--- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2005-02-08 03:18
---
Subject: Re: [3.3 only] mips-sgi-irix6.5 testsuite failure in
gcc.dg/overflow-1.c with -mabi=64
Huh? It may be a legitimate failure, but you've decided not to fix it. I
thought that's exactly what an XFAIL
--- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2005-01-02 17:18
---
Subject: Re: ICE in g++.old-deja/g++.pt/asm1.C and asm2.C with -fpic/-fPIC
I'm not familiar with inline asm, what exactly in the testcase reveals that
ebx will be used?
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2004-12-07 13:47
---
Subject: Re: [3.3 only] mips-sgi-irix6.5 testsuite failure in
gcc.dg/overflow-1.c with -mabi=64
Fine with me. Then we should XFAIL it on the 3.3 branch at mabi=64. I
don't have access to irix anymore
--- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2004-12-07 20:08
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] isdigit builtin function fails with EBCDIC
character sets
So it appears to me that the compiler builtin knows not to activate when
the
-fexec-charset is invoked?
No, there's
--- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2004-12-06 22:06
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] isdigit builtin function fails with EBCDIC
character sets
Out of curiousity, do you have any problems with builtin printf's conversion
of printf(hello world\n) - puts(hello world
--- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2004-12-02 15:08
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] isdigit builtin function fails with EBCDIC
character sets
The .i attachments you supplied use C header macro versions of isdigit, not
the builtin function. E.g.:
retval
--- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2004-12-02 15:56
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] isdigit builtin function fails with EBCDIC
character sets
However, the s390x-ibm-tpf example does not use those macros.
No really it doesn't. I just check both again.
I can
--- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2004-11-08 20:45
---
Subject: Re: __pic__/__PIC__ not defined when -fpic/-fPIC is specified
I submitted a patch to fix this back in April:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04.argh/msg00168.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2004-11-03 05:13 ---
Subject: Re: C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
The problem appears to be fixed in every multilib combination.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-11/msg00098.html
http
--- Additional Comments From kghazi at verizon dot net 2004-11-01 16:33 ---
Subject: Re: C testsuite failures in compile/simd-5.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
Ditto on Sparc64-solaris2.9, see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-11/msg00030.html
I'm curious though whether
10 matches
Mail list logo
