--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-11 15:59
---
Response to comment #4. We added 1 to the default width in 4.3. The rest has
to do with the rounding logic. I dropped this bug in the crack, so assigned to
myself so i will not forget it.
--
http
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-10 02:11
---
Subject: Bug 37707
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Oct 10 02:10:14 2008
New Revision: 141016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141016
Log:
2008-10-08 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-10 02:14
---
This is fixed on trunk. I think I will back port this to 4.3 since the bug
does result in failing in valid namelists.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37707
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-09 02:40
---
The following simple patch fixes this. I will commit under the obvious and
simple rule. (Obvious once you spend several hours studying it to see what is
going wrong!)
Index: io/list_read.c
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-09 04:16
---
Subject: Bug 37707
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Oct 9 04:14:48 2008
New Revision: 140997
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140997
Log:
2008-10-08 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-09 04:04
---
Subject: Bug 37707
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Oct 9 04:02:35 2008
New Revision: 140995
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140995
Log:
2008-10-08 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 02:54
---
Thomas, any ideas and do you have time to investigate this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37753
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 02:55
---
I am a bit stacked up, but I will explore this one a bit.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 03:58
---
strace shows no difference in number of system calles between 4.3 and 4.4.
gprof has some interesting things to see.
With 4.4:
% cumulative self self total
time seconds
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 04:25
---
With the following test program I created a file to read useing a write in
place of the read.
program testio
implicit none
integer :: i, k
real :: x
real(kind=8) :: y
complex :: c
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-05 17:28
---
Confirmed on 4.3 and 4.1.2 so not a regression.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-06 05:03
---
An easy fix to this would be to disallow kind=2 integer as an argument during
checking.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29651
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 01:46
---
I am investigating.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-27 12:57
---
Fixed on 4.4.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 06:16
---
Subject: Bug 37498
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Sep 26 06:15:21 2008
New Revision: 140683
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140683
Log:
2008-09-25 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 06:21
---
Subject: Bug 37498
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Sep 26 06:19:42 2008
New Revision: 140684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140684
Log:
2008-09-25 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-23 06:26
---
I was doing some additional testing after the above patch and see that it
breaks other things w.r.t 4.3 ABI. An example is namelist_14.f90 which fails
with a 4.3 executable and 4.4 library. I am keeping
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-24 05:14
---
Created an attachment (id=16399)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16399action=view)
New patch that is much better
I could not submit this to the list for approval, my email is not working
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-23 03:53
---
Subject: Bug 37498
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 23 03:52:19 2008
New Revision: 140576
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140576
Log:
2008-09-22 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-21 21:18
---
Final patch submitted to list for approval:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-09/msg00364.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37498
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-20 15:29
---
Proposed solution:
I will add another component to the st_parameter_dt union and call it q. It
will be identical to the existing component p accept with the added IOparms at
the top. In the 4.4 library we
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-21 04:15
---
Experimental patch submitted to list for comment.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-09/msg00353.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37498
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-17 04:13
---
Created an attachment (id=16342)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16342action=view)
Partial patch - reordering of st_parameter_dt structure
I think I may know why the attached patch does
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-14 12:11
---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-09/msg00259.html for start of patch and
request for comments.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37498
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-14 17:58
---
I see that I did not use RESOLVE_TAG in gfc_resolve_dt. Doing so resolves the
ICE issue. Then if we really want to accept this poorly written code, I think
the place to fix it may be in io.c (resolve_tag
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-14 19:01
---
Subject: Bug 35840
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Sep 14 19:00:26 2008
New Revision: 140366
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140366
Log:
2008-09-14 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-14 21:29
---
Patch committed in Comment #7 only eliminates the ICE. Reduction of the
initialization expression remains.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35840
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-13 19:25
---
I am working on fixing this now. I will probably call for help on parts of
this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-12 03:52
---
I will have to explore a bit.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37472
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 03:08
---
Fixed on trunk. Thanks Daniel for the commit.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 03:10
---
Fixed on trunk. Thanks Daniel for the commit.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 03:13
---
Un-assigning myself for the reason stated in comment #5
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-01 14:00
---
Try seeing if you need to install mpfr-devel and gmp-devel packages for your
distribution. This will install the headers needed for those libraries.
Also, make sure you are building in a separate directory away
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 02:47
---
Works for me here with latest trunk. x86-64-linux
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37319
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 21:26
---
I will look into this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 00:05
---
Subject: Bug 36895
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Aug 31 00:04:33 2008
New Revision: 139813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=139813
Log:
2008-08-30 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 00:09
---
Subject: Bug 36895
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Aug 31 00:07:58 2008
New Revision: 139814
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=139814
Log:
2008-08-30 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 00:13
---
Fixed on 4.4 for scalar character internal unit.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37294
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-31 00:24
---
Correction. -std=f95 disallows it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37294
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-26 02:10
---
I read that response to the draft comment. I will take this one.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-24 19:45
---
gfortran does have -fbackslash that enables c-style interpretation of backslash
characters in strings.
With the Intel approach, the code will not compile without error by a standard
conforming compiler. I would
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-23 16:54
---
Needed a little better summary
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-19 02:40
---
Closing as invalid. If anyone sees a reason to re-open, please let me know.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-17 19:03
---
This is not platform specific.
g77 runs this test case without error. gfortran is attempting to read a
default formatted width and when it attempts to read the next character after
the last digit of the third
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-17 22:04
---
I have a patch testing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-16 06:11
---
Subject: Bug 35863
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 16 03:38:31 2008
New Revision: 139147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=139147
Log:
2008-08-15 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-16 06:11
---
Subject: Bug 35863
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 16 03:42:54 2008
New Revision: 139148
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=139148
Log:
2008-08-15 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-16 06:11
---
Subject: Bug 35863
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 16 03:42:54 2008
New Revision: 139148
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=139148
Log:
2008-08-15 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-16 22:48
---
I agree there is legacy g77 behavior involved here. I did a test here, and a
very simple patch will enable this feature. At least for the test case I get
the exact same results as g77. I just disable
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 00:27
---
Without looking at a thing I will guess this is a CR-LF issue. I will have a
look.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37083
dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37076
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37077
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-11 05:14
---
Currently the Fortran front end does not recognize an internal unit of KIND=4.
Fixing this is a follow up to the UTF-8 patch.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-09 19:05
---
I did commit these fixes but reversed two digits in the PR number in the change
log so they did not record here. Fix follows.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36582
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-09 19:13
---
Subject: Bug 36582
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 9 19:12:04 2008
New Revision: 138913
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138913
Log:
2008-07-26 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-09 19:18
---
Subject: Bug 36582
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 9 19:17:24 2008
New Revision: 138914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138914
Log:
2008-07-22 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-09 19:19
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-09 05:20
---
I was holding this open until I back port to 4.3. I got too busy on other
stuff, so I will try this weekend.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36582
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-27 23:25
---
I see only one place in the I/O library that uses GFC_DTYPE_RANK_MASK.
There are many many places in the intrinsics.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36825
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-26 12:57
---
Subject: Bug 36852
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jul 26 12:57:06 2008
New Revision: 138170
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138170
Log:
2008-07-26 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-26 13:07
---
Subject: Bug 36852
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jul 26 13:06:21 2008
New Revision: 138172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138172
Log:
2008-07-26 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-22 16:47
---
I will check on this later tonight or this week. I have wondered about that
comma myself.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-23 01:39
---
I have reviewed our code.
First, we reject the internal unit for namelist when using -std=f95.
$ gfc -std=f95 pr36895.f90
pr36895.f90:4.8:
write(line,nml=stuff)
1
Error: Fortran 2003: Internal file
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-23 04:30
---
Subject: Bug 36852
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 23 04:29:15 2008
New Revision: 138072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138072
Log:
2008-07-22 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-23 04:37
---
Subject: Bug 36852
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 23 04:36:54 2008
New Revision: 138073
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138073
Log:
2008-07-22 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-22 05:02
---
Finally had some quiet time to pick at this. Yep, a one liner. This fixes the
test case and no namelist regressions.
