[Bug libstdc++/90276] PSTL tests fail in Debug Mode

2024-01-31 Thread frs.dumont at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90276 --- Comment #9 from frs.dumont at gmail dot com --- Here is the reason of the 20_util/specialized_algorithms/pstl/uninitialized_copy_move.cc FAIL. Maybe it fixes some other tests too, I need to run all of them.     libstdc++: Do not forward

[Bug libstdc++/111050] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ABI break in _Hash_node_value_base since GCC 11

2023-09-11 Thread frs.dumont at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111050 --- Comment #9 from frs.dumont at gmail dot com --- To be honest before that report I thought that preserving abi was just a matter of preserving memory layout of types. I had no idea that member methods mattered ! Lesson learned. On 11/09

[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map insert still slower than 4.6.2

2012-11-08 Thread frs.dumont at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 --- Comment #47 from frs.dumont at gmail dot com 2012-11-08 21:19:05 UTC --- On 11/08/2012 03:25 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > On 11/08/2012 02:56 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> On the other hand, the old-old code for rehash d

[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map insert still slower than 4.6.2

2012-11-08 Thread frs.dumont at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 --- Comment #46 from frs.dumont at gmail dot com 2012-11-08 20:21:15 UTC --- Attached patch applied to trunk and 4.7 branch. 2012-11-08 François Dumont PR libstdc++/54075 * include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable<>::rehash):

[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map insert still slower than 4.6.2

2012-11-07 Thread frs.dumont at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 --- Comment #40 from frs.dumont at gmail dot com 2012-11-07 22:02:56 UTC --- Here is the patch to fix the redundant rehash/reserve issue. 2012-11-07 François Dumont PR libstdc++/54075 * include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable