[Bug fortran/93340] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in check_constant_initializer, at fortran/trans-decl.c:5450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93340 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug fortran/39695] [F03] ProcPtr function results: wrong name in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695 --- Comment #6 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 47688 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47688=edit attempt to fix remaining issues Initial attempt at fixing the remaining issues. See attached pa

[Bug fortran/93263] [9/10 Regression] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/93175] ICE involving nested parameterized derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93175 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/93263] [9/10 Regression] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 --- Comment #12 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- Committed: master https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4a5f73449d7352ba8128fecbc9a9570d746abdb releases/gcc-9 https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f158d9197de75187fa0db26b74bc5d16b5aae242 Updated to URLs.

[Bug fortran/93263] [9/10 Regression] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/93263] [9/10 Regression] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 --- Comment #10 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is relevant: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-12/msg00082.html since the non_recursive keyword is not yet recognised by gfortran, I think it SHOULD be postponed.

[Bug fortran/93263] [9/10 Regression] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 --- Comment #9 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7) > (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #5) > > Side remark: The Fortran 2018 introduction states: > > > > "the REC

[Bug fortran/93263] [9/10 Regression] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 --- Comment #8 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- The change to: if (ns->save_all || (!flag_automatic && !recursive)) Now allows the second example program to produce: Hello 1 Hello 2 Hello

[Bug fortran/93263] [9/10 Regression] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 --- Comment #6 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #5) > (In reply to markeggleston from comment #4) > > - if (ns->save_all || !flag_automatic) > > + if (!recursiv

[Bug fortran/93263] [9/10 Regression] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |markeggleston

[Bug fortran/93263] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 --- Comment #2 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- I had thought I may have caused this but checking out release/gcc-9.2 shows that the last commit for that release was r274274 from SVN.

[Bug fortran/93263] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug fortran/81095] fcheck=bounds and empty forall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81095 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-06-15 00:00:00 |2020-1-14

[Bug fortran/93253] Regression on non-standard hex constant syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93253 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/30802] out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug fortran/39695] [F03] ProcPtr function results: wrong name in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-12-17 21:05:39 |2020-1-10

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276 Bug 19276 depends on bug 86167, which changed state. Bug 86167 Summary: allocation variable length character array in derived type incorrect https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86167 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/86167] allocation variable length character array in derived type incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86167 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/80757] Internal compiler error when omitting upper subscript of a character substring in a module subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80757 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug fortran/68155] ICE on initializing character array in type (len_lhs <> len_rhs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug fortran/38506] -std=f*: Reject scalar character to array dummy in several cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38506 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug fortran/34500] Bind(C): Character returning function with ENTRY gives ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34500 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug fortran/58334] preprocessor behavior diffs under line continuation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58334 --- Comment #3 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like macro expansion is performed in libcpp/traditional.c by the routine _cpp_scan_out_logical_line called by _cpp_read_logical_line_trad. I'm pretty sure that C style continuations

[Bug fortran/58334] preprocessor behavior diffs under line continuation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58334 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug fortran/91800] ICE in gfc_code2string(): Bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91800 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug fortran/48303] [Legacy] Support Character constants in DATA statement for non-character variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48303 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/92896] [10 Regression] [DEC] ICE in reduce_unary, at fortran/arith.c:1283

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92896 --- Comment #5 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: markeggleston Date: Thu Dec 19 15:13:25 2019 New Revision: 279583 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279583=gcc=rev Log: Prevent conversion of character data in array

<    1   2