] Host association problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98016 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I confirm that the test in comment O compiles without any error. However if I replace real y(n) with dimension y(n) I get the error Error: Variable 'n' cannot appear in the expression at (

[Bug fortran/97818] PDT Parameterized Derived Type fails with SIGABRT at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97818 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/97818] PDT Parameterized Derived Type fails with SIGABRT at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97818 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Confirmed from GCC8 up to trunk (for -O1 only). The code doesN't compile with GCC7.

[Bug fortran/97927] gfortran: ICE in lookup_field_for_decl, at tree-nested.c:288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >just checked with today's trunk and --enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl > working there. What was the failing version?

[Bug fortran/97927] gfortran: ICE in lookup_field_for_decl, at tree-nested.c:288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Dominique, are your compilers configured with --enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl > ? Only --enable-checking=yes (the default for experimental). My instrumented compiler r11-5060 also works.

[Bug fortran/97927] gfortran: ICE in lookup_field_for_decl, at tree-nested.c:288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/97896] [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:11156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-18 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/97864] Homebrew Operator Overload ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libbacktrace/97082] new test 'mtest' fails for Mach-O/Darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97082 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- At r11-5030 I get: = package-unused version-unused: ./test-suite.log = # TOTAL: 21 # PASS:

[Bug ipa/97757] [11 Regression] fortran save_6.f90 fails with a segv for -flto -O >= 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97757 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Reduced test: subroutine bar_array() logical, save :: first = .true. character(len=:), allocatable :: str if (first) then first = .false. if (allocated (str)) STOP 7 str = "ABCDEF"

[Bug fortran/97799] Passing CHARACTER*(*) var(*) through ENTRY causes segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Did you happen to run valgrind using the 10.2.1 build? Unfortunately I don't have valgrind on my new laptop (OSX Catalina). However I have run the test 20 times with 10.2.1 without any failure, whil

[Bug fortran/97799] Passing CHARACTER*(*) var(*) through ENTRY causes segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/97380] polymorphic array assignment for `PACK`: ICE and runtime segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97380 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-12 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/96655] [OOP] CLASS dummy arguments: Bogus "Duplicate OPTIONAL attribute specified"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96655 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/97300] [11 regression] several test cases fail after r11-3308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97300 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/97320] False positive "Array reference out of bounds in loop" in a protecting if block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97320 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/94625] documentation of _gfortran_set_options does not match implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94625 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/97084] Openmp + Allocatable String Crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97084 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-06 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/89219] ICE with derived type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89219 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at sourceryinstitute dot o

[Bug fortran/97037] ICE on user-defined derived-type output of an intermediate ancestor type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97037 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCO

[Bug fortran/96992] Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96992 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libfortran/97017] The function determine_precision is called twice for each formatted real write

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97017 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/97123] double free detected in tcache 2 with recursive allocatable type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97123 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/96910] intrinsic assignment does not duplicate allocatable component of nested derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96910 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-05 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/69090] Allocatable arrays mishandled in 'omp declare target'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69090 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Should not this PR be closed?

[Bug fortran/47469] Check whether arrayfunc_assign_needs_temporary misses TBP/PPC attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47469 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- No feedback after four more years!-(

[Bug fortran/80255] Segfault from accessing class(*) component in an array of any-type-wrappers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80255 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- No feedback for over three years!-(

[Bug fortran/92350] Document non-standard namelist quote handling in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92350 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-05 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/97031] the content of a comment line breaks compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97031 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-05 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/97176] Cannot return deferred length strings when using -fno-automatic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97176 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/96870] Class name on error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96870 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/96809] Duplicated module name in Fortran test cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96809 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-04 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/97224] [8/9/10/11 Regression] SPECCPU 2006 Gamess fails to build after g:e5a76af3a2f3324efc60b4b2778ffb29d5c377bc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97224 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I think the two attached patches are not pertinent: both tests use independent translation units, so they should compile. If I couple the TUs as in SUBROUTINE AIMPAC(ACO,AIC,EXPON,ICENT,ITYPE,OE,OCC

[Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/97245] ASSOCIATE intrinsic does not recognize a ponter variable the second time it is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/97242] Pointer assignment: Noncontiguous target to contiguous pointer wrongly accepted.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97242 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/97218] gcc/fortran/resolve.c:6807: pointless Assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97218 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Last r

[Bug fortran/97070] Discrepancy in results between OpenMP/OpenACC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97070 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-09-27 Status|UNC

[Bug bootstrap/97118] [11 Regression] r11-3274 breaks bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97118 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/97105] [11 regression] dumpfile.c:169:33: error: storage size of 'optgroup_options' isn't known

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97105 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug fortran/96859] Wrong answer with intrinsic merge_bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-31 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/96843] gfortran rejects as shape mismatch rank one logical array arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96843 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The code compiles with r11-2639 (2020-08-10), but gives the error with r11-2402 (2020-07-29). May be r11-2489 for pr96320.

