[Bug c++/94100] New: ICE: tree check: accessed elt 1 of 'tree_vec' with 0 elts in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.c:12765

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jjk at acm dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 47998 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47998=edit Source f

[Bug other/46847] New: Missed optimization for variant of Duff's device

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46847 Summary: Missed optimization for variant of Duff's device Product: gcc Version: 4.3.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo:

[Bug other/46847] Missed optimization for variant of Duff's device

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46847 --- Comment #1 from Jens Kilian jjk at acm dot org 2010-12-08 09:12:07 UTC --- Created attachment 22681 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22681 Source code and generated assembly

[Bug other/46847] Missed optimization for variant of Duff's device

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46847 --- Comment #3 from Jens Kilian jjk at acm dot org 2010-12-08 12:10:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) GCC 4.5 doesn't move end computation inside the loop. What do you expect to be good code? I get at -O[23]: [snip] The code generated

[Bug c/37823] New: Missed optimization - ffs() from strings.h

Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jjk at acm dot org GCC host triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37823

[Bug c/36651] New: 64-bit enumerator incorrectly demoted to 32 bits

. -- Summary: 64-bit enumerator incorrectly demoted to 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jjk at acm dot org

[Bug c/36651] 64-bit enumerator incorrectly demoted to 32 bits

--- Comment #1 from jjk at acm dot org 2008-06-27 12:36 --- Created an attachment (id=15820) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15820action=view) Test case. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36651

[Bug c++/36449] New: Incorrect code generated for access to a large struct

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jjk at acm dot org GCC host triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug c++/36449] Incorrect code generated for access to a large struct

--- Comment #1 from jjk at acm dot org 2008-06-06 13:28 --- Created an attachment (id=15725) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15725action=view) C++ code for reproducing the problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36449

[Bug c++/36046] New: Demangler fails on templates with non-type reference parameters

++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jjk at acm dot org GCC host triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36046

[Bug c++/36046] Demangler fails on templates with non-type reference parameters

--- Comment #1 from jjk at acm dot org 2008-04-25 13:57 --- Created an attachment (id=15531) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15531action=view) Test case. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36046

[Bug c++/20004] New: G++ disregards __attribute__((regparm(3))) when calling through a const pointer

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jjk at acm dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i386-redhat-linux GCC target