[Bug target/20199] New: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden broken on powerpc64-linux

-hidden broken on powerpc64-linux Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug middle-end/20177] New: ICE in schedule-insns for -O2 -fmodulo-sched

AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: powerpc-*-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20177

[Bug tree-optimization/20134] New: 176.gcc miscompare with -m64 after DOM change

-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20134

[Bug tree-optimization/20134] 176.gcc miscompare with -m64 after DOM change

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22 00:13 --- Created an attachment (id=8249) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8249action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20134

[Bug tree-optimization/20134] [4.0 Regression] 176.gcc miscompare with -m64 after DOM change

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22 00:54 --- I'm recovering from a cold and am fading fast, I'll get more information tomorrow. Another piece of information, though, is that the testcase works if the modified test in record_equality also includes

[Bug libstdc++/19867] New: ext/array_allocator/2.cc test failure in __exchange_and_add

: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: powerpc

[Bug c++/18491] testsuite failure: WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 23:39 --- See the thread at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-02/msg00257.html. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18491

[Bug libstdc++/19495] basic_string::_M_rep() can produce an unnaturally aligned pointer to _Rep

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10 00:27 --- I've made execution of ext/array_allocator/2.cc XFAIL for powerpc*-*-linux*. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19495

[Bug tree-optimization/19833] New: bogus uninitialized variable warning for powerpc64

uninitialized variable warning for powerpc64 Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/19736] [4.0 Regression] ICE with type mismatch between SSA_NAME and its symbol

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02 22:34 --- I tried the patch from comment #4 building 176.gcc with -O1 -g and either -m32 or -m64, and now those work fine. There's another CPU2000 failure we noticed recently with perlbmk built with -m64 -O2 failing

[Bug tree-optimization/19736] [4.0 Regression] ICE with type mismatch between SSA_NAME and its symbol

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 18:45 --- Created an attachment (id=8122) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8122action=view) minimized test case The test case can probably be minimized further but ought to be a better starting point

[Bug tree-optimization/19736] New: ICE with type mismatch between SSA_NAME and its symbol

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19736

[Bug middle-end/17961] ICE for operation on small vector with altivec enabled

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 01:51 --- I just tried with today's mainline for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu and get the same two ICEs as were reported originally. The 3.4 branch gives the error that Serge noted for -DVECSIZE=2 and accepts -DVECSIZE

[Bug c++/19448] Different value representation for bitfield width exceeding its type size.

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janis at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/19448] Different value representation for bitfield width exceeding its type size.

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 23:08 --- Mark closed this based on early comments discussing invalid code, but later comments discuss a problem with valid code. -- What|Removed |Added

<    5   6   7   8   9   10