[Bug fortran/96843] gfortran rejects as shape mismatch rank one logical array arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96843 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/96839] gfortran thinks common_bits starts a common block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96839 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Priority|P3

[Bug analyzer/96798] Analyzer failures on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96798 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 49152 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49152&action=edit Preprocessed file for the test_5 in memset-1.c

[Bug analyzer/96798] Analyzer failures on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96798 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Would it be possible to have a reduced test?

[Bug analyzer/96798] Analyzer failures on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96798 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > What does the declaration of memset look like in your headers? > (including attributes) void*memset(void *__b, int __c, size_t __len);

[Bug analyzer/96798] New: Analyzer failures on Darwin

Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: iains at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-apple-darwin19.6 Target: x86_64-apple-darwin19.6 Build: x86_64-apple-darwin19.6 On Darwin I get

[Bug fortran/96737] ICE when compiling module and submodule in same file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96737 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from Dominique

[Bug fortran/96737] ICE when compiling module and submodule in same file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96737 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/96724] Bogus warnings with the repeat intrinsic and the flag -Wconversion-extra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96724 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/96726] ICE with user defined specification function on assumed-rank array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96726 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patches have been submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054903.html and https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054904.html

[Bug fortran/96727] ICE with character length specified using specification function on assumed-rank array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96727 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patches have been submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054903.html and https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054904.html

[Bug fortran/96728] Fatal Error: Reading module inquiry functions on assumed-rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96728 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Another patch has been submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054907.html

[Bug libstdc++/96736] New: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++1998/all_attributes.cc on Darwin

Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: iains at gcc dot gnu.org, redi at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0 Target

[Bug fortran/96569] F2018 add EX edit descriptor support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96569 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/93727] Fortran 2018: EX edit descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/85836] [meta-bug] Fortran 2018 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85836 Bug 85836 depends on bug 96569, which changed state. Bug 96569 Summary: F2018 add EX edit descriptor support https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96569 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/96556] [11.0 regression] ICE via segmentation violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96556 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/96101] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96101 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Domi

[Bug fortran/93826] [OpenMP][OpenACC] Collapsed loop – code silently ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93826 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-06 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/96486] get_environment_variable fails for zero-length values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/96486] get_environment_variable fails for zero-length values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Could you please provide an example?

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug testsuite/96432] New test case gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90 in r11-2487 fails to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96432 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/95670] Fatal Error: File 'mod_intkinds.mod' opened at (1) is not a GNU Fortran module file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95670 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITIN

[Bug fortran/92191] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/85575] Acceptance of invalid code: ordering of declaration statements with implicit typing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85575 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/53940] Optionally warn about multiple explicit USE-association of the same symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87625] [OOP] (re)allocate on assignment fails for polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/94925] Undesired runtime warning message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94925 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/51591] Strange output from STOP statement in OpenMP region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51591 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/91902] "Where has __float128 gone" error during "making" gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91902 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITIN

[Bug fortran/90237] Bogus warning from -Wdo-subscript

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90237 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60144] Misleading error message when missing "then" after "if" and "else if"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60144 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89180] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wunused warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180 Bug 89180 depends on bug 92358, which changed state. Bug 92358 Summary: libgfortran/io/async.c:548:37: warning: unused parameter 'cmp' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92358 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/92358] libgfortran/io/async.c:548:37: warning: unused parameter 'cmp'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92358 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/45424] [F08] Add IS_CONTIGUOUS intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424 Bug 45424 depends on bug 53298, which changed state. Bug 53298 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/53298] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/56818] [meta-bug] fortran-dev bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818 Bug 56818 depends on bug 53298, which changed state. Bug 53298 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/96319] Don't warn for LOGICAL kind conversion with -Wconversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96319 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/interface.c 2020-07-11 20:06:47.0 +0200 +++ gcc/fortran/interface.c 2020-07-28 11:41:57.0 +0200 @@ -1466,8 +1466,19 @@ gfc_check_dummy_characteris

[Bug fortran/92703] VALUE attribute: CLASS and derived-type with allocatable components mishandled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92703 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Bother - I left the diagnostic line in the patch: > > + gfc_warning_now (0, "s1 %i s2 %i \n", s1->as->type, s2->as->type); > >Sorry about that What I guessed, but I still see (not new) /op

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- After fixing the ICEs by replacing 's1->ns->proc_name->attr.module_procedure' with 's1->ns->proc_name && s1->ns->proc_name->attr.module_procedure' I am left with two regressions: FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >