[Bug c++/99546] Weird return value of C++20 requires expression

2024-02-15 Thread gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99546 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Giese --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > The OP's example is supposed to be ill-formed though, it shouldn't compile > successfully. So I don't think it's fixed. That's my mistake, sorry. Yes the

[Bug c++/99546] Weird return value of C++20 requires expression

2024-02-15 Thread gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99546 Andrew Giese changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/113925] New: static assert on requires clause with non-type bool template instantiated with immediately invoked consteval lambda is incorrectly rejected

2024-02-14 Thread gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- template struct b{}; static_assert

[Bug c++/88434] operator< should take precedence over template argument in basic.lookup.classref

2018-12-11 Thread gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88434 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Giese --- It appears there is a CWG issue for this: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1835

[Bug c++/88434] New: operator< should take precedence over template argument in basic.lookup.classref

2018-12-10 Thread gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com
ity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Semi-related: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85570 Bug discovered here: https://stackoverflow.co