[Bug bootstrap/63204] New: gtype-desc.c:887:40: error: 'struct loop' has no member named 'former_header' breaks bootstrap

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mikpelinux at gmail dot com Attempting to bootstrap latest gcc-5 snapshot (20140907, aka r215005) fails with: g++ -c -g -DIN_GCC-fno-exceptions

[Bug c/63189] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect results from trivial loop when optimized with O3 or O2+tree vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63189 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/62663] m68k / coldfire : compiling with -msep-data breaks the code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62663 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Without -msep-data gcc outputs jsr square_test With -msep-data gcc outputs move.l square_test@GOT(%a5),%a0 jsr (%a0) Is that move.l unavailable

[Bug ipa/62015] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ipa-cp-clone uses a clone that is too specialized for the call context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62015 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug c/62031] Different results between O2 and O3 for gcc-4.7.2-5 (Debian 4.7.2-5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug tree-optimization/61964] [4.8 regression] krb5 database propagation enters infinite loop; reduced test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61964 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug c++/61863] Data corruption when creating temporary object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61863 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- This was fixed for 4.9 by r205694 (PR59374).

[Bug c++/61863] Data corruption when creating temporary object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61863 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug c++/61860] Internal compiler error Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61860 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- You ran out of RAM during the g++ job so the kernel killed it. You need more RAM (preferably), or to add some swap (unpleasant but sometimes necessary).

[Bug c++/61851] Compiling litecoin results in internal compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61851 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- You ran out of RAM. Add some swap.

[Bug bootstrap/61797] New: [4.10 regression] 'bool decl_in_symtab_p(const_tree)' defined but not used error breaks x86_64-linux bootstrap

: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mikpelinux at gmail dot com Attempting to bootstrap gcc-4.10-20140713 (r212499) on x86_64-linux fails with: /mnt

[Bug bootstrap/61797] [4.10 regression] 'bool decl_in_symtab_p(const_tree)' defined but not used error breaks x86_64-linux bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61797 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- decl_in_symtab_p is used under #ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING by symtab_get_node (also in craph.h), and unconditionally by fold-const.c:tree_single_nonzero_warnv_p. Sticking

[Bug fortran/61680] vectorization gives wrong answer for sandybridge target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/61622] internal compiler error: in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61622 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- This _is_ a dup of PR57431 -- unfortunately PR57431 didn't fill out the known to work or known to fail fields, so you might think it only applied to trunk-to-be-4.9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/61518] [4.10 Regression] wrong code (by tree vectorizer) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61518 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Isn't this fixed now?

[Bug tree-optimization/61517] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61517 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Isn't this fixed now?

[Bug rtl-optimization/60947] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Unable to handle kernel paging request (linux kernel 2.6.28.9) with gcc 4.9 release

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947 --- Comment #16 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to amker from comment #15) Well, only thing suspicious that I can see, the memset function is a special implementation and not from C standard library. Basically

[Bug target/61616] Internal compiler error during reload in gcc-4.7.4 configured as a cross-compiler for a mips target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61616 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Upstream support for gcc-4.7 has just ended. Please try gcc-4.8.3 or gcc-4.9.0 instead and report whether they work or not.

[Bug target/61570] -march=native CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction under QEMU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Well, qemu seems confused (as usual). Having lm and lahf_lmin the CPUID feature flags and a 48-bit virtual address space implies being 64-bit, but Intel Family 6 Model 13

[Bug target/61570] -march=native CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction under QEMU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug middle-end/57625] internal compiler error: seg fault when building gcc 4.7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- The failure of 4.7 being built w/ --disable-bootstrap by 4.8+ stopped with the PR54638 fix in r191605. It's clear that the problem was undefined behaviour in 4.7.2

[Bug middle-end/57625] internal compiler error: seg fault when building gcc 4.7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- The failure of gcc-4.8.0 and later to build gcc-4.7.2 w/ --disable-bootstrap started with r186592. I'm getting loads of errors from glibc stating that malloc detects memory

[Bug middle-end/57625] internal compiler error: seg fault when building gcc 4.7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/48576] wrong code when accessing variables in a large stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48576 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- This got fixed for 4.9+ by Bernd Schmidt's Fix for reloads_unique_chain_p patch in r203596: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg01041.html. The patch submission

[Bug rtl-optimization/50588] gcc produce incorrect inlined code with -march=athlon -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588 --- Comment #18 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- This is now fixed for 4.8+ by Eric's PR60452 patch. Verified by backporting that to 4.6.4 and seeing the bug on this PR's test case go away.

