[Bug debug/50279] [4.7 Regression] ICE while building the go front-end with LTO enabled

2011-09-15 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50279 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug c++/50365] [4.7 Regression] non-static data member error on valid code

2011-09-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-09-13 22:54:56 UTC --- Test case from Comment 4 compiles fine at r175670, but fails at r175671 with... [MacPro:~] howarth% /Users/howarth/dist/bin/g++ -c test.cc test.cc

[Bug c++/50365] [4.7 Regression] non-static data member error on valid code

2011-09-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-09-13 23:15:17 UTC --- At r176120 which fixed PR49691, the test case from Comment 4, begins to fail in the current mode... [MacPro:~] howarth% /Users/howarth/dist/bin/g++ -c

[Bug c++/50365] New: invalid use of non-static data member not suppressed by -fpermissive

2011-09-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365 Bug #: 50365 Summary: invalid use of non-static data member not suppressed by -fpermissive Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c++/50365] invalid use of non-static data member not suppressed by -fpermissive

2011-09-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-09-12 13:32:16 UTC --- Bzip2 compressed preprocessed source file for common/xplorSimulation.cc attached to reproduce the failure with... [MacPro:~/xplor-nih-2.27/common

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 if building Ada

2011-09-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 with recent GCCs

2011-09-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-09-09 16:11:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Nothing to do with Ada per se. Other than only building ada triggers the bug. Should an separate enhancement request PR

[Bug go/46986] Go is not supported on Darwin

2011-09-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986 --- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-09-04 17:29:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Created attachment 25177 [details] import-export.diff Just the import/export changes, i.e. outside libgo directory

[Bug go/46986] Go is not supported on Darwin

2011-09-01 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #40 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-11 12:47:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #39) ... unless you can produce a patch (or identify a plan for such a patch) that would obviate the need for common symbols

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #41 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-11 13:22:46 UTC --- Note that I can also confirm the failure from Comment 4 on darwin11. Using unpatched gcc trunk svn at r177665 when building with clang on darwin11 using

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #44 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-11 14:28:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #42) Ick. Oh well. Ok, how about outright removing for all darwin releases the -c setting? I think the only thing this could

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #46 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-11 17:19:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #45) Jack or the Ada folks might have a pointer. google turns up http://aadl.enst.fr/ocarina/releases/, if you have ppc

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #47 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-11 23:06:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #43) Changing the topic to target - although there's a latent issue with the two diagnostic implemenations, (and I will post

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #48 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-12 00:51:20 UTC --- Patch posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01083.html.

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #36 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-10 23:22:57 UTC --- Still broken at r177628 with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-08/msg00935.html and... ../gcc-4.7-20110810/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #38 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-11 01:25:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #35) I believe this problem has been fixed. trim_filename doesn't appear twice. Exactly what commit led you to believe

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09 13:52:29 UTC --- The radr://6320843, duplicate symbols from static libraries not properly ignored, has been open since 26-Oct-2008. I later opened radr://6733684

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09 14:19:34 UTC --- I wonder if addressing... http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42554#c15 would help such that the change in r157563 is extended to gcc

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #22 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09 14:35:18 UTC --- or more correctly just... Index: gcc/configure.ac === --- gcc/configure.ac(revision

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #24 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09 15:27:34 UTC --- Then you will also want to adjust the original toplevel configure change... Author: mrs Date: Fri Mar 19 10:19:52 2010 New Revision: 157563 URL: http

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #25 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09 15:30:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) and ... watch out for the first case matching all darwin ;-) and the second never firing. Why would you say that? I

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #31 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09 20:23:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) So, the fix is trivial but you guys are wondering in the weeds. Make the symbols unique and be done

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #34 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09 22:00:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) The patches are wrong, so, I don't favor them. The patch to fix this, is the patch to either boost things to -fno-common

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-08 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-08 17:45:03 UTC --- We seem to have... /* Given a partial pathname as input, return another pathname that shares no directory elements with the pathname of __FILE__

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-08 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-08 19:27:58 UTC --- This is radar://6320843 duplicate symbols from static libraries not properly ignored revisiting us... 26-Oct-2008 10:43 AM Jack Howarth: Xcode 3.2

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-08 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-08 22:59:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #10) This is radar://6320843 duplicate symbols from static libraries not properly ignored

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-08 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09 00:09:08 UTC --- Iain, I would also add that when I was trying avoid having to resort to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-08/msg01583.html, I found

[Bug debug/49901] gfortran.dg/debug/[pr35154-dwarf2.f/pr37738.f] failures on darwin

2011-08-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-05 13:39:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) works for me on Darwin9 Darwin10. Don't have access to Darwin11 as yet - but if someone could check it there. Works fine

[Bug lto/49992] New: lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 Summary: lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-05 17:12:16 UTC --- $ ../gcc-4.7-20110805/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.7 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/info --with-build-config=bootstrap

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

2011-08-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-05 18:52:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #11) Created attachment 24397 [details] Iain's work in progress for LTO containerization Sorry

[Bug lto/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

2011-08-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-05 23:21:36 UTC --- Confirmed on x86_64-apple-darwiin11 that the lto-bootstrap failure due to duplicate symbols in introduced at... Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 4 11:30:45

[Bug c/49966] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c execution timeouts

2011-08-03 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49966 Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c execution timeouts Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo:

[Bug c/49966] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c execution timeouts

2011-08-03 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49966 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-03 15:31:28 UTC --- Created attachment 24904 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24904 preprocessed source file for gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c on x86_64

[Bug c/49966] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c execution timeouts

2011-08-03 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49966 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-03 15:32:57 UTC --- Created attachment 24905 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24905 assembly file for gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45034.c on x86_64-apple

[Bug bootstrap/49919] problem with building gcc 4.6.1 on Mac OS X Lion

2011-07-31 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49919 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug bootstrap/49919] problem with building gcc 4.6.1 on Mac OS X Lion

2011-07-31 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49919 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-31 15:39:38 UTC --- The presence of... gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2335.15.00) from the output of 'gcc -v' indicates that is uses

[Bug bootstrap/49919] problem with building gcc 4.6.1 on Mac OS X Lion

2011-07-31 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49919 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-31 17:38:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Those instructions predate Lion which now defaults gcc/cc to llvm-gcc-4.2/llvm-g++-4.2 instead of gcc-4.2/g++-4.2. Again http

[Bug target/49909] FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo

2011-07-30 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-30 14:06:08 UTC --- How would I perform a cross-compilation in this situation? I considered that option but isn't cross-compilation designed for the situation when neither

[Bug target/49909] FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo

2011-07-30 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-30 14:22:07 UTC --- Also, while I don't have a Core Solo or Core Duo machine to test this on, I would expect this issue to exist on other i386-*-* targets. The default

[Bug other/49892] Error in configure test xgcc in x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/libgcc

2011-07-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49892 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug fortran/49901] New: gfortran.dg/debug/[pr35154-dwarf2.f/pr37738.f] failures on darwin

2011-07-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901 Summary: gfortran.dg/debug/[pr35154-dwarf2.f/pr37738.f] failures on darwin Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/49901] gfortran.dg/debug/[pr35154-dwarf2.f/pr37738.f] failures on darwin

2011-07-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-29 13:05:08 UTC --- The first failure, which is an ICE,... FAIL: gfortran.dg/debug/pr35154-dwarf2.f -gdwarf-2 -g3 (internal compiler error) appears as... [MacPro:gcc

[Bug target/49909] New: FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo

2011-07-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909 Summary: FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/49909] FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo

2011-07-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-29 23:35:46 UTC --- Created attachment 24867 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24867 config.log file from x86_64 multilib directory on Core Duo (non-EMT64)

[Bug target/49909] FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo

2011-07-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-29 23:43:12 UTC --- This section of configure appears unprepared for the possibility of compiling on i386-apple-darwin* with a multilib that can't be executed on the non

[Bug target/49909] FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo

2011-07-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-30 02:58:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Use --disable-multilib. Not an option for us on fink since the same packaging script has to both list the built shared

[Bug middle-end/47048] misc vect.exp failures with -fgraphite-identity enabled at -O2.

2011-07-28 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47048 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-29 01:54:25 UTC --- Checking the failures in vect.exp at r176905 with -fgraphite-identity enabled at -O2, we seem to have picked up a bunch for -flto at -m32 on x86_64-apple

[Bug testsuite/49741] make -k check-c++0x not multilib aware

2011-07-15 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49741 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-15 10:55:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) Created attachment 24772 [details] Patch to use --zadditional_options instead of --tool_opts

[Bug testsuite/49741] make -k check-c++0x not multilib aware

2011-07-14 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49741 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-15 02:52:39 UTC --- Comparing the beginning of the normal make-g++ from... make -k check-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}' ...which doesn't show

[Bug testsuite/49741] make -k check-c++0x not multilib aware

2011-07-14 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49741 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-15 05:31:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Created attachment 24772 [details] Patch to use --zadditional_options instead of --tool_opts Does this work better? Yes

[Bug fortran/49738] Compile errors on OSX darwin 11 (Lion)

2011-07-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49738 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug fortran/49738] Compile errors on OSX darwin 11 (Lion)

2011-07-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49738 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-13 22:21:38 UTC --- Also note that... 2011-06-19 Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu PR target/49461 * configure.ac: Use mh-x86-darwin. * configure

[Bug testsuite/49741] New: make -k check-c++0x not multilib aware

2011-07-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49741 Summary: make -k check-c++0x not multilib aware Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo:

[Bug target/44707] operand requires impossible reload

2011-07-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44707 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug target/44707] operand requires impossible reload

2011-07-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44707 --- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-11 03:07:34 UTC --- Created attachment 24734 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24734 preprocessed source for pr44707.c from powerpc-apple-darwin9

[Bug target/44707] operand requires impossible reload

2011-07-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44707 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-11 03:08:07 UTC --- Created attachment 24735 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24735 assembly for pr44707.c from powerpc-apple-darwin9

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

2011-07-08 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-08 11:18:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Created attachment 24712 [details] updated work in progress there were a couple of hunks in the previous from another LTO

[Bug libffi/49594] bootstrap failure in libffi:darwin_closure for powerpc-darwin8

2011-07-01 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-01 12:49:45 UTC --- He is using my proposed fink gcc46 packaging so it should be... ../gcc-4.6.1/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6 --mandir=/sw/share/man

[Bug middle-end/49536] latent bug with creation of vector of arrays

2011-06-27 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49536 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-27 13:08:38 UTC --- Can we get this fix backported to gcc-4_5-branch and gcc-4_6-branch as well? Dragonegg currently only builds against those FSF gcc releases.

[Bug middle-end/49536] latent bug with creation of vector of arrays

2011-06-27 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49536 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-27 16:46:17 UTC --- I can confirm that the adjusted backport of... Index: gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c === --- gcc

[Bug middle-end/49536] New: latent bug in FSF gcc with creation of vector of arrays

2011-06-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49536 Summary: latent bug in FSF gcc with creation of vector of arrays Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/49470] New: no matching constructor for initialization errors not detected in g++

2011-06-19 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49470 Summary: no matching constructor for initialization errors not detected in g++ Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49470] no matching constructor for initialization errors not detected in g++

2011-06-19 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49470 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-20 03:12:23 UTC --- This test case originates from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9627.

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

2011-06-18 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-19 01:51:46 UTC --- Can we also get r175182 back ported onto gcc-4_5-branch and gcc-4_6-branch?

[Bug java/49441] @LDLIBICONV@ lost from installed libgcj.spec

2011-06-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49441 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-17 12:50:52 UTC --- How is gcj supposed to properly find its linkage libraries on x86_64 linux when using -m32? Since only a single copy of libgcj.spec is installed and used

[Bug libgcj/49314] md5test, shatest output FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

2011-06-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug target/49461] New: boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

2011-06-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 Summary: boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug libgcj/49314] md5test, shatest output FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

2011-06-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314 --- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-18 05:54:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) Further investigation revealed part of what's going on: the test in gnu::gcj::convert::IOConverter::iconv_init fails

[Bug java/49441] New: @LDLIBICONV@ lost from installed libgcj.spec

2011-06-16 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49441 Summary: @LDLIBICONV@ lost from installed libgcj.spec Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: java AssignedTo:

[Bug java/49441] @LDLIBICONV@ lost from installed libgcj.spec

2011-06-16 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49441 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-17 00:09:42 UTC --- I don't believe r169822 is the cause but I see what is happening. During the build two libgcj.spec files are generated. One in x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0

[Bug java/49441] @LDLIBICONV@ lost from installed libgcj.spec

2011-06-16 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49441 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-17 00:16:55 UTC --- This same behavior exists for LIBICONV in the multi lib of libstdc++-v3... [MacPro:darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/libstdc++-v3] howarth% grep

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-14 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 --- Comment #28 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-15 03:15:44 UTC --- Created attachment 24532 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24532 patch to fix pie handling for darwin11

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-14 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 --- Comment #29 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-15 03:21:04 UTC --- While we are fixing the pie/PIE handling on darwin, we should also address a change required for darwin11 which defaults its linker to -pie. This causes

