[Bug libfortran/24313] complex sqrt function does not return principal value

2006-01-25 Thread harald dot vogt at desy dot de
--- Comment #12 from harald dot vogt at desy dot de 2006-01-25 21:07 --- (In reply to comment #9) Patch for libgfortran http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg00626.html It is a useful strategy to use libm but... It seems that glibc has still problems with csqrt. See also

[Bug fortran/25513] New: ICE tree check using complex numbers and the -fno-automatic compiler option

2005-12-21 Thread harald dot vogt at desy dot de
Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: harald dot vogt at desy dot de GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug fortran/25395] New: equivalence to common block array broken

2005-12-13 Thread harald dot vogt at desy dot de
Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: harald dot vogt at desy dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25395

[Bug libfortran/25017] sqrt, csqrt may give a wrong result if real part of compex argument is zero

2005-11-30 Thread harald dot vogt at desy dot de
--- Comment #9 from harald dot vogt at desy dot de 2005-11-30 16:17 --- (In reply to comment #8) Subject: Re: csqrtf, csqrt, csqrtl Do you have a patch? Because I have no idea want you mean. libgfortran/configure already checks for the existence of these functions. glibc's

[Bug libfortran/25017] sqrt, csqrt may give a wrong result if real part of compex argument is zero

2005-11-29 Thread harald dot vogt at desy dot de
--- Comment #7 from harald dot vogt at desy dot de 2005-11-29 09:42 --- (In reply to comment #6) Subject: Re: sqrt, csqrt may give a wrong result if real part of compex argument is zero On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 05:05:12PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote

[Bug libfortran/25017] New: sqrt, csqrt may give a wrong result if real part of compex argument is zero

2005-11-24 Thread harald dot vogt at desy dot de
of compex argument is zero Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: harald dot vogt

[Bug target/15397] [3.4 only] [g77] c float function called from fortran gives wrong result

2005-09-08 Thread harald dot vogt at desy dot de
--- Additional Comments From harald dot vogt at desy dot de 2005-09-08 15:34 --- (In reply to comment #7) gfortran has changed the default! Looking in the gfortran manual the -fno-f2c is now the default and -ff2c will switch back to the g77 default. Therefore gfortran gives a correct

[Bug target/15397] [g77] c float function called from fortran gives wrong result

2004-11-23 Thread harald dot vogt at desy dot de
--- Additional Comments From harald dot vogt at desy dot de 2004-11-23 08:53 --- (In reply to comment #0) This bug is specific for the x86_64 architecture. On 32 bit architectures it does not occur. [lx64 16:27] ~/test/cernlib/x86_64 gcc -v -save-temps -O test1.f funct2.c -lg2c