[Bug target/61131] [4.8 regression] ARM -Os: incorrect code generation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61131 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Stephen Warren from comment #3) Or is the definition of undefined such that it propagates through the entire expression irrespective of the expression's logic

[Bug middle-end/61045] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Wrong constant folding

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61045 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug middle-end/61045] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Wrong constant folding

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61045 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- According to my bisection it did start with r117931.

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #46 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Using a binutils with the proposed patch for binutils' PR 16858 I can now bootstrap gcc-4.8.2 with --disable-sjlj-exceptions on Cygwin.

[Bug target/60910] New: [4.10 regression] sparc-linux bootstrap failure due to many invalid conversion from 'int' to 'machine_mode' errors

: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mikpelinux at gmail dot com Attempting to bootstrap gcc-4.10-20140420 (r209538) on sparc64-linux fails with: g

[Bug target/60822] Index register overwritten on m68k/coldfire

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60822 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Switching gcc 4.10 to use LRA instead does not fix this wrong-code.

[Bug bootstrap/60830] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- I'm getting a different error bootstrapping the 4.9.0 RC on Cygwin: checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: in `/home/mikpe/objdir/i686-pc-cygwin

[Bug target/60822] Index register overwritten on m68k/coldfire

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60822 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug target/60822] Index register overwritten on m68k/coldfire

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60822 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- All versions from current 4.10/trunk down to and including 4.4.7 have the bug, but 4.3.6 does not. The code from 4.3.6 is similar to the one from 4.4.7, but due to a subtle

[Bug target/60822] Index register overwritten on m68k/coldfire

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60822 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Started with r140275: 2008-09-11 Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de * config/m68k/m68k.h (IRA_COVER_CLASSES): Define. which seems to enable IRA for M68K. The code

[Bug tree-optimization/60766] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong optimization with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60766 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug target/60504] [4.9 regression] many Ada testsuite regressions on ARM/Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60504 --- Comment #12 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #10) (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9) That's good news, thanks. Did you do a testsuite run for all languages

[Bug middle-end/60429] [4.7 Regression] Miscompilation (aliasing) with -finline-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60429 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug middle-end/54561] incorrect setjmp -Wclobber diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54561 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Matthieu Patou from comment #3) volatile proto_tree *tmptree = NULL; Try proto_tree * volatile tmptree = NULL; It's the variable itself that needs

[Bug ada/60504] [4.9 regression] many Ada testsuite regressions with gcc-4.9-20140309 on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60504 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #5) Sorry, no joy. With Eric's suggested patch I still got: Correction: Eric's suggested patch does work. In my previous attempt

[Bug ada/60504] [4.9 regression] many Ada testsuite regressions with gcc-4.9-20140309 on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60504 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9) That's good news, thanks. Did you do a testsuite run for all languages? Sorry, didn't have time for that -- the repeated 4.9

[Bug ada/60504] [4.9 regression] many Ada testsuite regressions with gcc-4.9-20140309 on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60504 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #6) that would be r208419 and r208150 Reverting r208150 + r208419 and rebuilding from scratch eliminated all acats regressions.

[Bug rtl-optimization/57425] [4.8 Regression] RTL alias analysis unprepared to handle stack slot sharing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57425 --- Comment #18 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Bill, the backport patch has now been approved: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00792.html

[Bug c++/60516] cc1plus crashes compiling a method with a huge struct as argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60516 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug c++/60516] [4.9/4.8 regression]: cc1plus crashes compiling a method with a huge struct as argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60516 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Started with r171890.