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-11 19:56:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) This patch bootstraps fine on x86_64-apple-darwin11 and passes -pie as expected... [MacPro:~] howarth% gcc-fsf-4.7 -fpie -v

[Bug c++/49083] g++ should error when a variable declared in a condition is hidden by a variable in the immediately contained block

2011-06-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49083 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-05 20:36:36 UTC --- Fixed at r174307. Now the provided test case properly errors with gcc trunk... howarth% gcc-fsf-4.7 hidden_bug.cc hidden_bug.cc: In function ‘int main

[Bug bootstrap/49275] --enable-build-with-cxx profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

2011-06-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49275 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-04 23:20:14 UTC --- This problem no longer exists at r174648 with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02301.html installed. A profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3

[Bug bootstrap/49270] New: make BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

2011-06-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 Summary: make BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/49270] make BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

2011-06-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03 00:15:47 UTC --- Configured bootstrap as... ../gcc-4.7-20110602/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.7 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/info

[Bug bootstrap/49270] make BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

2011-06-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03 00:21:47 UTC --- /* Read predicate from IB. */ static struct predicate read_predicate (struct lto_input_block *ib) { struct predicate out; clause_t clause; int k

[Bug bootstrap/49270] make BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

2011-06-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03 00:35:08 UTC --- Index: gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c === --- gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c(revision 174584

[Bug bootstrap/49270] make BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

2011-06-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03 00:36:36 UTC --- Opps, spoke too soon, the change in comment 3 converts the bootstrap failure to... /sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B

[Bug bootstrap/49270] make BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

2011-06-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03 00:50:08 UTC --- There already exists an unreviewed patch to fix this issue (which lacks a PR)... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02301.html it appears

[Bug bootstrap/49270] make BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

2011-06-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03 02:40:41 UTC --- I can confirm that r174593 with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02301.html (as http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02304.html

[Bug bootstrap/49275] New: --enable-build-with-cxx profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

2011-06-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49275 Summary: --enable-build-with-cxx profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug bootstrap/49275] --enable-build-with-cxx profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

2011-06-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49275 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64

[Bug bootstrap/49275] --enable-build-with-cxx profiledbootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3 failure

2011-06-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49275 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03 05:55:52 UTC --- This problem doesn't exist without --enable-build-with-cxx.

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

2011-05-30 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-30 15:16:25 UTC --- Created attachment 24397 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24397 Iain's work in progress for LTO containerization

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

2011-05-30 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-30 15:15:31 UTC --- I have been using Iain's last work in progress patch and it works fine with both gcc 4.6 branch and gcc trunk. Hopefully he can get back to polishing

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on several platforms

2011-05-30 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-30 18:52:18 UTC --- At r174446, lto profiled bootstrap works fine on x86_64 darwin.

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-29 15:12:50 UTC --- It is strange that regress is still able to bootstrap powerpc-apple-darwin9 with r174286 present. The powerpc-apple-darwin9 target also has... auto

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-05-27 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-27 18:29:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Ugh. I do not have time to deal with this problem at the moment. But I don't understand how ASM_OUTPUT_WEAKREF isn't

[Bug target/49184] New: r174284 breaks darwin bootstrap

2011-05-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49184 Summary: r174284 breaks darwin bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/49083] New: g++ should error when a variable declared in a condition is hidden by a variable in the immediately contained block

2011-05-20 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49083 Summary: g++ should error when a variable declared in a condition is hidden by a variable in the immediately contained block Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/48926] gfortran.dg/coarray/image_index_1.f90 -fcoarray=single -O2 (test for excess errors)

2011-05-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48926 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-12 22:20:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Dominique, I think you also have an x86_64-apple-darwin10. Do you also see failures - for instance with -m32? (In reply

[Bug fortran/48926] gfortran.dg/coarray/image_index_1.f90 -fcoarray=single -O2 (test for excess errors)

2011-05-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48926 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-11 10:28:40 UTC --- A clean tree at gcc trunk r173643 with a standard non-LTO bootstrap produces different failures on x86_64-apple-darwin10... FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray

[Bug fortran/48926] gfortran.dg/coarray/image_index_1.f90 -fcoarray=single -O2 (test for excess errors)

2011-05-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48926 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-11 10:34:36 UTC --- Also the failure... FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_20.f90 -O (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_20.f90 -O (test for excess errors

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >