--- Comment #7 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 20:59 ---
Subject: Bug 42454
Author: grosser
Date: Mon Jun 7 20:59:33 2010
New Revision: 160403
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=160403
Log:
Merge some commits missed during a merge from mainline in Dez
--- Comment #8 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 20:59 ---
Subject: Bug 42093
Author: grosser
Date: Mon Jun 7 20:59:33 2010
New Revision: 160403
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=160403
Log:
Merge some commits missed during a merge from mainline in Dez
--- Comment #14 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 20:59
---
Subject: Bug 40887
Author: grosser
Date: Mon Jun 7 20:59:33 2010
New Revision: 160403
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=160403
Log:
Merge some commits missed during a merge from mainline
--- Comment #6 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 00:42 ---
I believe this commit introduced the bug:
Remove COMPONENT_REF limitation in SCoP detection.
2010-01-08 Sebastian Pop sebastian@amd.com
* graphite-scop-detection.c (exclude_component_ref
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |grosser at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42339
--- Comment #6 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-30 22:08 ---
Subject: Bug 42130
Author: grosser
Date: Mon Nov 30 22:07:59 2009
New Revision: 154849
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154849
Log:
Protect loops that might be executed zero times.
2009-11-23
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-23 13:02 ---
Subject: Bug 42130
Author: grosser
Date: Mon Nov 23 13:02:08 2009
New Revision: 154440
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154440
Log:
Protect loops that might be executed zero times.
2009-11-23
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-22 18:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=19086)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19086action=view)
First try - Needs cleanup
I got a patch that fixes both the small C++ testcase and the dealII. It needs
just
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-21 08:32 ---
Li,
Is this bug solved with a newer cloog version?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41924
: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42130
--- Comment #1 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-21 08:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=19071)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19071action=view)
Small C++ testcase showing the same behavior
-O2 -fno-tree-ch are required options
Fails on execution
--- Comment #4 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-30 20:46 ---
Hi Li,
yes great work. I will commit it as soon as the copyright stuff is done.
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39568
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 38494
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38499
--- Comment #1 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-12 01:15 ---
Got a backtrace:
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x8ae3807 in %s, at %s:%d) at
../../../git/gcc/diagnostic.c:656
#1 0x081d2481 in fancy_abort (file=Could not find the frame base for
fancy_abort.
) at ../../../git/gcc
--- Comment #8 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 08:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=16869)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16869action=view)
Fix
OK. I got the fix. We had a problem with invalid CloogDomain data structures.
We did not detect all
--- Comment #10 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 17:35
---
Subject: Bug 38459
Author: grosser
Date: Wed Dec 10 17:33:58 2008
New Revision: 142653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142653
Log:
2008-12-10 Tobias Grosser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 17:39 ---
Hi, I can not reproduce this Bug on FreeBSD. May be it is just not detected.
Can you try with current graphite branch to see it was a duplicate of Bug38459.
Otherwise I will have to try it on Linux with valgrind
--- Comment #11 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 17:36
---
The last commit fixed that bug
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:08 ---
The graphite branch should now be able to compile polyhedron.
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:10 ---
Thanks for these test cases.
My commit fixed at least one failure, but there are more.
To help us it would be great to get a little bit structure in the failures.
Just get for every failing test a backtrace
: middle-end
AssignedTo: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 37894
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38459
--- Comment #1 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=16855)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16855action=view)
Add reduced testcase from mltfftsg.F CP2K
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38459
--- Comment #4 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:24 ---
mltfftsg.F fails on Bug38459
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38431
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #5 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 20:11 ---
*** Bug 37883 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37980
--- Comment #8 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 20:11 ---
Fixed in branch and trunk.
Now fails in trunk on verify_ssa(). This is already solved in branch and will
be imported to trunk soon.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37980 ***
--
grosser at gcc dot
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 20:17 ---
We get SCoPs that overlap each other. This should be easy to fix.
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 21:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=16853)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16853action=view)
Fix
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38084
--- Comment #5 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 23:35 ---
Subject: Bug 38084
Author: grosser
Date: Mon Dec 8 23:34:36 2008
New Revision: 142569
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142569
Log:
2008-12-08 Tobias Grosser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 04:44 ---
Subject: Bug 38084
Author: grosser
Date: Tue Dec 9 04:43:24 2008
New Revision: 142578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142578
Log:
2008-12-09 Tobias Grosser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 04:49 ---
Fixed in branch and current.
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 04:32 ---
Actually this should be open for everyone.
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|grosser at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--- Comment #5 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-08 19:46 ---
Subject: Bug 37883
Author: grosser
Revision: 141599
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Sat Nov 8 19:46:18 2008
--- Comment #15 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-08 19:46
---
Subject: Bug 37833
Author: grosser
Revision: 141599
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Sat Nov 8 19:46:18 2008
--- Comment #16 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-08 19:50
---
Subject: Bug 37833
Author: grosser
Revision: 141600
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Sat Nov 8 19:50:32 2008
--- Comment #6 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-08 19:50 ---
Subject: Bug 37883
Author: grosser
Revision: 141600
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Sat Nov 8 19:50:32 2008
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-04 18:25 ---
It seems PLUS_EXPR and POINTER_PLUS_EXPR can really handled identically.
So I will like to commit this patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37883
--- Comment #4 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-05 04:33 ---
Subject: Bug 37943
Author: grosser
Date: Wed Nov 5 04:32:16 2008
New Revision: 141597
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141597
Log:
2008-11-05 Tobias Grosser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-05 04:47 ---
Subject: Bug 37943
Author: grosser
Date: Wed Nov 5 04:45:49 2008
New Revision: 141598
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141598
Log:
2008-11-05 Tobias Grosser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-05 04:48 ---
Fix committed
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #12 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-05 05:05
---
Subject: Bug 37833
Author: grosser
Date: Wed Nov 5 05:04:29 2008
New Revision: 141599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141599
Log:
2008-11-05 Tobias Grosser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #13 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-05 05:25
---
Subject: Bug 37833
Author: grosser
Date: Wed Nov 5 05:23:46 2008
New Revision: 141600
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141600
Log:
2008-11-05 Tobias Grosser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37857
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |grosser at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 13:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=16588)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16588action=view)
Add POINTER_PLUS_EXPR - Improvement?
It seems we miss the POINTER_PLUS_EXPR. In most cases in tree-scalar-evol.c
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |grosser at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-29 20:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=16583)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16583action=view)
Bugfix
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37943
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 01:47 ---
Under FreeBSD x68 this works in trunk and branch.
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 04:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=16586)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16586action=view)
Add POINTER_PLUS_EXPR - Improvement?
It seems we miss the POINTER_PLUS_EXPR. In most cases in tree-scalar-evol.c
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grosser at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 04:28 ---
(From update of attachment 16586)
This patch was thought for another bug.
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-29 04:37 ---
Fix committed.
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |grosser at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-23 20:04 ---
Subject: Bug 37886
Author: grosser
Date: Thu Oct 23 20:02:59 2008
New Revision: 141328
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141328
Log:
2008-10-23 Tobias Grosser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-23 20:09 ---
It seems we do not have implemented all cases in expand_scalar_variables_expr()
Backtrace for f951 -O2 -fgraphite-identity.
#1 0x081f3461 in fancy_abort (file=Could not find the frame base for
fancy_abort
--- Comment #4 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-23 20:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=16534)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16534action=view)
Testcase fails because of missing INDIRECT_REF
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x8ae0d27 in %s, at %s:%d
in
create_single_entry_edge
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 20:05 ---
Polyhedron also fails with this bug in, if you use -fgraphite-identity in the
graphite branch.
bug.f90: In function 'sw':
bug.f90:6: internal compiler error: in expand_scalar_variables_expr, at
graphite.c:3618
--
Summary: [graphite] Polyhedron is not compiling (Summary)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 21:18 ---
Here a backtrace for copy_data.c:
#0 0x08194e97 in create_empty_loop_on_edge (entry_edge=0x290c2ac8,
initial_value=0x29066ce8, stride=0x29066d04, upper_bound=0x29066d04,
iv=0x29106ec8,
iv_before
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 21:32 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Created an attachment (id=16512)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16512action=view) [edit]
Reduced Test Case
This test case does not work, as it is missing a module
--- Comment #1 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 21:39 ---
Update status details:
With -O1 -fgraphite-identity we have:
- No problems:
aermod.f90
ac.f90
air.f90
doduc.f90
linpk.f90
mdbx.f90
tfft.f90
- Fail in expand_scalar_variables_expr
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-23 00:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=16532)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16532action=view)
Proposed fix in gloog()
I added a fix for this SEGFAULT. But now we fail with:
copy_data.c: In function
--- Comment #1 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-16 05:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=16505)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16505action=view)
Fix loop_affine_expr to remove limit_scops () - This is a HACK looking for
smarter solution
Problem 1:
Scalar
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2008-10-01 17:16:46 |2008-10-16
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-14 17:55 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
It makes no sense to loop block single nested loops.
Using -fgraphite-identity (not yet commited) or removing the ifdef at
graphite.c:4915 the Polyhedron also fails with this bug. So
--- Comment #12 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-10 19:40
---
(In reply to comment #9)
Subject: Re: [graphite] Disconnecting exit edge in process of code generation
Commit 140746 should have fixed Bug 3. Can you confirm this?
This is a side effect of your patch
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37705
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-29 13:14 ---
Committed SVN 140746.
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-29 13:21 ---
Commit 140746 should have fixed Bug 3. Can you confirm this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37485
--- Comment #6 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 06:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=16410)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16410action=view)
The next version, no bugs in polyhedron
I would like to commit this patch, can you test if it works with SCoP
--- Comment #4 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-18 16:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=16355)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16355action=view)
Create single entry single exit edges for the SCoPs of the SCoP detection
Here is a idea how to handle
--- Comment #5 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-18 16:34 ---
I need to read the paper now. It seems I was not informed about any updates by
the bugtracker so I just got the information. Sorry.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37372
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-12 12:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=16302)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16302action=view)
Just a simple loop over an array
I can confirm this one using this simple test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37372
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grosser at gcc dot gnu dot
: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37375
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
83 matches
Mail list logo