Index: list_read.c
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-21 04:45
---
Subject: Bug 36857
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 21 04:44:10 2008
New Revision: 138021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138021
Log:
2008-07-20 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-21 04:56
---
Fixed on trunk
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-21 05:17
---
Internal unit array I/O with dimensions greater than 7 appears to work OK.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36825
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 17:04
---
A simple fix would be to add a check for ',' or '.'. I can put a simple check
in init options or main.c to set it at run time.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 17:12
---
Tobias, I just caught up with your question to me today. I think you have
answered it. :) Thanks for patch. One thing we should do is check internal
unit array I/O with higher dimensions to see if the loop
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 23:14
---
I should clarify something here. At this time, gfortran does not have its own
dtoa() function. We are using snprintf (or sprintf) to write to a char buffer.
This is done to extract the digits. We then process
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 23:36
---
The following fixes the reporters test case. You will notice that even with
the locale set for a comma that the resulting formatted output from the test
case has a '.'
Index: write_float.def
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-16 02:59
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 00:52
---
Subject: Bug 36725
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 14 00:51:44 2008
New Revision: 137769
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137769
Log:
2008-07-13 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 01:03
---
Subject: Bug 36725
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 14 01:02:05 2008
New Revision: 137770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137770
Log:
2008-07-14 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 01:06
---
Fixed on trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36725
when building only c and fortran
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-12 01:22
---
I think maybe this is the right fix, in keeping with what we do now other
places. But the error message is not as clear.
Index: io.c
===
--- io.c
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 15:50
---
I have remote access to the machine now. Having trouble with gcc build. Not
forgotton.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36689
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 15:52
---
So far this is a tricky one. Probably turn out to be a one liner or a
re-write. :) Status is I am on travel, but still working it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36582
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-07 02:50
---
I am on it.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-03 18:32
---
This issue comes up on Cygwin a lot as well. Even though the wiki says more
then once to install the gmp and mpfr libraries in the instructions for
installing the binary.
In the Cygwin case, I do that build, so
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-03 18:33
---
On my list
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 14:20
---
OK to commit after testing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36681
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 14:27
---
To debug this we will probably need to get remote ssh access to a machine like
this. I can think of three possible causes of the problem at the moment.
1) The executable is accessing the wrong version
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-01 19:32
---
Do you see the problem if XP is not declared a pointer?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36689
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 03:59
---
Subject: Bug 36676
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 2 03:58:57 2008
New Revision: 137334
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137334
Log:
2008-07-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 04:02
---
Subject: Bug 36676
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 2 04:01:57 2008
New Revision: 137335
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137335
Log:
2008-07-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 04:45
---
Subject: Bug 36546
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 2 04:44:21 2008
New Revision: 137336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137336
Log:
2008-07-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 04:45
---
Subject: Bug 36676
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 2 04:44:21 2008
New Revision: 137336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137336
Log:
2008-07-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 04:45
---
Subject: Bug 36657
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 2 04:44:21 2008
New Revision: 137336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137336
Log:
2008-07-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 04:53
---
Subject: Bug 36657
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 2 04:52:47 2008
New Revision: 137337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137337
Log:
2008-07-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 04:53
---
Subject: Bug 36676
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 2 04:52:47 2008
New Revision: 137337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137337
Log:
2008-07-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 04:53
---
Subject: Bug 36546
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 2 04:52:47 2008
New Revision: 137337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137337
Log:
2008-07-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 04:53
---
Subject: Bug 36538
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 2 04:52:47 2008
New Revision: 137337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137337
Log:
2008-07-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 05:06
---
Currently 4.4 is giving:
$ gfc bounds.f90
bounds.f90:6.31:
write(*,*) JTEJ(0,1000,:) * pT(1000,:)
1
Warning: Array reference at (1) is out of bounds (1000 1) in dimension 1
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 05:15
---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 05:18
---
Fixed on Trunk and 4.3
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
901 - 1000 of 3029 matches
Mail list logo
