--- Comment #1 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-12 17:04 ---
The exact same problem as PR rtl-optmization/27538 is happening.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27538 ***
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-12 17:04 ---
*** Bug 27539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27538
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-12 17:05 ---
Note that the same bug is causing
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/941014-2.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/941014-2.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/941014-2.c execution, -Os
--
http
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 07:31 ---
Some analysis at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-05/msg00263.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27505
--- Comment #1 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 18:44 ---
Just for a reference, here is execute/20030128-1.c.
unsigned char x = 50;
volatile short y = -5;
int main ()
{
x /= y;
if (x != (unsigned char) -10)
abort ();
exit (0);
}
Now, with -O1, the load of y
--- Comment #2 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 18:54 ---
Here is a reduced testcase.
volatile short y;
int
foo (void)
{
return y;
}
With -O1, this function magically turns into return 0; like so
foo:
@ Function supports interworking.
@ args = 0, pretend
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 19:40 ---
The combiner combines
=== i1 ===
(insn 10 8 11 2 (set (reg/f:SI 103)
(symbol_ref:SI (y) var_decl 0xf7f71de0 y)) 145 {*arm_movsi_insn}
(nil)
(nil))
=== i2 ===
(insn 11 10 13 2 (set (reg:SI 105 [ y
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 20:36 ---
I just confirmed that 4.1 generates correct code with -O1,
so this is a regression.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 14:21 ---
Reduced down to:
extern void bar (int);
int
foo (int a, int b)
{
int c = a == b;
if (c)
bar (c);
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27477
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 15:00 ---
The combiner seems to be doing something strange:
(insn 13 12 16 2 (set (reg:HI 21)
(eq:HI (cc0)
(const_int 0 [0x0]))) 237 {*bstzhireg} (nil)
(nil))
(insn 16 13 17 2 (set (cc0)
(reg:HI
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 16:49 ---
Assigning to Volker as he posted a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 17:00 ---
Could you submit a preprocessed testcase?
Many of us do not have m68k hardware that can be used for bootstrap.
Thanks,
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 17:35 ---
Subject: Bug 24949
Author: kazu
Date: Wed May 10 17:35:24 2006
New Revision: 113675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113675
Log:
PR target/24949
* config/m68k/m68k.md
--- Comment #2 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 17:35 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27538
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27539
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 15:26 ---
Can we close this PR now?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25496
--- Comment #15 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 15:41 ---
I cannot reproduce the problem even with -O2 -fno-trapping-math.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16589
--- Comment #16 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 15:47 ---
Disregard my last comment.
The original testcase still fails if I use -fno-trapping-math.
The testcase in #3 doesn't fail with or without -fno-trapping-math.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 15:55 ---
Not reproducible on mainline.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 16:00 ---
Andreas, are you going to submit your patch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16589
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 16:04 ---
The mainline works fine.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 16:09 ---
Not reproducible with mainline.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 16:10 ---
Not reproducible with mainline.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 16:14 ---
Not reproducible with mainline.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 16:19 ---
Not reproducible with mainiline.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 16:21 ---
Closed as the submitter agrees.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 16:29 ---
According to Andreas, this works as of 4.0.2.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 16:32 ---
Works as of 4.1 according to #7.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 16:44 ---
Not reproducible.
I built a m68k-elf toolchain on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and compiled the testcase.
No ICE was observed.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 16:55 ---
Still reproducible with mainline.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23695
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 18:55 ---
Reduced to a C testcase:
extern void bar (int c);
int b;
int
foo (int c1, int c2, int c3)
{
int plus = c1 == c2;
if ((plus || c1 == c3)
! b)
bar (plus);
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: h8300-none-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27477
--- Comment #1 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 04:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=11399)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11399action=view)
testcase
Compile this testcase, derived from libstdc++, with -msx -O2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 20:13 ---
Subject: Bug 26765
Author: kazu
Date: Thu May 4 20:13:37 2006
New Revision: 113536
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113536
Log:
gcc/
PR target/26765
* config/mips/mips.c
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 20:15 ---
Subject: Bug 26765
Author: kazu
Date: Thu May 4 20:14:58 2006
New Revision: 113537
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113537
Log:
gcc/
PR target/26765
* config/mips/mips.c
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 20:18 ---
Subject: Bug 26765
Author: kazu
Date: Thu May 4 20:18:24 2006
New Revision: 113538
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113538
Log:
gcc/
PR target/26765
* config/mips/mips.c
--- Comment #8 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 20:21 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 14:05 ---
Subject: Bug 27374
Author: kazu
Date: Tue May 2 14:05:14 2006
New Revision: 113464
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113464
Log:
Backport:
2006-05-01 Kazu Hirata [EMAIL PROTECTED
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi
http
--- Comment #1 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 15:04 ---
Subject: Bug 27387
Author: kazu
Date: Tue May 2 15:04:52 2006
New Revision: 113467
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113467
Log:
gcc/
PR target/27387
* arm.c (arm_output_mi_thunk
--- Comment #2 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 15:06 ---
Subject: Bug 27387
Author: kazu
Date: Tue May 2 15:06:35 2006
New Revision: 113468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113468
Log:
gcc/
PR target/27387
* arm.c (arm_output_mi_thunk
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 15:13 ---
Subject: Bug 27387
Author: kazu
Date: Tue May 2 15:13:02 2006
New Revision: 113470
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113470
Log:
gcc/
PR target/27387
* arm.c (arm_output_mi_thunk
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 15:17 ---
Subject: Bug 27387
Author: kazu
Date: Tue May 2 15:17:25 2006
New Revision: 113471
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113471
Log:
Backport:
2006-05-02 Kazu Hirata [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Comment #5 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 15:26 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27374
--- Comment #1 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 21:55 ---
Subject: Bug 27374
Author: kazu
Date: Mon May 1 21:55:02 2006
New Revision: 113436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113436
Log:
PR target/27374
* config/arm/vfp.md (*arm_movdi_vfp
--- Comment #2 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 21:56 ---
Subject: Bug 27374
Author: kazu
Date: Mon May 1 21:56:47 2006
New Revision: 113437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113437
Log:
PR target/27374
* config/arm/vfp.md (*arm_movdi_vfp
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 21:58 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 23:47 ---
Subject: Bug 26557
Author: kazu
Date: Tue Apr 11 23:47:35 2006
New Revision: 112870
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112870
Log:
Backport from mainline.