[Bug ada/60504] [4.9 regression] many Ada testsuite regressions with gcc-4.9-20140309 on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60504 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3) Nothing obvious stands out. I presume that exceptions cannot be caught? OK, it's presumably http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-12

[Bug rtl-optimization/57425] [4.8 Regression] RTL alias analysis unprepared to handle stack slot sharing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57425 --- Comment #17 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- The backport patch has now been submitted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00758.html

[Bug ada/60504] [4.9 regression] many Ada testsuite regressions with gcc-4.9-20140309 on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60504 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Sorry, no joy. With Eric's suggested patch I still got: === acats tests === Running chapter a ... FAIL: a87b59a Running chapter c2 ... Running chapter c3

[Bug rtl-optimization/57425] [4.8 Regression] RTL alias analysis unprepared to handle stack slot sharing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57425 --- Comment #13 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 32343 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32343action=edit 4.8 backport of Joern's fixes This is the backport of Joern's fixes to 4.8 I did

[Bug rtl-optimization/57425] [4.8 Regression] RTL alias analysis unprepared to handle stack slot sharing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57425 --- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Bill, I can submit the patch on Saturday (too busy before then), but I don't have commit rights so someone else will have to commit it (assuming it's approved). /Mikael

[Bug ada/51483] [4.7/4.8/4.9 regression] cstand.adb:Register_Float_Type makes invalid assumption about FP modes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51483 --- Comment #25 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Thanks!

[Bug ada/60504] New: [4.9 regression] many Ada testsuite regressions with gcc-4.9-20140309 on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mikpelinux at gmail dot com With gcc-4.9-20140309 I see the following testsuite regressions on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi compared to the previous working

[Bug tree-optimization/60452] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting trunk and 4.8.x)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60452 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug ada/60411] ADA canadian cross build fails.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug c/60388] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xb7fb62ff in __pthread_create_2_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60388 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- User error. s/pthread_create(tid,/pthread_create(tid1[i],/g fixes it, as gcc's warnings correctly identified.

[Bug other/60336] va_start corrupts 6-th argument in case of empty type used before the format string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug middle-end/52306] [4.8 regression] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 --- Comment #32 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #31) After backporting the patch to 4.8 there is still a package that fails with the same error, though it doesn't fail with 4.9

[Bug rtl-optimization/60307] define_cond_exec with cc0 comparison generates wrong code, missing insn that sets cc0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60307 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Which target is this? Can you provide a test case?

[Bug c/13029] [3.4 Regression] static consts and -Wunused-variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13029 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #4) May I ask what is the design rational of not warning unused static const variables? See PR28901. There are cases of unused

[Bug tree-optimization/60229] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60229 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Technically there is an overflow there. But GCC defines conversion to a smaller signed integer type, when the value cannot be represented in that smaller type, as a non

[Bug ada/60174] ICE on ACATS cc3305a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60174 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug ada/60078] acats c761007 fails on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60078 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- This passes for me on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi with gcc trunk/4.8/4.7, on real HW (Kirkwood), glibc-2.17, linux-3.13 kernel.

[Bug ada/60078] acats c761007 fails on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60078 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4) This passes for me on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi with gcc trunk/4.8/4.7, on real HW (Kirkwood), glibc-2.17, linux-3.13 kernel

[Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- There are also Haswells that lack BMI2. I updated our dynamic binary instrumentation engine for AVX2 about a year ago, but while our Haswell box at the time had AVX2 it didn't

[Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #4) (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #3) There are also Haswells that lack BMI2. I updated our dynamic binary

[Bug c/59946] -mpcrel -O2 produces illegal asm code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59946 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Reproduced with m68k-elf and m68k-linux toolchains built from binutils-2.23.2 and gcc-4.9-20140119, 4.8.2, and 4.7.3. Removing -m68000 causes the .l suffix to disappear and gas

[Bug middle-end/59719] Too much space allocated to unions containing variable length arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59719 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Related to / dup of PR28865 and PR57180 ?

[Bug c/59674] On m68k and vax variables stack variables with MAX_STACK_ALIGNMENT make ssp fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59674 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Works, as in generates OK looking code w/o issuing any diagnostics, on both m68k-linux and vax-linux for me. A NetBSD issue?

