[Bug c++/113360] [13/14 Regression] Truncated constexpr error messages with -std=c++23/26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113360 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Idea: use cp_function_chain->invalid_constexpr to not to attempt to explain_invalid_constexpr_fn.

[Bug c++/113427] ICE: tree check: C++23 `this auto` lambda + multiple (ambiguous) inheritance from closure type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113427 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/113360] [13/14 Regression] Truncated constexpr error messages with -std=c++23/26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113360 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- The "deducing from brace-enclosed initializer" error is emitted during parsing from listify. The body of init_list is not potentially-constant (due to erroneous FOR_COND), so we register_constexpr_fundef

[Bug c++/110065] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [C++20/2b] auto return type in template argument causes ICE, also accepts-invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110065 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- With -std=c++20 the ICE started with r12-4772.

[Bug c++/113347] [12/13 Regression] ICE during gimplification building TVM since r13-8079-gd237e7b291ff52

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/113389] ICE when explicit object parameter is not declared as the first parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113389 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug c++/110997] [13 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:8005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|mpolacek at gcc

[Bug c++/113340] [14 Regression] ICE when an explicit object parameter is attempted to be used in a destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113340 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE when an explicit object |[14 Regression] ICE when an

[Bug testsuite/113366] New: g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113366 Bug ID: 113366 Summary: g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C FAIL Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug c++/111272] [13/14 Regression] Truncated error messages with -std=c++23 and -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111272 --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Paul Keir from comment #8) > I wonder if a small part of this bug still remains. You're right, there's still something bad. I've opened bug 113360 for it.

[Bug c++/113360] [13/14 Regression] Truncated constexpr error messages with -std=c++23/26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113360 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/113360] [13/14 Regression] Truncated constexpr error messages with -std=c++23/26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113360 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.3 Summary|Truncated

[Bug c++/113360] New: Truncated constexpr error messages with -std=c++23/26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113360 Bug ID: 113360 Summary: Truncated constexpr error messages with -std=c++23/26 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/89072] -Wall -Werror should be defaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89072 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/110065] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [C++20/2b] auto return type in template argument causes ICE, also accepts-invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110065 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/110065] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [C++20/2b] auto return type in template argument causes ICE, also accepts-invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110065 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/113340] ICE when an explicit object parameter is attempted to be used in a destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113340 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- I suppose the following would be one way to fix it: --- a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc @@ -312,6 +312,12 @@ maybe_retrofit_in_chrg (tree fn) basetype = TREE_TYPE (TREE_VALUE (arg_types));

[Bug c++/113340] ICE when an explicit object parameter is attempted to be used in a destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113340 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Ever

[Bug c++/113300] GCC rejects valid program involving copy list initialization A a = {} of a class with explicit and non explicit default constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113300 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-10 CC|

[Bug c++/113272] Wrong specialization of class template selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113272 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/113158] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Erroneous "looser exception specification" error for class template and depedent noexcept value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113158 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/113083] [14 Regression][arm] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2602 since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113083 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- The problem occurs only when we declone cdtors and are on a targetm.cxx.cdtor_returns_this target like ARM. Decloning causes us to create a thunk calling the "main" ctor: A* A::A (A *const this) {

[Bug c++/113108] Internal compiler error when choosing overload for operator=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113108 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Seems to have started r7-4383.

[Bug c++/113083] [14 Regression][arm] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2602 since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113083 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- The ICE can be reproduced with -O -fdeclone-ctor-dtor as well.

[Bug c++/112908] __reference_{converts,constructs}_from_temporary checks for move constructor when binding prvalue to reference of the same type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112908 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/113069] gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc:143:12: warning: private field 'curr_generation' is not used [-Wunused-private-field]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113069 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/113069] gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc:143:12: warning: private field 'curr_generation' is not used [-Wunused-private-field]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113069 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/113083] [14 Regression][arm] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2602 since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113083 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Previously we had: { return A::A (this); } now: { return *this = {}; }

[Bug c++/113064] assignement from temporary sometimes invokes copy-assign instead of move-assign operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113064 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to m.cencora from comment #4) > This also might be a just another symptom of the same root cause: > > struct bar > { > bar() = default; > > bar(const bar&); > bar(bar&&); > >

[Bug c++/113083] [14 Regression][arm] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2602 since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113083 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug c++/113064] assignement from temporary sometimes invokes copy-assign instead of move-assign operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113064 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/112482] error when auto(x) is used in a variable initializer (block scope)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112482 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/112869] [14 Regression] ICE at gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:17531 on libopenmpt-0.7.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112869 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/113003] ICE: in expand_mult, at expmed.cc:3603 at -O with __builtin_mul_overflow_p() and _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113003 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/112989] GC ICE with C++, `#include ` and `-fsanitize=address`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/109876] [11/12 Regression] initializer_list not usable in constant expressions in a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/110106] [11/12 Regression] ICE on noexcept(noexcept(...)) with optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110106 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/112410] error when auto(x) is used in a variable initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112410 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88848] member ambiguous in multiple inheritance lattice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88848 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/88848] member ambiguous in multiple inheritance lattice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88848 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/108032] internal compiler error : in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108032 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug target/112762] [14 Regression] Cannot build crosscompilers for some uclinux targets since r14-5791-g24592abd68e6ef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112762 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112762] [14 Regression] Cannot build crosscompilers for some uclinux targets since r14-5791-g24592abd68e6ef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112762 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/112869] [14 Regression] ICE at gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:17531 on libopenmpt-0.7.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112869 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- This should fix it: --- a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc @@ -1177,13 +1177,9 @@ cp_fold_immediate_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk_subtrees, void *data_) ? tf_error :

