https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103537
--- Comment #7 from Hedayat Vatankhah ---
An interesting part of the problem is that following calls:
sc2.CallSamplePrivate();
sc2.CallOverloadedPrivate(4);
sc2.CallOverloadedPrivate(4.0f);
both before and after using MakeFake<>() c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103537
Hedayat Vatankhah changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103537
--- Comment #5 from Hedayat Vatankhah ---
Oops, maybe I'm wrong. I forgot that I've also wrapped
SampleClass::SamplePrivate, so let me investigate further. Sorry for the
inconvenience.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103537
--- Comment #4 from Hedayat Vatankhah ---
Well, sorry if I should gave more logs to make it more clear.
Note that the crash happens here:
https://github.com/hedayat/powerfake/blob/a4c80d6628816656796d2e85b4422218da05ce00/powerfake.h#L257
And t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103537
--- Comment #2 from Hedayat Vatankhah ---
With these options, the code runs a bit more but still crashes. The output of
each option is given below:
Output with -fsanitize=undefined:
/home/hedayat/Projects/powerfake/powerfake.h:257:40: runtime e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103537
Bug ID: 103537
Summary: Using -fstack-protector-strong "without" optimization
cause segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101010
--- Comment #2 from Hedayat Vatankhah ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> Does the type_info::name() string match what you're looking for?
No, not at all. Looks like I've not clearly described my intent.
First of all, type_info::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101010
Bug ID: 101010
Summary: Feature request: add builtins to provide mangled
symbols, optionally with a prefix
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