[Bug c/59674] On m68k and vax variables stack variables with MAX_STACK_ALIGNMENT make ssp fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59674 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- I tested both targets with cross compilers from x86_64-linux. I also tested natively on m68k-linux.

[Bug c/59674] On m68k and vax variables stack variables with MAX_STACK_ALIGNMENT make ssp fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59674 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Christos Zoulas from comment #4) My guess is that m68k-linux is not using the SVR4 ABI, i.e. it does not require long long and double to be aligned

[Bug middle-end/52306] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 --- Comment #24 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- So where does that leave us? Disable -fauto-inc-dec by default, or try to make m68k work with LRA (which hopefully should avoid this reload bug)?

[Bug c/52773] internal error: in replace_pseudos_in, at reload1.c:577

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to fdarkangel from comment #8) Persists in gcc 4.8.2. Try Bernd's patch, see link in comment #7.

[Bug bootstrap/59536] New: [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mikpelinux at gmail dot com Attempting to bootstrap gcc-4.9-20131215 (r206004) on m68k-linux fails with: /mnt/scratch

[Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug middle-end/59011] [4.7 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59011 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- It appears the test case wasn't added to 4.8 branch.

[Bug middle-end/59134] Infinite loop between store_fixed_bit_field and store_split_bit_field with STRICT_ALIGNMENT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59134 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Started with r163189.

[Bug target/59187] internal error with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59187 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- I can reproduce the ICE with 4.8.1 configured as a cross to x86_64-w64-mingw32 hosted on x86_64-linux, but not with 4.8.2. Looks like you need to upgrade.

[Bug bootstrap/59206] [4.9 regression] many bootstrap comparison failures on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59206 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/59206] New: [4.9 regression] many bootstrap comparison failures on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi

: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mikpelinux at gmail dot com Attempting to bootstrap gcc-4.9-20131117 on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi fails with many bootstrap comparison failures: Comparing stages 2 and 3

[Bug bootstrap/59206] [4.9 regression] many bootstrap comparison failures on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59206 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #1) Can you try it again at SVN revision r205061. Retrying at that rev ...

[Bug target/59196] ./configure --with-cpu is broken for some m68k targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59196 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug middle-end/59134] Infinite loop between store_fixed_bit_field and store_split_bit_field with STRICT_ALIGNMENT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59134 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug c/59138] [4.8/4.9 Regression] possible packed struct miscompile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59138 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug tree-optimization/59139] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_val_for, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:2267

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59139 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #5) So far we were not even able to reproduce it. Building gcc trunk as a cross to ppc64-linux reproduces the build failure for me.

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug tree-optimization/58921] [4.9 Regression] ICE with segfault on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58921 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug regression/58985] [4.9 Regression]: gcc.dg/pr57518.c scan-rtl-dump-not ira REG_EQUIV...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58985 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug tree-optimization/58956] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above (affecting gcc 4.6 to trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug other/58936] wrong Makefile generated when gmp/mpfr/mpc installed in custom folder

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58936 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Liu Jian from comment #0) I configured gcc using: ./configure --prefix=$HOME --with-gmp=$HOME --with-mpfr=$HOME --with-mpc=$HOME When I am compiling gcc 4.8.2

[Bug c/58943] wrong calculation of indirect structure member arithmetic via function call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58943 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug rtl-optimization/58369] [4.8 regression] ICE in subreg_get_info when compiling boost for m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58369 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0

[Bug target/58854] [4.8 regression] sub sp, fp, #40 hoisted above frame accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug tree-optimization/58830] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting 4.8.x, but not trunk or 4.7.x)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58830 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug tree-optimization/58830] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting 4.8.x, but not trunk or 4.7.x)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58830 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Started with r193882.

[Bug tree-optimization/58831] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58831 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug rtl-optimization/58779] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58779 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz

[Bug rtl-optimization/58759] [4.9 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58759 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc

[Bug inline-asm/58805] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Inline assembly wrongly optimized out when inside a conditional

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58805 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug tree-optimization/58696] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58696 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Broke with r203061, works again with r203463, likely dup of PR58640.

<    1   2   3   4   5   >