http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50643
--- Comment #2 from Jon Grant 2012-01-01 11:58:05 UTC ---
differentiation between:
* error
* promoted-to-error
No visibility for the user as they appear the same in the output. Is the
differentiation needed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #6 from Jon Grant 2011-11-12 22:15:36 UTC ---
Could this be followed up with the proposed change implemented?
pre.smallexample { font-size:normal }
Thanks, Jon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669
--- Comment #4 from Jon Grant 2011-10-10 22:41:22 UTC ---
Ok. That makes sense. I confirmed by modifying the test, and having "static int
unused_int;" which gives a warning that it is unused at global scope.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669
--- Comment #2 from Jon Grant 2011-10-09 16:44:18 UTC ---
I could understand this for libraries. However, when linking as an executable
binary, could the global really be still exported?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669
Bug #: 50669
Summary: no warning for unused globals
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50668
Bug #: 50668
Summary: gcc gives warnings for code with #if 0 #endif
code block
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50643
Bug #: 50643
Summary: Suppress cc1: warnings being treated as errors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Bug #: 50642
Summary: onlinedocs formated text too small to read
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43064
--- Comment #2 from jg at jguk dot org 2010-02-14 12:34 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Could the warning message below be revised to include a warning that NULL
> > will
> > evaluate to false or zero?
>
> What else would it e
--- Comment #10 from jg at jguk dot org 2008-06-28 01:00 ---
Dodji Seketeli, Just a quick note to say how great it is that you're working in
this enhancement. Cheers, Jon
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31758
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31757
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31755
line in error messages
main.cpp:5:38
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot o
u dot org
ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-gnu-linux
GCC host triplet: i686-gnu-linux
GCC target triplet: i686-gnu-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31489
--- Comment #6 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-12-01 02:03 ---
Hi Pinski,
What do you think about it mentioning "No such file or directory" ?
I presume if someone had built GCC them self with Java not enabled it would
give the same "gcc: installation problem, cannot exec
--- Comment #4 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-12-01 00:00 ---
Hi, Thanks for your reply.
> We look into acouple of directories to find jc1, so it is not hardcoded
> directly. The --prefix directory is hardcoded into gcc but that is just one
> directory where we look into, we al
--- Comment #2 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-11-30 15:52 ---
Hi,
> What the issue is that distros split up GCC into different packages which
> means
> it is an installation issue but not a GCC issue.
Good point.
I still think the text can be improved; how about like t
ponent.
--
Summary: Clarify gcc jc1 cc1 cc1plus installation problem No such
file or directory error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: other
301 - 320 of 320 matches
Mail list logo