[Bug c++/121654] template for ICE when referencing a function parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121654 --- Comment #3 from Ivan Lazaric --- Sounds good, I just rebuilt with the patch from the other bug report, ICE went away, thanks.

[Bug c++/121654] template for ICE when referencing a function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121654 --- Comment #1 from Ivan Lazaric --- Just noting, I changed the title of the bug because this seems specific to function arguments, as the following doesn't ICE: ``` void func(){ int arg; template for (int c : {1}){ arg; } } ```

[Bug c++/121654] New: template for ICE when referencing a variable in surrounding scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121654 Bug ID: 121654 Summary: template for ICE when referencing a variable in surrounding scope Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/121647] template for: can't contain case labels for surrounding switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121647 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Lazaric --- Some notes from the standard: https://eel.is/c++draft/stmt.expand#2 ``` The compound-statement of an expansion-statement is a control-flow-limited statement ([stmt.label]). ``` https://eel.is/c++draft/stmt.l

[Bug c++/121647] New: template for: can't contain case labels for surrounding switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121647 Bug ID: 121647 Summary: template for: can't contain case labels for surrounding switch Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/119344] New: internal compiler error related to template parameters and pointers to member functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119344 Bug ID: 119344 Summary: internal compiler error related to template parameters and pointers to member functions Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/113834] internal compiler error: in tree_to_shwi, at tree.cc:6461

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113834 --- Comment #1 from Ivan Lazaric --- Created attachment 57362 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57362&action=edit Preprocessed file generated by `-freport-bug`

[Bug c++/113834] New: internal compiler error: in tree_to_shwi, at tree.cc:6461

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113834 Bug ID: 113834 Summary: internal compiler error: in tree_to_shwi, at tree.cc:6461 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/113826] New: string_view::find sometimes not working in constexpr contexts under -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113826 Bug ID: 113826 Summary: string_view::find sometimes not working in constexpr contexts under -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/113154] New: std::views::values not working with rvalue references to ranges

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113154 Bug ID: 113154 Summary: std::views::values not working with rvalue references to ranges Product: gcc Version: 11.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/109988] -iwithprefix doesn't add folder to end of search list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109988 --- Comment #3 from Ivan Lazaric --- Note that clang has the same flags and behaves according to the documentation, might be some value in matching it. If it's considered too breaking of a change, I would recommend introducing a -iwithprefixaft

[Bug c++/109988] -iwithprefix doesn't add folder to end of search list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109988 --- Comment #1 from Ivan Lazaric --- In `gcc/c-family/c-opts.cc`: ``` case OPT_iwithprefix: add_prefixed_path (arg, INC_SYSTEM); break; ``` Should `INC_SYSTEM` actually be `INC_AFTER` ?

[Bug c++/109988] New: -iwithprefix doesn't add folder to end of search list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109988 Bug ID: 109988 Summary: -iwithprefix doesn't add folder to end of search list Product: gcc Version: 11.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug c++/109112] New: [missed optimization] odd behaviour with [[assume(...)]] and member variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109112 Bug ID: 109112 Summary: [missed optimization] odd behaviour with [[assume(...)]] and member variables Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: