http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52488
--- Comment #8 from Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com
2012-03-13 05:37:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
../../../../../../gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302/newlib/libc/posix/glob.c:206:1: error:
allocating 2050 bytes of stack is more than
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37165
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51050
--- Comment #2 from Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com
2011-12-01 12:36:23 UTC ---
Johann,
Is this a duplicate of your bug #51345?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50733
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48715
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
--- Comment #5 from Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com
2011-10-20 14:36:01 UTC ---
Hi Johann,
I would prefer if the name of the address space for program memory be named
__flash so that way it is the same name as what the IAR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49903
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|AVR: Redundant comparisons |[avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881
--- Comment #1 from Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com
2011-07-27 23:13:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Created attachment 24848 [details]
Hack to set ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS
While looking at PR49864 I noticed some awful
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47509
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49807
--- Comment #2 from Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com
2011-07-21 20:12:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
This C source:
#define SPDR (*((char volatile*) 0x2c))
Hi Johann,
That's not quite correct. In avr-libc the header
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46278
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44506
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38159
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49491
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687
--- Comment #2 from Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com
2011-07-14 18:41:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 24758
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24758
Test case results using GCC 4.3.3 (WinAVR 20100110)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49629
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39212
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49017
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49017
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14118
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43690
--- Comment #9 from Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com
2011-07-12 02:58:20 UTC ---
Patches were committed some time ago. Does this bug need to be marked as
RESOLVED FIXED?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18145
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #14 from Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com
2011-06-27 21:49:18 UTC ---
Two things to consider:
. Regardless of whether someone votes to remove an option, a segfault
should always be analyzed. It's easy enough
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #10 from Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com
2011-06-27 05:43:20 UTC ---
Hi All,
Johann is correct in his comment to bug #46261 (below).
The -mint8 compiler switch is now causing the compiler to give an ICE.
We need
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48896
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37895
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42976
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37942
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
--- Comment #10 from Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com
2010-12-05 19:52:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Is R15 used anywhere else in startup code that might not obey the register
save
conventions (ie does do_global_ctors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44501
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46278
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
42 matches
Mail list logo