[Bug target/39457] [power7-meissner] unable to find a register to spill in class 'LINK_OR_CTR_REGS'

2009-03-18 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #5 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2009-03-18 12:48 --- Subject: Re: New: [power7-meissner] unable to find a register to spill in class 'LINK_OR_CTR_REGS' If possible, please send mail on power7 to meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com. I don't read mail on my home

[Bug target/4605] [alpha-osf]mips-tfile spaced directory names

2009-01-13 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #15 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2009-01-13 23:13 --- I suspect this needs to be solved in gcc.c with the specs handling, and you probably need something to quote the white space in filename, so that it doesn't break the file into separate arguments. Only some alpha

[Bug c/38416] New: c-parser.c puts pragma_kind as a 7 bit field, when 8 will generate better code

2008-12-05 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gnu at the-meissners dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38416

[Bug c/38416] c-parser.c puts pragma_kind as a 7 bit field, when 8 will generate better code

2008-12-05 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #1 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-12-05 19:17 --- Created an attachment (id=16833) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16833action=view) Trivial patch to fix the problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38416

[Bug libstdc++/38421] New: libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/ell_integral.tcc contains __ea identifier

2008-12-05 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gnu at the-meissners dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC target triplet: spu-elf http

[Bug testsuite/38025] [4.4 Regression] gcc.target/spu/intrinsics-1.c test fails

2008-12-02 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #4 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-12-02 23:26 --- Patch applied to tree on November 5th. -- gnu at the-meissners dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/38025] New: gcc.target/spu/intrinsics-1.c test fails

2008-11-05 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
/intrinsics-1.c test fails Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gnu at the-meissners dot org GCC host triplet

[Bug target/37841] New: SPU compiler is not complaint with the ABI

2008-10-15 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
). -- Summary: SPU compiler is not complaint with the ABI Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gnu at the-meissners

[Bug target/36936] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 138075 breaks cmove

2008-07-25 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #2 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-25 16:45 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 138075 breaks cmove On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 03:36:51PM -, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: --- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008

[Bug target/36936] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 138075 breaks cmove

2008-07-25 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #5 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-25 18:08 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 138075 breaks cmove On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:15:17PM -, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: --- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008

[Bug bootstrap/36918] [4.4 regression] Bootstrap failure on sparc: assertion failure in options.c

2008-07-24 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #2 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-24 18:26 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] Bootstrap failure on sparc: assertion failure in options.c On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 05:21:10PM -, ro at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #1 from ro at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/36918] [4.4 regression] Bootstrap failure on sparc: assertion failure in options.c

2008-07-24 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #5 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-24 18:49 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] Bootstrap failure on sparc: assertion failure in options.c On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:36:20PM -, andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #3 from andreast

[Bug bootstrap/36907] [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap

2008-07-24 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #16 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-24 19:19 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 05:49:02PM -, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: --- Comment #15 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-24 17:49

[Bug bootstrap/36907] [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap

2008-07-24 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #18 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-24 20:11 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:33:01PM -, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: --- Comment #17 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-24 19:32

[Bug bootstrap/36907] [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap

2008-07-24 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #20 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-24 20:21 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:14:35PM -, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: --- Comment #19 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-24 20:14

[Bug bootstrap/36907] [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap

2008-07-23 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #6 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-23 15:22 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:46:30PM -, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: --- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-23 13:46

[Bug bootstrap/36907] [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap

2008-07-23 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #10 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-23 19:06 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:46:30PM -, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: --- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-23 13:46

[Bug tree-optimization/36436] New: -ftree-vrp -O1 -msse5 -ftree-vectorize leads to segfault during garbage collection

2008-06-04 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
If I compile the attached preprocessed file with -O1 -msse5 -ftree-vectorize -ftree-vrp (or -O3), the compiler does a segmentation fault while garbage collecting. If I use the -fno-tree-vrp switch, the program compiles fine, even with -O3. (gdb) r -O1 -msse5 -ftree-vectorize -ftree-vrp sse5.i

[Bug tree-optimization/36436] -ftree-vrp -O1 -msse5 -ftree-vectorize leads to segfault during garbage collection

2008-06-04 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #1 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-06-04 19:36 --- Created an attachment (id=15719) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15719action=view) Preprocessed source code that shows the problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36436

[Bug target/36224] New: vec_widen_smult_{hi,lo}_v4si generates pmuludq instruction

2008-05-12 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gnu at the-meissners dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug target/36224] vec_widen_smult_{hi,lo}_v4si generates pmuludq instruction

2008-05-12 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #1 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-05-12 20:00 --- Created an attachment (id=15631) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15631action=view) Test case for bug 36224 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36224

[Bug regression/36039] New: -ftree-vectorize aborts on simple integer multiply vectorization

2008-04-24 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
Component: regression AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gnu at the-meissners dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug regression/36039] -ftree-vectorize aborts on simple integer multiply vectorization

2008-04-24 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Comment #1 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-04-24 21:49 --- Created an attachment (id=15528) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15528action=view) This is the test case that fails. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36039

[Bug target/22599] ICE with invalid asm usage

2005-07-21 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Additional Comments From gnu at the-meissners dot org 2005-07-22 03:54 --- I forgot to mention, the patch was against the mainline, sources current as of July 20th. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22599

[Bug target/15397] [g77] c float function called from fortran gives wrong result

2005-07-06 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Additional Comments From gnu at the-meissners dot org 2005-07-06 19:22 --- FWIW, I tried this with the 4.0 compiler on an AMD64 system, and it doesn't fail with gfortran. I did bring over the 3.4.4 release, and tried it with g77, and it failed as reported. It passed if I used -m32

[Bug rtl-optimization/17692] gcc -O hangs on glnxa64

2005-07-06 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Additional Comments From gnu at the-meissners dot org 2005-07-06 20:59 --- 3.4.4 compiles the file fine on a machine with 2 gigabytes of local memory. It may be that the machine you were using is thrashing itself to death. 4.0.0 and 4.0.1-20050702 both give the following error

[Bug rtl-optimization/17692] gcc -O hangs on glnxa64

2005-07-06 Thread gnu at the-meissners dot org
--- Additional Comments From gnu at the-meissners dot org 2005-07-06 21:46 --- I compiled the sample on 3.3.6, and it did appear to hang. The memory usage wasn't that much, so it doesn't look like page faulting itself to death. The last phase that dumps its output with -da is 18.life