https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #25 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
I received your patch but I have no idea how to install it - I have been
using Fortran off and on since 1963 but I am not a systems programmer.
My version of gfortran is
gcc version 9.4.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #23 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
Given what "undefined" means in Fortran, I see no bug now.
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 21:04:22 +
> From: jvdelisle at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #21 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
I have only one problem here, and it's with the f2018 standard seeming
to contradict itself in two places that both apply to this program.
12.11.1 begins "The set of input/output error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #19 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
Thank you. To make the outputs from my test program testdecimal.f90 easier
to compare when using different compilers, and to clarify where a reading
error happened, I have revised the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #17 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
On comparing that with ifort's result I think that the only remaining bug
is that if decimal='comma' then '.' is neither a decimal symbol nor a
separator (see f2018 13.6).
On Mon, 16 May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #16 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
I have now used ifort on my latest test program, which you should
already have, in the hope that it helps you. It printed this:
john@johns-laptop:~/Jfh$ ifort testiostat4.f90
Compiling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #15 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
Thank you. My test program failed to distinguish some bad cases from good
cases; a revised version of the program is below. The important change
was making both elements of x be 666 just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #11 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
Thank you Jerry. Commas as separators with DECIMAL = 'comma' may be
trickier because commas then do the job that decimal points normally do,
and they cannot act as separators.
Here is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #8 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
Thank you. Unfortunately I think you found some but not all of what the
standard says about semicolons as separators. You will recall that my
original bug report had a program compiled with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #3 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
Thank you. Of course the program did not compile with -std=f95 because
there was no decimal='point' option then. But with -std=f2003 or f2008 or
f2018, and with or without n = 999 before the
10 matches
Mail list logo