[Bug c++/112869] [14 Regression] ICE at gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:17531 on libopenmpt-0.7.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112869 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/112867] [11/12/13/14 Regression] extern function declaration inside a generic (templated) lambda inside a template function goes wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112867 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- This worked in GCC 7. GCC 8 started ICEing with r8-2720-gf44a8dd56f5bfb commit f44a8dd56f5bfbd0596c39693e268ef880c06221 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tue Aug 29 16:37:15 2017 -0400 Reimplement

[Bug c++/107687] [C++23] P2564 - consteval needs to propagate up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107687 Bug 107687 depends on bug 110997, which changed state. Bug 110997 Summary: [13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:8005 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997 What

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 110997, which changed state. Bug 110997 Summary: [13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:8005 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997 What

[Bug c++/110997] [13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:8005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98940] Implement C++23 language features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940 Bug 98940 depends on bug 107687, which changed state. Bug 107687 Summary: [C++23] P2564 - consteval needs to propagate up https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107687 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/107687] [C++23] P2564 - consteval needs to propagate up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107687 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/70819] constexpr error location wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70819 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 70819, which changed state. Bug 70819 Summary: constexpr error location wrong https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70819 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/112795] [C++>=14] ICE pragma GCC unroll (n) cxx_eval_constant_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112795 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/112744] Nested name specifier wrongly produces ambiguity in accessing static field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112744 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/98940] Implement C++23 language features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940 Bug 98940 depends on bug 106650, which changed state. Bug 106650 Summary: [C++23] P2280 - Using unknown references in constant expressions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106650 What|Removed

[Bug c++/106650] [C++23] P2280 - Using unknown references in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106650 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/112762] [14 Regression] Cannot build crosscompilers for some uclinux targets since r14-5791-g24592abd68e6ef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112762 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- I'm not really sure what the problem is but I wonder if this would help: --- a/gcc/config/linux.h +++ b/gcc/config/linux.h @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively. If

[Bug tree-optimization/112766] [14 regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized with array new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112766 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/112765] [14 regression] -Wparentheses warning even when extra parens are present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112765 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/112744] Nested name specifier wrongly produces ambiguity in accessing static field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112744 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/112744] Nested name specifier wrongly produces ambiguity in accessing static field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112744 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug sanitizer/112727] UBSAN creates GIMPLE path with uninitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112727 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/106650] [C++23] P2280 - Using unknown references in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106650 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/106650] [C++23] P2280 - Using unknown references in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106650 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- With just --- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc @@ -7378,6 +7378,8 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t, r = build_constructor (TREE_TYPE (t), NULL);

[Bug c++/112410] error when auto(x) is used in a variable initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112410 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed on trunk so far; I want to fix it in 13 too.

[Bug c++/112427] [14 regression] ICE when building Minetest (internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in get_inner_reference, at

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112427 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- *** Bug 112516 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/112516] [14 regression] ICE when building MySQL (ree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in get_inner_reference, at expr.cc:7943)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112516 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/112515] [14 regression] ICE when building Transmission in standard_conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112515 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/112482] error when auto(x) is used in a variable initializer (block scope)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112482 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/112482] New: error when auto(x) is used in a variable initializer (block scope)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112482 Bug ID: 112482 Summary: error when auto(x) is used in a variable initializer (block scope) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/89867] internal compiler error: in layout_type, at stor-layout.c:2578

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89867 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/112456] Diagnostic for [[nodiscard]] on a constructor could be improved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112456 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug c++/112410] error when auto(x) is used in a variable initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112410 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/112410] error when auto(x) is used in a variable initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112410 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/112365] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE on invalid C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112365 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/112288] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE - internal compiler error: in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.cc:26861

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112288 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > (In reply to Fabio Alemagna from comment #4) > > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > > > Confirmed. Started with r6-6830-g20a0c6f9bdbd78: > > > > >

[Bug c++/112288] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE - internal compiler error: in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.cc:26861

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112288 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- // PR c++/112288 namespace { template class counter { public: template static constexpr int next() { return next(0)*Step+Start; } private: template struct slot { template friend

[Bug c++/112288] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE - internal compiler error: in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.cc:26861

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112288 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection |ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/111895] error: invalid operands of types 'unsigned char:2' and 'int' to binary 'operator!=' on enum class bitfield cast to bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111895 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99804] cannot convert bit field enum to its own type in a template member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99804 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/111895] error: invalid operands of types 'unsigned char:2' and 'int' to binary 'operator!=' on enum class bitfield cast to bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111895 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/111884] [13/14 Regression] unsigned char no longer aliases anything under -std=c2x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111884 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rust/111899] [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with 'rust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was not declared in this scope'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/111883] Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82165] Operator overloading doesn't work with enum bit fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82165 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/104068] ICE Segmentation fault with type alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104068 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/99757] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:7736

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99757 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/111883] Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/111883] Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Did you mean like the following? I have no idea if that's correct but is suppresses the warnings I see. In C++23 I don't see the code in the .ii file at all, so it doesn't warn. ---

[Bug c/111884] unsigned char no longer aliases anything under -std=c2x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111884 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug testsuite/111883] New: Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 Bug ID: 111883 Summary: Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26 Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/89038] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunknown-pragmas" does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89038 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/111840] =delete("can have a reason")?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111840 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 111660, which changed state. Bug 111660 Summary: [14 Regression] Compilation of constexpr function returning enum takes exponential time with -std=c++2a since r14-4140-g6851e3423c2b5e

[Bug c++/111660] [14 Regression] Compilation of constexpr function returning enum takes exponential time with -std=c++2a since r14-4140-g6851e3423c2b5e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/111840] =delete("can have a reason")?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111840 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/111272] [13/14 Regression] Truncated error messages with -std=c++23 and -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111272 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/111222] ICE on basic_string_view and alias templates with missing template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111222 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >