[Bug other/80895] format not a string literal and no format arguments; in GCC itself

2017-05-26 Thread miloradovsky at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80895 Andrew Miloradovsky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/80895] format not a string literal and no format arguments; in GCC itself

2017-05-26 Thread miloradovsky at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80895 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Miloradovsky --- After all I might simply insert that comment everywhere, to reduce confusion.

[Bug other/80895] format not a string literal and no format arguments; in GCC itself

2017-05-26 Thread miloradovsky at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80895 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Miloradovsky --- Hmm, man printf(3) doesn't tell anything about the formats, what are they for?

[Bug other/80895] format not a string literal and no format arguments; in GCC itself

2017-05-26 Thread miloradovsky at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80895 Andrew Miloradovsky changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41428|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug other/80895] New: format not a string literal and no format arguments; in GCC itself

2017-05-26 Thread miloradovsky at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: miloradovsky at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 41428 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41428=edit a trivial patch GCC could