[Bug tree-optimization/52091] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/52091] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/52091] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091 --- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2012-02-02 15:16:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) I think we should fail to vectorize D.2030_19 = prephitmp.17_21 65535, or any other non-phi

[Bug tree-optimization/52073] [4.7 Regression] ICE: vector VEC(vec_void_p,base) index domain error, in vinfo_for_stmt at tree-vectorizer.h:620

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52073 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug middle-end/51848] GCC is not able to vectorize when a constant value is also added to the sum of array expression inside a loop.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51848 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/51799] [4.7 Regression] Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51799 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/51269] Vectorization profitability threshold is not actually used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51269 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/51704] [4.7 Regression] ICE: vector VEC(vec_void_p,base) index domain error, in vinfo_for_stmt at tree-vectorizer.h:620 with -O3 -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51704 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/51704] [4.7 Regression] ICE: vector VEC(vec_void_p,base) index domain error, in vinfo_for_stmt at tree-vectorizer.h:620 with -O3 -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51704 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/51684] [4.7 Regression]: ICE in gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_5 on ia64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51684 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/51693] New: New XPASSes in vectorizer testsuite on powerpc64-suse-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693 Bug #: 51693 Summary: New XPASSes in vectorizer testsuite on powerpc64-suse-linux Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/51693] New XPASSes in vectorizer testsuite on powerpc64-suse-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693 --- Comment #2 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-28 12:27:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) I though that if {vect_aligned_arrays} isn't true, than arrays could be aligned even after peeling - that's why I added such check. Sorry

[Bug testsuite/51693] New XPASSes in vectorizer testsuite on powerpc64-suse-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693 --- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-28 13:11:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) In vect-peel-3.c we actually assume that vector length is 16 byte. Here is the loop body: suma += ia[i]; sumb += ib[i+5

[Bug testsuite/51693] New XPASSes in vectorizer testsuite on powerpc64-suse-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693 --- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-29 07:37:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Yes, vector_sizes_32B_16B seems to be ok in that case. Other two tests (vect-multitypes-1.c and no-section-anchors-vect-69.c) look like

[Bug tree-optimization/51684] [4.7 Regression]: ICE in gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_5 on ia64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51684 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/51606] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr51015.c (internal compiler error) on ppc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51606 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/51499] vectorizer missing simple case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51499 --- Comment #14 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-13 16:27:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) However, I don't fully understand Richard Guenther's example. Yes his example requires -fassociative-math to be vectorized, however

[Bug tree-optimization/51499] vectorizer missing simple case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51499 --- Comment #8 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-12 11:03:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) While investigating pr51597, I have found that vectorized loops in programs as simple as subroutine spmmult(x,b,ad) implicit none

[Bug tree-optimization/51499] vectorizer missing simple case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51499 --- Comment #9 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-12 11:13:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) In some cases it might be necessary but not here: sum1+=a; sum2+=a; gives exactly the same result as (sum1, sum2

[Bug tree-optimization/51499] vectorizer missing simple case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51499 --- Comment #11 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-12 11:27:26 UTC --- Right. We need to check that there is no load permutation.

[Bug tree-optimization/51499] vectorizer missing simple case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51499 --- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-11 08:48:24 UTC --- It gets vectorized with 4.7. I guess, due to this 4.7 patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg00620.html.

[Bug tree-optimization/51499] vectorizer missing simple case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51499 --- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-12-11 13:30:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Looks like there has been some great progress in gcc 4.7! Still I think it behaves slightly buggy. (1) In this case it should work

[Bug tree-optimization/51499] vectorizer missing simple case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51499 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug middle-end/51285] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51285 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/51301] Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51301 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/51301] Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51301 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/51269] Vectorization profitability threshold is not actually used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51269 --- Comment #1 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-11-23 10:46:00 UTC --- Created attachment 25895 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25895 patch Right, this looks like a bug. The attached (not really tested) patch tries

[Bug tree-optimization/51269] Vectorization profitability threshold is not actually used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51269 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 --- Comment #10 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-11-11 06:03:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) patch fixes the ICE, but then the scalar stmt stays in the tree at the end of *.vect pass (and at least in this case is DCEd

[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 --- Comment #11 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-11-11 06:07:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Well, the original code in mdbx.f90 has the interleaving group of 3 (I only changed the decoration around the loop to keep a valid code

[Bug tree-optimization/51000] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vect_get_store_cost, at tree-vect-stmts.c:923 on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51000 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 Status

[Bug tree-optimization/51062] SLP vectorization of dot (inner) product

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51062 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/51000] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vect_get_store_cost, at tree-vect-stmts.c:923 on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51000 --- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-11-09 16:24:05 UTC --- Looks good. Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 --- Comment #4 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-11-09 17:40:26 UTC --- Thanks. Index: tree-vect-slp.c === --- tree-vect-slp.c (revision 181190) +++ tree-vect-slp.c

[Bug c/51015] [4.7 Regression] ice in vect_determine_vectorization_factor with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51015 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/51015] [4.7 Regression] ice in vect_determine_vectorization_factor with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51015 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/51000] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vect_get_store_cost, at tree-vect-stmts.c:923 on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51000 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/50912] [4.7 regression] gimple assertion failure at gimple.h:1940 with -msse2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50912 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50730] SLP vectorization confused by unrelated DRs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50819] missed SLP vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50819 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50912] [4.7 regression] gimple assertion failure at gimple.h:1940 with -msse2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50912 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/50902] [4.7 Regression] intVar/dinternal.cc ICEs at -O2 -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50902 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/50873] The fix to PR50730 causes gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dilayout.c to ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50873 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/50730] SLP vectorization confused by unrelated DRs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730 --- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-10-22 12:09:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) First blush, looks like something could be abstracted as a function or a macro?!? Hmm, I don't know. There is a 'continue' there...

[Bug tree-optimization/50819] missed SLP vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50819 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/50819] missed SLP vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50819 --- Comment #2 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-10-22 12:27:51 UTC --- Created attachment 25574 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25574 Patch for this PR and also fo PR 50730

[Bug tree-optimization/50789] Gather vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789 --- Comment #2 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-10-19 08:47:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) To vectorize the above I'm afraid we'd need to modify tree-data-ref.c as well as tree-vect-data-ref.c, because the memory accesses aren't

[Bug tree-optimization/50789] Gather vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/50746] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr37482.c (internal compiler error) on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746 --- Comment #6 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-10-17 18:10:39 UTC --- pr37482.c is now ok on powerpc64-suse-linux.

[Bug tree-optimization/50746] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr37482.c (internal compiler error) on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746 --- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-10-17 18:49:20 UTC --- I'll fix vect-114.c. It indeed doesn't need realignment. The vectorization failed before switching to optab because of the type mismatch between the mask

[Bug tree-optimization/50727] [4.7 Regression] ICE with segfault in flow_bb_inside_loop_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50727 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/50730] SLP vectorization confused by unrelated DRs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/50727] [4.7 Regression] ICE with segfault in flow_bb_inside_loop_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50727 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50746] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr37482.c (internal compiler error) on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Loop optimization restricted by GOTOs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/50635] ICE on valid: segfault in vectorize_loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50635 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50596] Problems in vectorization of condition expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/50635] ICE on valid: segfault in vectorize_loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50635 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/50493] ICE in neon_disambiguate_copy, at config/arm/arm.c:20388

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50493 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/50412] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast ICE in vect_do_peeling_for_loop_bound

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50412 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50451] [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at tree-vect-loop.c:3557

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50451 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 --- Comment #18 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-22 07:51:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) and -3.c fails with an ICE in the vectorizer, Ira, could you look at that? --- tree-vect-stmts.c 2011-09-22 09:48:34.0

[Bug middle-end/50451] [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at tree-vect-loop.c:3557

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50451 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |irar at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 --- Comment #15 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-21 12:20:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Another thing is that this really ought to work even with -ftree-pre, having a vectorization that requires users to disable PRE would

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 --- Comment #14 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-20 06:23:54 UTC --- The basic block that got vectorized on these platforms is in main(). I am going to remove it and leave only shift(), since the main purpose of the test is to check

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 --- Comment #6 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-20 08:27:08 UTC --- Thanks for working on this! It looks like the problem is with the way the stmts are marked. We don't insert pattern stmts now, so the things are more tricky. I'll

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 --- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-20 11:45:53 UTC --- Created attachment 25322 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25322 fix Here is the fix (it's a diff relative to your patch).

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 --- Comment #8 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-20 11:47:00 UTC --- Created attachment 25323 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25323 complete patch including my fix

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25322|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25323|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #13 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-19 08:59:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) Note that I have replaced all the occurrences of __restrict with __restrict__ I have found in gcc.dg/vect/* and bb-slp-25.c

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-18 08:52:56 UTC --- Thanks. Data dependence analysis can't determine dependence between src and dst although they have _restrict_, and it works fine on x86_64-suse-linux for example

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 --- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-18 10:17:12 UTC --- Right. The data-refs analysis fails for the bit assignment, and SLP marks this statement as not vectorizable and continues with the vectorization of other statements

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #8 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-18 10:48:43 UTC --- Looks like there is a difference ;) I guess it succeeds with the patch to avoid loop vectorization and the fix of restrict together?

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #10 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-18 10:55:19 UTC --- Thanks, I'll commit it.

[Bug tree-optimization/50414] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in store_constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug testsuite/50435] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)? scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using SLP 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435 --- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-16 16:18:37 UTC --- Well, at least the loop is not vectorized now :). Could you please attach the slp dump (-fdump-tree-slp-details)? Thanks, Ira

[Bug tree-optimization/50412] gfortran -Ofast ICE in vect_do_peeling_for_loop_bound

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50412 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/50414] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in store_constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/50208] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vinfo_for_stmt at tree-vectorizer.h:598 with -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50208 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50178] [4.6 regression] ICE with gfortran -O3, not with gfortran -02

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50178 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/50178] [4.6 regression] ICE with gfortran -O3, not with gfortran -02

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50178 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50208] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vinfo_for_stmt at tree-vectorizer.h:598 with -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50208 --- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-01 11:42:24 UTC --- Created attachment 25159 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25159 patch Right. The attached patch does the suggested checks also

[Bug tree-optimization/50208] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vinfo_for_stmt at tree-vectorizer.h:598 with -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50208 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/50138] [4.6 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/50138] [4.6 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138 --- Comment #4 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-08-31 09:42:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) That's up to you to decide, you are the maintainer ;) Yes, but not the release manager... My comment was just in the light of a longish

[Bug tree-optimization/50133] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in vect_finish_stmt_generation (gimple.h:4821) with -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-loop-im

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50133 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/50133] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in vect_finish_stmt_generation (gimple.h:4821) with -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-loop-im

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50133 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/50031] Sphinx3 has a 10% regression going from GCC 4.5 to GCC 4.6 on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/50014] [4.7 Regression] Assertion failed in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50014 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50014] [4.7 Regression] Assertion failed in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50014 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/49955] Fails to do partial basic-block SLP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49955 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com

[Bug tree-optimization/49955] Fails to do partial basic-block SLP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49955 --- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-08-05 10:50:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) The loop that remains after fixing PR49957 in 410.bwaves is the following, which loop SLP does not handle (well, I'm not exactly sure

[Bug tree-optimization/49926] [4.7 Regression] ice in process_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:405

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49926 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49006] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed vectorization due to revision 167531

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 --- Comment #9 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-08-02 09:21:26 UTC --- Basic block SLP only prints basic block vectorized using SLP. But I thought we are talking about loop vectorization here, since the early unrolling is applied only

  1   2   3   >