[Bug target/25136] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20050303-1.c -O0

2005-11-28 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: m68k-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25136

[Bug target/25138] New: [m68k] undefined reference to `__floatunsidf'

2005-11-28 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: m68k-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25138

[Bug target/25128] New: [m68k] Suboptimal comparisons against 65536

2005-11-27 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
65536 Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot

[Bug target/25128] [m68k] Suboptimal comparisons against 65536

2005-11-27 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25128

[Bug target/25114] [m68k] Suboptimal inequality comparisons with small integers

2005-11-27 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25114

[Bug target/25113] [m68k] lshiftrt and some other insns are conservative on cc0

2005-11-27 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25113

[Bug target/25111] New: [m68k] bset is not used for A = 1 (B 31) on ColdFire

2005-11-26 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: m68k-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25111

[Bug target/25111] [m68k] bset is not used for A = 1 (B 31) on ColdFire

2005-11-26 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-27 00:52 --- The whole story applies to XOR as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25111

[Bug target/25112] New: [m68k] Inefficient equality comparison with small integers

2005-11-26 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: m68k-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25112

[Bug target/25113] New: [m68k] lshiftrt and some other insns are conservative on cc0

2005-11-26 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
on cc0 Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc

[Bug target/25114] New: [m68k] Inefficient inequality comparisons with small integers

2005-11-26 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: m68k-elf BugsThisDependsOn: 25113 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25114

[Bug target/19201] [m68k] Inefficient code for array accesses (from old PROBLEMS)

2005-11-22 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 17:42 --- Andreas, Thanks for spotting the typo. I also updated the patch to ensure that we are giving an address register indirect to clr. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19201

[Bug target/23435] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Unrecognizable insn (in extract_insn, at recog.c)

2005-11-22 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 20:42 --- Subject: Bug 23435 Author: kazu Date: Tue Nov 22 20:42:54 2005 New Revision: 107373 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107373 Log: gcc/ PR target/23435 * m68k.md (zero_extendsidi2

[Bug target/23435] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Unrecognizable insn (in extract_insn, at recog.c)

2005-11-22 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 20:53 --- Subject: Bug 23435 Author: kazu Date: Tue Nov 22 20:53:08 2005 New Revision: 107374 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107374 Log: gcc/ PR target/23435 * m68k.md (zero_extendsidi2

[Bug target/23435] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Unrecognizable insn (in extract_insn, at recog.c)

2005-11-22 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 20:56 --- Just checked in a patch. -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/21578] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands for Coldfire.

2005-11-20 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 02:26 --- Shall we close this as WORKSFORME? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21578

[Bug target/20583] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand

2005-11-20 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 04:41 --- Subject: Bug 20583 Author: kazu Date: Mon Nov 21 04:41:38 2005 New Revision: 107278 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107278 Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/20583 * cse.c (cse_insn): Reject

[Bug target/20583] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand

2005-11-20 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 06:52 --- Subject: Bug 20583 Author: kazu Date: Mon Nov 21 06:52:01 2005 New Revision: 107281 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107281 Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/20583 * cse.c (cse_insn): Reject

[Bug target/24850] [4.1 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux

2005-11-19 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 20:48 --- I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate of PR 24912, which has got more analysis. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24912 *** -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/24912] m68k build failure: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-19 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 20:48 --- *** Bug 24850 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/24912] [4.1, 4.2 Regression] m68k build failure: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-19 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org Summary|m68k build failure: ICE

[Bug target/21578] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands for Coldfire.

2005-11-19 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:05 --- Is this still reproducible? A quick check with m68k-none-elf did not reproduce the ICE. -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/24279] SEGV at reload.c:2400 with -O2

2005-11-19 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:13 --- Jonathan, The testcase seems to work with GCC 4.1. As far as getting the testcase into the testsuite, you need to post a patch first. The best thing to do at this point is to reduce the testcase so

[Bug target/23695] [ColdFire] Illegal move of byte intoo address register causes compiler to ICE

2005-11-19 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:19 --- Confirmed with m68k-none-elf. Probably not specific to RTEMS. -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/23695] [ColdFire] Illegal move of byte intoo address register causes compiler to ICE

2005-11-19 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:26 --- Slightly reduced to: extern void bar (unsigned char, unsigned char, unsigned char); void foo (unsigned char *key, unsigned int round) { unsigned char a = 0, b = 0, c = 0; while (round-- 0

[Bug target/19201] [m68k] Inefficient code for array accesses (from old PROBLEMS)

2005-11-19 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:52 --- FWIW, the mainline gcc with -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer produces f: move.l 4(%sp),%a0 move.l (%a0),%a1 move.l 4(%a0),%a0 clr.b (%a0,%a1.l) rts -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug target/19201] [m68k] Inefficient code for array accesses (from old PROBLEMS)

2005-11-19 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-20 00:22 --- Created an attachment (id=10299) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10299action=view) Patch With this patch, I get: f: move.l 4(%sp),%a0 move.l (%a0),%a1 add.l 4(%a0),%a1

[Bug target/24949] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20000403-2.c -O0

2005-11-19 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: m68k-none-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24949

[Bug target/23435] [4.1 Regression] Unrecognizable insn (in extract_insn, at recog.c)

2005-11-05 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-05 23:23 --- Reduced down to: void foo (unsigned long *a, unsigned long long *p) { if (*p == 0) *p = *a; } -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/23435] [4.1 Regression] Unrecognizable insn (in extract_insn, at recog.c)

2005-11-05 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-05 23:32 --- Reduced down to: void foo (unsigned long *a, unsigned long long *p) { *p = *a; } -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23435

[Bug target/23435] [4.1 Regression] Unrecognizable insn (in extract_insn, at recog.c)

2005-11-05 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug target/20583] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand

2005-11-05 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 02:10 --- Reduced down to: void bar (unsigned int); void foo (void) { char buf[1] = { 3 }; const char *p = buf; const char **q = p; unsigned int ch; switch (**q) { case 1: ch = 5; break; case 2: ch = 4

[Bug tree-optimization/24689] New: store_ccp is missing an opportunity!?

2005-11-05 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24689

[Bug target/20583] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand

2005-11-05 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug rtl-optimization/24497] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in apply_opt_in_copies, at loop-unroll.c:2122

2005-11-05 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 04:25 --- Not reproducible using x86_64-pc-linux-gnu X m68k-none-elf. Paul, is this still reproducible? I also tried, gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-6.c, but I didn't get any ICE. -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed

[Bug target/19421] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with soft-float on m68k

2005-11-05 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 04:28 --- Not reproducible using x86_64-pc-linux-gnu X m68k-none-elf. I'm using mainline for the cross compiler. -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/20928] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE: unrecognizable insns

2005-10-09 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-10 03:20 --- The testcase in comment #8 still triggers an ICE if run with -O -mtune=k8 -fPIC. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20928

[Bug middle-end/23090] [4.0 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20050713-1.c -Os fails

2005-10-08 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 18:06 --- According to David Edelsohn's testresults on powerpc, 20050713-1.c is OK now. So now, the problem is only on the 4.0 branch. -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/23150] 20050713-1.c fails on arm-none-eabi with -O2 or -Os.

2005-10-07 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 03:34 --- Just checked in a patch. -- kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/23090] [4.0/4.1 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20050713-1.c -Os fails

2005-10-07 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 03:36 --- I just checked in a fix for PR 23150, which is probably duplicate of this PR. Could somebody test the current mainline now on powerpc? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23090

[Bug c++/24138] [4.1 regression] ICE with the code in PR 20407

2005-09-30 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 17:12 --- Confirmed -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/24153] New: memory leak

2005-09-30 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24153

[Bug tree-optimization/24153] memory leak

2005-09-30 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 21:34 --- Created an attachment (id=9850) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9850action=view) memory leaks from gcc -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24153

[Bug middle-end/23150] 20050713-1.c fails on arm-none-eabi with -O2 or -Os.

2005-09-28 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-29 04:47 --- This turned out to be a bug in calls.c. Changing to middle-end. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/23150] 20050713-1.c fails on arm-none-eabi with -O2 or -Os.

2005-09-28 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug target/23150] 20050713-1.c fails on arm-none-eabi with -O2 or -Os.

2005-09-26 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-26 16:13 --- Slightly reduced to: extern void abort (void) __attribute__((noreturn)); struct S { int a, b, c; }; void foo2 (struct S x, struct S y) { if (x.b != 4) abort (); } void bar2 (struct S x, struct S y

[Bug middle-end/23960] [4.1 regression] ICE in compare_values in VRP

2005-09-25 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-26 01:29 --- Just checked in a patch. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

2005-09-25 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 22368 depends on bug 23960, which changed state. Bug 23960 Summary: [4.1 regression] ICE in compare_values in VRP http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23960 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug tree-optimization/23968] [meta-bug] VRP bug reports

2005-09-25 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 23968 depends on bug 23960, which changed state. Bug 23960 Summary: [4.1 regression] ICE in compare_values in VRP http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23960 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug middle-end/23971] [4.0/4.1 Regression] synth_mult running amok

2005-09-24 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-24 23:58 --- (In reply to comment #12) It takes about 10 minutes to compile attached testcase with -O2 -mcpu=ev4 and about 2 minutes for -O2 -mcpu=ev5 (compiled on EV45 233Mhz). The difference is in cost of multiply op

[Bug tree-optimization/24028] CCP is broken

2005-09-24 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-25 02:57 --- By the way, unpatched cc1 propagated 95619 constants while compiling cc1-i files. Patched one propagated 96482 constants in the ccp run (that is, not store-ccp). So there is a 0.9% improvement. -- http

[Bug tree-optimization/24028] CCP is broken

2005-09-23 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-24 04:29 --- I tried the following code in ccp_initialize. for (phi = phi_nodes (bb); phi; phi = PHI_CHAIN (phi)) { tree var = PHI_RESULT (phi); DONT_SIMULATE_AGAIN (phi) = (!do_store_ccp

[Bug middle-end/23960] [4.1 regression] ICE in compare_values in VRP

2005-09-22 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/24026] New: cleanup_control_expr_graph uses fold to fold COND_EXPR_COND

2005-09-22 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
to fold COND_EXPR_COND Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu

[Bug tree-optimization/24028] New: CCP is broken

2005-09-22 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24028

[Bug tree-optimization/24028] CCP is broken

2005-09-22 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-23 05:29 --- The reason why CCP thinks that the result of the PHI node is varying is because ccp_initialize thinks that a PHI node is varying if at least one of PHI argument is varying. The problem is that the edge

[Bug middle-end/23971] [4.0/4.1 Regression] synth_mult running amok

2005-09-21 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-21 16:50 --- Just checked in a patch. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/23971] [4.0/4.1 Regression] synth_mult running amok

2005-09-20 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20 19:28 --- On alpha-linux-gnu, synth_mult is called 20 million times. I've got one idea that might or might not work. Currently, synth_mult records successful cases in it hash/cache. That is, if synth_mult determines

[Bug middle-end/23971] [4.0/4.1 Regression] synth_mult running amok

2005-09-20 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20 22:12 --- OK, with my idea I can cut down the number of calls to synth_mult to 1.4 million. I may be able to improve further by recording the cost in successful cases. -- What|Removed

[Bug target/23783] New: gcc.c-torture/compile/calls.c triggers an ICE

2005-09-08 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23783

[Bug target/23746] New: m32c.h has a typo

2005-09-05 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
: P2 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: dj at redhat dot com,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,nickc at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23746

[Bug target/23473] New: ICE at config/arm/arm.c:3280

2005-08-18 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug target/23473] [4.1 Regression] ICE at config/arm/arm.c:3280

2005-08-18 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-19 03:11 --- In fact, reverting Richard Earnshaw's patch 2005-08-15 Richard Earnshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR target/23355 * arm.c (thumb_compute_save_reg_mask): Use similar logic

[Bug target/23150] New: 20050713-1.c fails on arm-none-eabi with -O2 or -Os.

2005-07-30 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-none-eabi with -O2 or -Os. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug target/23136] New: arm-none-eabi doesn't build anymore

2005-07-29 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
Priority: P2 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23136

[Bug rtl-optimization/22384] New: compiling cp-mangle.c causes an ICE

2005-07-09 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
an ICE Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

2005-07-08 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- ||patches/2005- |

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] [4.0/4.1 Regression] upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

2005-07-08 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:49 --- Just checked in a fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22360

[Bug testsuite/22357] New: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp17.c assumes an argument evaluation order

2005-07-07 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,law at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug testsuite/22357] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp17.c assumes an argument evaluation order

2005-07-07 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-07 23:34 --- Thanks, Jeff! I'll assign the bug to you then. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] New: upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

2005-07-07 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
and lower_bound_in_type are buggy Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug regression/20139] [4.0/4.1 regression] cris-elf testsuite: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c

2005-07-07 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22360 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20139

[Bug testsuite/22296] New: gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c and gcc.dg/sibcall-4.c FAIL on ARM THUMB

2005-07-04 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
.c FAIL on ARM THUMB Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu

<    1   2   3