2006-03-13 Roger Sayle
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 20:47 ---
Subject: Bug 26684
Author: kazu
Date: Tue Mar 14 20:47:17 2006
New Revision: 112067
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112067
Log:
PR middle-end/26684
* reg-stack.c
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 21:11 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 21:43 ---
Last time I came up with a patch, it introduced 0.1% or so of slow down.
I'll try my patch again when I get a chance.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24028
--- Comment #10 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-28 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 19606
Author: kazu
Date: Sat Jan 28 05:19:44 2006
New Revision: 110321
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=110321
Log:
gcc/
PR c/19606.
* c-typeck.c (build_binary_op
--- Comment #11 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-28 05:25 ---
Just checked in a patch to mainline.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 17:07 ---
Posted a new patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL
--- Comment #12 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 16:08 ---
Subject: Bug 25590
Author: kazu
Date: Wed Jan 25 16:08:26 2006
New Revision: 110215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=110215
Log:
PR testsuite/25590
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c
--- Comment #13 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 16:11 ---
Subject: Bug 25590
Author: kazu
Date: Wed Jan 25 16:11:17 2006
New Revision: 110216
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=110216
Log:
PR testsuite/25590
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c
--- Comment #14 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 16:11 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 16:38 ---
Posted a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #8 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 14:07 ---
Assigning to myself.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-15 21:44 ---
In the original test case, TRUNC_DIV_EXPR is used, but we can also use
TRUNC_MOD_EXPR to cause a similar problem. See below.
#include stdio.h
signed char a = -4;
#if 0
#define CALC(A) (((unsigned int) (signed int
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 15:42 ---
Subject: Bug 25485
Author: kazu
Date: Sat Jan 14 15:42:11 2006
New Revision: 109704
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=109704
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/25485
* tree-vrp.c
--- Comment #5 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 15:48 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #22 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 04:37 ---
Subject: Bug 25125
Author: kazu
Date: Mon Jan 9 04:37:09 2006
New Revision: 109495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=109495
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/25125
* convert.c
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.1.0 |
Known to work|4.0.3 4.2.0 |4.0.3 4.1.0 4.2.0
--- Comment #23 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 04:42 ---
Checked in a patch to both 4.1 and 4.2.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25125
--- Comment #18 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 16:59 ---
Dave,
I am having tough time building the compiler for hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
These days gcc won't even allow you to build cc1 without an assembler and such.
How do you build your compiler? Using the native
--- Comment #12 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 23:00 ---
Subject: Bug 25125
Author: kazu
Date: Mon Dec 26 23:00:18 2005
New Revision: 109065
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=109065
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/25125
* convert.c
--- Comment #13 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 23:01 ---
Just checked in a patch for mainline (4.2.0).
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 04:03 ---
Subject: Bug 23518
Author: kazu
Date: Thu Dec 22 04:03:32 2005
New Revision: 108940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108940
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/23518
* fold-const.c
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 04:04 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 04:06 ---
Oops, I forgot to change resolution to FIXED.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 14:47 ---
Subject: Bug 25501
Author: kazu
Date: Tue Dec 20 14:47:07 2005
New Revision: 108853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108853
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/25501
* tree-cfgcleanup.c
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 14:48 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 19:58 ---
I've got a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #1 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 05:58 ---
Subject: Bug 25382
Author: kazu
Date: Wed Dec 21 05:58:02 2005
New Revision: 108898
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108898
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/25382.
* tree-vrp.c
--- Comment #2 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 05:58 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25382
: Segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot
--- Comment #1 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 05:31 ---
This seems to be due to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01490.html
Removing the tree-cfgcleanup.c part of the patch fixes the problem.
Basically, I cooked up a testcase so that this problem would
--- Comment #2 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 05:42 ---
I've got a patch in testing.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 05:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=10533)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10533action=view)
Patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501
-structalias.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kazu
--- Comment #5 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-18 15:48 ---
Is this PR fixed? Or does it need some follow-up work?
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 00:01 ---
I've got a preliminary patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 00:37 ---
We are basically talking about narrowing the memory being loaded for testing.
Now, can we really optimize this case? We've got
const volatile unsigned long *addr
I am not sure if volatile allows us to change
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 02:30 ---
I just compiled the testcase on x86_64. I got
foo:
.LFB2:
movq%rdi, %rax
negq%rax
andq%rdi, %rax
ret
which is as good as the assembly generated by 3.4.3
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot
--- Comment #2 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 02:05 ---
Subject: Bug 25456
Author: kazu
Date: Sat Dec 17 02:05:07 2005
New Revision: 108707
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108707
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/25456
* struct-equiv.c
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 02:10 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 02:19 ---
Sorry, I closed a wrong bug. I meant to close PR 25456.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 02:20 ---
Just checked in a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 02:27 ---
Anil, would you care to post your patch on gcc-patches?
In general, people don't review patches in PRs.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14798
101 - 200 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
