Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44715
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
--- Comment #5 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2008-10-14 16:03
---
Fixed on mainline
--
doug dot gregor at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2008-09-24 06:01
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg01667.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37553
--
doug dot gregor at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |doug dot gregor at gmail dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-03-27 15:10
---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00799.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31141
--- Comment #2 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-03-27 15:10
---
Does the following patch solve the problem?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00799.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31372
--- Comment #1 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-03-27 15:12
---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00799.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31140
--- Comment #4 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-03-27 15:12
---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00799.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31138
--- Comment #8 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-03-03 19:50
---
Patch is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00191.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30666
--- Comment #6 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-02-26 15:26
---
This looks like a straightforward fix to build_common_tree_nodes2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30666
--- Comment #3 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-01-29 13:50
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01828.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993
++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30571
--- Comment #2 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-01-24 04:36
---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is the normal problem adding a keyword in any language, I don't see why
C++0x 's static_assert not use a keyword in the already reserved identifier
namespace?
The C++ committee
--- Comment #4 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2006-09-12 18:27
---
It's a chicken-and-egg problem. Nobody on the committee wants to standardize
anything that isn't existing practice, but we only want to accept patches for
features that have been written into the current working
are not InputIterators
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
expressions
in return statements
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail
--- Comment #4 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2005-11-12 11:33
---
This is not a bug. TR1 3.5 refers to member function pointers, not member data
pointers as in the submitted test case. mem_fn has no result_type for member
data pointers because the constness of the result type
--- Comment #2 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2005-11-12 13:23
---
I don't know how to classify this. The basic problem is one that isn't
really solveable without rvalue references: you can't pass a literal
(e.g., 0) into the operator() of a reference_wrapper or any other
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc
--- Comment #1 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2005-11-12 13:31
---
Created an attachment (id=10225)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10225action=view)
Mainline (4.1.0) patch to test and fix this problem
The fix is trivial. The changes to the test case cause
++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21802
23 matches
Mail list logo