https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107386
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16186
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107386
Bug ID: 107386
Summary: gcc/tree-core.h:588:3: error: element
'OMP_MEMORY_ORDER_UNSPECIFIED' has been implicitly
assigned 0 which another element has been assigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16186
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> FWIW, Clang implements this warning:
Oh, I was unable to find the option (only tried -Werror and -Wextra).
@Marek: please add it!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107382
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107381
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in scan_omp_target, at |ICE in scan_omp_target, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107364
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107364
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> there's also this command available:
What command does produce that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107377
Bug ID: 107377
Summary: Warn about duplicate enum values?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107364
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 53769
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53769=edit
Tentative patch
Have a patch for the ICE. Can you please output what you see with -march=native
now? Ideally if you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107373
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #3)
> 63ee540430c3 might be related wrt fixing it?
r8-4424-g63ee540430c32a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107373
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107373
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-24
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107327
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Can't reproduce the ICE with any GCC release I have:
gcc-bisect.py 'g++ -O3 -pedantic -std=c++2a -g -Wall -Wextra
-Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-address -Wno-init-list-lifetime
pr107327.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107369
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107368
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107364
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107366
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Potential fix:
diff --git a/gcc/diagnostic-format-sarif.cc b/gcc/diagnostic-format-sarif.cc
index fc28d160c38..7110db4edd6 100644
--- a/gcc/diagnostic-format-sarif.cc
+++ b/gcc/diagnostic-format-sarif.cc
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107366
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Happens for the following location:
(gdb) p /x loc
$7 = 0x8008
when I expand it:
(gdb) p x
$8 = {
file = 0x0,
line = 0,
column = 0,
data = 0x77769480,
sysp = false
}
it likely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107366
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107355
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107365
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107365
Bug ID: 107365
Summary: ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:726
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107327
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Carlos E from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > > When you say to attach a preprocessed source, what would be the most
> > > accepted command that I should be running
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107337
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107327
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> When you say to attach a preprocessed source, what would be the most
> accepted command that I should be running which can reliably show whatever
> was preprocessed?
Just append -E to the existing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107314
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
All right, I've just created upstream issue:
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?63246
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107276
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE Deducing return type|ICE Deducing return type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107332
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107326
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107326
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107323
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107323
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107322
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107321
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107317
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107329
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107329
Bug ID: 107329
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.cc:17118 since r13-2978-g43faf3e5445b5717
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105769
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Can't reproduce with huge param value with the revision before it was removed:
gcc-bisect.py 'g++ pr105769.ii -flto -O1 -ftree-vectorize --param
slp-max-insns-in-bb=1 && ./a.out' -e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107298
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> Is there some documentation explaining this, or telling Sanitizer
> users to turn off warnings-as-errors?
Unfortunately, it is not, but we should include it.
Generally speaking, -Wmaybe-uninitialized is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107314
Bug ID: 107314
Summary: New -Wsign-compare since r13-3360-g3b3083a598ca3f4b
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107312
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107310
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107308
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107307
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE tree check: expected|ICE tree check: expected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107305
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107282
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107303
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-18
Summary|[13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95569
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107301
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107300
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107302
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107302
Bug ID: 107302
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:242 since
r13-3327-g46a8e017d048ec32
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107298
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I mean warnings that are false-positives.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107298
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107296
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107297
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Sure, sorry, I forgot to send it:
template struct VecHelper {
typedef T __attribute__((vector_size(sizeof(int V;
};
template using Vec = typename VecHelper::V;
template using V = Vec<4, T>;
using F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
Bug ID: 107295
Summary: [13 Regression] Rejected code in libreoffice with -m32
since r13-3290-g98e341130f87984a
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #7)
> I believe it won't hurt to add a testcase to the test suite.
Sure, Aldy can you please do that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107293
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong code at -Os on|Wrong code at -Os on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107291
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107282
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107288
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-17
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107271
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] ICE: in |[13 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107284
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107282
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107280
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-17
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
More reduced test-case:
template struct integral_constant {
static constexpr int value = __v;
};
template using __bool_constant = integral_constant<__v>;
template struct __conditional {
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-17
Summary|ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107276
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107265
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107257
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107286
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107286
Bug ID: 107286
Summary: gcc/value-range.cc:4027: range_tests_floats: FAIL:
ASSERT_TRUE ((real_isinf (_bound (), true)))
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107261
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107257
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107257
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to shanchuan tian from comment #9)
> Dear all,
> Is this problem solved?
No.
> Can logging work properly when asan and ubsan be compiled at the same?
Sorry, but it can't be easily fixed as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107258
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107254
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > Fixed with r12-2051-g7d810646d421f697 and started with
> > r11-2453-gc89366b12ff4f362.
> >
> > @Richi: Can you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107254
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107249
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
A bit reduced test-case that can be compiled with cross compiler:
$ cat pr107160.c
#define N 16
float fl[N];
__attribute__ ((noipa, optimize (0))) void
init ()
{
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
fl[i] =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107229
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 107246 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107246
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107244
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Likely dup of PR107229.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107244
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
$ cat pr107244.c
typedef char xchar;
struct monst {
struct monst *nmon;
short movement;
char malign;
xchar mx, my;
unsigned : 7;
unsigned : 7;
unsigned : 11;
unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107244
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 regression] |[13 Regression] FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107232
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-12
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107229
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107218
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107198
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 107218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107214
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 107228, which changed state.
Bug 107228 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: in verify_range, at
value-range.cc:1147 -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107228
What|Removed
801 - 900 of 5132 matches
Mail list logo