[Bug java/53527] 4.7.0 release can't enable java language

2012-05-31 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53527 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug java/53527] New: 4.7.0 release can't enable java language

2012-05-30 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53527 Bug #: 53527 Summary: 4.7.0 release can't enable java language Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority:

[Bug java/53527] 4.7.0 release can't enable java language

2012-05-30 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53527 --- Comment #2 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2012-05-31 03:01:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) mips-unknown-elf is not a hosted platform and thus does not support Java. But why the GCC 4.4.2 is OK,and I

[Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

2012-04-09 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 --- Comment #6 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2012-04-09 11:14:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) Yes,but why we can't remove the function notused() form vtable, since this function

[Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

2012-04-07 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal

[Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

2012-04-07 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug java/48417] -ffixed-regs option can't work in mips-elf-gcj compiler

2011-08-27 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48417 --- Comment #6 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-08-27 06:12:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) still hava this problem,please see the latest commit See PR43700, which I suspect

[Bug java/49556] The import A cannot be resolved,But the A is placed at the current dir.

2011-08-23 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49556 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug java/49556] The import A cannot be resolved,But the A is placed at the current dir.

2011-06-28 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49556 --- Comment #2 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-06-28 16:25:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) I think this is correct as classes in the same packages don't cannot be imported. yes,you are right!Please

[Bug java/49556] New: The import A cannot be resolved,But the A is placed at the current dir.

2011-06-27 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49556 Summary: The import A cannot be resolved,But the A is placed at the current dir. Product: gcc Version: 4.4.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3

[Bug java/49258] New: -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

2011-06-01 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 Summary: -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj Product: gcc Version: 4.4.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

2011-06-01 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major

[Bug java/20215] gcj does not accept classes with same name fields

2011-06-01 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215 --- Comment #11 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-06-01 16:12:04 UTC --- is anybody here???

[Bug java/20215] gcj does not accept classes with same name fields

2011-05-28 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215 --- Comment #10 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-05-28 07:45:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Confirmed, the gij problem has been fixed by the patches above, this only leaves the java front-end problem

[Bug java/20215] gcj does not accept classes with same name fields

2011-05-26 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug java/20215] gcj does not accept classes with same name fields

2011-05-26 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215 --- Comment #6 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-05-26 12:44:09 UTC --- the Testcase attachments can't donwload

[Bug libgcj/46575] relocation overflow when compile libgcj_tools_la-tools.o

2011-05-26 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46575 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug java/20215] gcj does not accept classes with same name fields

2011-05-26 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215 --- Comment #7 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-05-26 15:06:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) the Testcase attachments can't donwload I have got the Testcase,but it still hava problem [lee@localhost

[Bug java/20215] gcj does not accept classes with same name fields

2011-05-26 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215 --- Comment #8 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-05-27 04:37:22 UTC --- gij is OK

[Bug java/49185] New: gcj does not accept classes with same name fields at new gcc version

2011-05-26 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49185 Summary: gcj does not accept classes with same name fields at new gcc version Product: gcc Version: 4.4.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3

[Bug java/48417] -ffixed-regs option can't work in mips-elf-gcj compiler

2011-05-17 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48417 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug java/26007] initialized final static data should go in .rodata, not .data

2011-05-17 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26007 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug java/26007] initialized final static data should go in .rodata, not .data

2011-05-17 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26007 --- Comment #4 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-05-17 16:12:07 UTC --- can anybody tell me how to change the final form .data to .rodata. which files have the check in gcc?

[Bug java/48417] -ffixed-regs option can't work in mips-elf-gcj compiler

2011-04-27 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48417 --- Comment #3 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-04-27 16:03:56 UTC --- GCJjava_main.java Using built-in specs. Target: mips-elf Configured with: ../gcc-4.4.2/configure --prefix=/home/lee/gnu_src

[Bug java/48417] -ffixed-regs option can't work in mips-elf-gcj compiler

2011-04-03 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48417 --- Comment #2 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-04-03 15:43:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) You have to build the java runtime with -ffixed-reg also. The runtime and all my project also have those options

[Bug java/48417] New: -ffixed-regs option can't work in mips-elf-gcj compiler

2011-04-02 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48417 Summary: -ffixed-regs option can't work in mips-elf-gcj compiler Product: gcc Version: 4.4.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3

[Bug libgcj/46575] relocation overflow when compile libgcj_tools_la-tools.o

2010-11-22 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46575 licheng.1...@gmail.com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|java

[Bug java/46575] New: relocation overflow when compile libgcj_tools_la-tools.o

2010-11-20 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46575 Summary: relocation overflow when compile libgcj_tools_la-tools.o Product: gcc Version: 4.4.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3

[Bug java/46575] relocation overflow when compile libgcj_tools_la-tools.o

2010-11-20 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46575 --- Comment #1 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2010-11-20 11:20:19 UTC --- Created attachment 22466 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22466 libgcj_tools_la-tools.S.tar.bz2 file 1

[Bug java/46575] relocation overflow when compile libgcj_tools_la-tools.o

2010-11-20 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46575 --- Comment #2 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2010-11-20 11:21:39 UTC --- Created attachment 22467 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22467 libgcj_tools_la-tools.S.tar.bz2 file 2

[Bug java/46575] relocation overflow when compile libgcj_tools_la-tools.o

2010-11-20 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46575 --- Comment #3 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2010-11-20 11:22:56 UTC --- Created attachment 22468 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22468 libgcj_tools_la-tools.S.tar.bz2 file 3

[Bug java/46575] relocation overflow when compile libgcj_tools_la-tools.o

2010-11-20 Thread licheng.1212 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46575 --- Comment #4 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2010-11-20 11:25:40 UTC --- libgcj_tools_la-tools.S.tar.bz2 is too big to upload, so i spilt it to three file. please use cat x* libgcj_tools_la-tools.S.tar.bz2