[Bug middle-end/50643] Suppress cc1: warnings being treated as errors

2012-01-01 Thread jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50643 --- Comment #2 from Jon Grant 2012-01-01 11:58:05 UTC --- differentiation between: * error * promoted-to-error No visibility for the user as they appear the same in the output. Is the differentiation needed?

[Bug web/50642] onlinedocs formated text too small to read

2011-11-12 Thread jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 --- Comment #6 from Jon Grant 2011-11-12 22:15:36 UTC --- Could this be followed up with the proposed change implemented? pre.smallexample { font-size:normal } Thanks, Jon

[Bug c/50669] no warning for unused globals

2011-10-10 Thread jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669 --- Comment #4 from Jon Grant 2011-10-10 22:41:22 UTC --- Ok. That makes sense. I confirmed by modifying the test, and having "static int unused_int;" which gives a warning that it is unused at global scope.

[Bug c/50669] no warning for unused globals

2011-10-09 Thread jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669 --- Comment #2 from Jon Grant 2011-10-09 16:44:18 UTC --- I could understand this for libraries. However, when linking as an executable binary, could the global really be still exported?

[Bug c/50669] New: no warning for unused globals

2011-10-08 Thread jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669 Bug #: 50669 Summary: no warning for unused globals Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/50668] New: gcc gives warnings for code with #if 0 .... #endif code block

2011-10-08 Thread jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50668 Bug #: 50668 Summary: gcc gives warnings for code with #if 0 #endif code block Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/50643] New: Suppress cc1: warnings being treated as errors

2011-10-06 Thread jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50643 Bug #: 50643 Summary: Suppress cc1: warnings being treated as errors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug web/50642] New: onlinedocs formated text too small to read

2011-10-06 Thread jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 Bug #: 50642 Summary: onlinedocs formated text too small to read Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/43064] New: Include member name in C++ warning

2010-02-14 Thread jg at jguk dot org
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43064

[Bug c++/31755] Clarify NULL pointer conversion to other types in initialiser

2010-02-14 Thread jg at jguk dot org
--- Comment #2 from jg at jguk dot org 2010-02-14 12:34 --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Could the warning message below be revised to include a warning that NULL > > will > > evaluate to false or zero? > > What else would it e

[Bug other/31754] Include column number along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

2008-06-27 Thread jg at jguk dot org
--- Comment #10 from jg at jguk dot org 2008-06-28 01:00 --- Dodji Seketeli, Just a quick note to say how great it is that you're working in this enhancement. Cheers, Jon -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31754

[Bug other/31758] New: Issue warning about missing include directories specified on command line

2007-04-29 Thread jg at jguk dot org
ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31758

[Bug c++/31757] New: Name arguments in warnings when their names are know

2007-04-29 Thread jg at jguk dot org
Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31757

[Bug c++/31755] New: Clarify NULL pointer conversion to other types in initialiser

2007-04-29 Thread jg at jguk dot org
Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31755

[Bug other/31754] New: Include character count along line in error messages main.cpp:5:38

2007-04-29 Thread jg at jguk dot org
line in error messages main.cpp:5:38 Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot o

[Bug c++/31489] New: error says struct when it should say class

2007-04-05 Thread jg at jguk dot org
u dot org ReportedBy: jg at jguk dot org GCC build triplet: i686-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: i686-gnu-linux GCC target triplet: i686-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31489

[Bug other/29878] Clarify gcc jc1 cc1 cc1plus installation problem No such file or directory error

2006-11-30 Thread jg at jguk dot org
--- Comment #6 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-12-01 02:03 --- Hi Pinski, What do you think about it mentioning "No such file or directory" ? I presume if someone had built GCC them self with Java not enabled it would give the same "gcc: installation problem, cannot exec

[Bug other/29878] Clarify gcc jc1 cc1 cc1plus installation problem No such file or directory error

2006-11-30 Thread jg at jguk dot org
--- Comment #4 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-12-01 00:00 --- Hi, Thanks for your reply. > We look into acouple of directories to find jc1, so it is not hardcoded > directly. The --prefix directory is hardcoded into gcc but that is just one > directory where we look into, we al

[Bug other/29878] Clarify gcc jc1 cc1 cc1plus installation problem No such file or directory error

2006-11-30 Thread jg at jguk dot org
--- Comment #2 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-11-30 15:52 --- Hi, > What the issue is that distros split up GCC into different packages which > means > it is an installation issue but not a GCC issue. Good point. I still think the text can be improved; how about like t

[Bug other/29878] New: Clarify gcc jc1 cc1 cc1plus installation problem No such file or directory error

2006-11-17 Thread jg at jguk dot org
ponent. -- Summary: Clarify gcc jc1 cc1 cc1plus installation problem No such file or directory error Product: gcc Version: 4.0.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: other

<    1   2   3   4