[Bug fortran/32357] bad result from mvbits in mips version of gfortran with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-06-15 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #3 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-06-15 16:29 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is mips a big endian cpu? I can't reproduce this on > i386 or x86_64 hardware. mips can be implemented as either big endian or little endian. I have an SGI box,

[Bug fortran/32357] bad result from mvbits in mips version of gfortran with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-06-15 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #2 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-06-15 16:20 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is mips a big endian cpu? I can't reproduce this on > i386 or x86_64 hardware. mips is big endian -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32357

[Bug fortran/32357] New: bad result from mvbits in mips version of gfortran with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-06-15 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
ssigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32357

[Bug fortran/32289] mips version of gfortran produces internal compiler error

2007-06-12 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #8 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-06-12 14:33 --- (In reply to comment #7) > mips-linux-gnu, as the Debian package does. Why? When I run the configure script on an SGI Indy under Debian 4.0, it sets the system type to mips64-unknown-linux-gnu,

[Bug fortran/32289] mips version of gfortran produces internal compiler error

2007-06-12 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #6 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-06-12 14:04 --- When you build gcc and gfortran on your mips box, do you specify your system type as "mips-unknown-linux-gnu" or as "mips64-unknown-linux-gnu"? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32289

[Bug fortran/32289] mips version of gfortran produces internal compiler error

2007-06-11 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #2 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-06-11 18:39 --- I run Debian Linux 4.0 on my SGI box. When I type "apt-get source gcc-4.1", it downloads a version of gcc 4.1.2 that appears to be extensively hacked up. This version produced the refere

[Bug fortran/32289] New: mips version of gfortran produces internal compiler error

2007-06-11 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
uces internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot ric

[Bug fortran/32157] New: Can a subroutine have the same name as an intrinsic function?

2007-05-30 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32157

[Bug fortran/31972] Internal Error occurs when TRANSFER contains hollerith argument

2007-05-17 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #1 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-05-17 13:41 --- The constructor is not necessary to produce the error. It is due entirely to the TRANSFER function. -- michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/31972] New: Internal Error occurs when TRANSFER with hollerith argument appears in a constructor

2007-05-17 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31972

[Bug fortran/31609] New: gfortran segfaults when compiling a module that calls a contained function with an ENTRY point

2007-04-17 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31609

[Bug fortran/31607] New: CALL SYSTEM produces garbled output when writing to a buffered file

2007-04-17 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31607

[Bug fortran/31564] New: Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-04-13 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
oduct: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug fortran/31495] New: Is this continuation line legal?

2007-04-06 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
t_ascertain -- Summary: Is this continuation line legal? Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org Report

[Bug fortran/31494] New: spurious error: PROCEDURE attribute conflicts with DIMENSION attribute

2007-04-06 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
licts with DIMENSION attribute Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot

[Bug fortran/31474] New: insert_bbt(): Duplicate key found!

2007-04-04 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31474

[Bug fortran/31473] New: gfortran does not detect duplicate EXTERNAL or INTRINSIC declarations

2007-04-04 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/31472] New: gfortran does not detect the illegal use of an access specification in a program, subroutine, or function

2007-04-04 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug fortran/31471] New: gfortran does not detect a labeled FORALL with an unlabeled END FORALL

2007-04-04 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
unlabeled END FORALL Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http

[Bug fortran/31470] New: A program with an empty CONTAINS block is illegal, but gfortran accepts it

2007-04-04 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31470

[Bug fortran/31466] New: spurious error message when inner parentheses of a FORMAT statement are empty

2007-04-03 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
FORMAT statement are empty Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa

[Bug fortran/31463] gfortran prints no warning message when an unset return value is an array

2007-04-03 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #1 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-04-03 18:45 --- The following functions should produce a similar warning message: function test97() result(ps) character :: ps end function test97 CHARACTER(*) FUNCTION test105() i = LEN(test105) END FUNCTION test105

[Bug fortran/31465] New: spurious error: Implicitly typed PARAMETER doesn't match a later IMPLICIT type

2007-04-03 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
l Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31465

[Bug fortran/31427] TRANSFER with mold kind /= lval kind: ICE on ia64, i686; no warning

2007-04-03 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #7 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-04-03 18:08 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Could you try the following code in ia64 and i686? It works under i686. I do not have an ia64 machine. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31427

[Bug fortran/31463] New: gfortran prints no warning message when an unset return value is an array

2007-04-03 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
ichael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31463

[Bug fortran/31428] New: When I compile the following program I get the message "GNU MP: Cannot reallocate memory"

2007-04-02 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
"GNU MP: Cannot reallocate memory" Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot r

[Bug fortran/31427] New: When I compile the following program I get the message "GNU MP: Cannot reallocate memory"

2007-04-02 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
"GNU MP: Cannot reallocate memory" Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot r

[Bug fortran/31395] New: Colon edit descriptor is ignored unless preceded by a comma or a slash

2007-03-29 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
nedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31395

[Bug fortran/31366] New: When the last record written to a direct access file is shorter than the record length of the file, gfortran truncates the record

2007-03-26 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31366

[Bug fortran/31299] I can produce the bug without using nohup

2007-03-22 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #10 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-03-22 13:53 --- Several commenters believe the problem is with nohup rather than gfortran. I can produce the bug without using nohup. I redirect the input to a file: gfortran test_getlog.f90 ./a.out http

[Bug fortran/31299] getlog returns blanks when not run from the command prompt

2007-03-21 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #2 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-03-21 16:59 --- Subject: Re: getlog returns blanks when not run from the command prompt I am running SuSE Linux 10.2 At 12:49 PM 3/21/2007, you wrote: >--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot

[Bug fortran/31299] New: getlog returns blanks when not run from the command prompt

2007-03-21 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31299

[Bug fortran/30146] Redefining do-variable in excecution cycle

2007-03-21 Thread michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
--- Comment #3 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-03-21 16:15 --- The following program causes an infinite loop in gfortran, but not in other fortrans. PROGRAM do_index_in_call DO i = 1, 1 CALL SUB(i) ENDDO END PROGRAM do_index_in_call SUBROUTINE sub(i) i = 2 END

<    1   2