[Bug c++/93810] missing -Wmismatched-tags and -Wredundant-tags on a typedef of an implicit class template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93810 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/101600] [12 Regression] Spurious -Warray-bounds downcasting a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101600 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor

[Bug tree-optimization/101977] [12 Regression] array subscript 0 is outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101977 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug tree-optimization/102006] A false warning "Array subscript -N is outside array bounds warning"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102006 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||56456 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/101977] [12 Regression] array subscript 0 is outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101977 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/101977] array subscript 0 is outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101977 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/101984] [12 Regression] gimple-ssa-warn-access memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101984 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug other/101984] [12 Regression] gimple-ssa-warn-access memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101984 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/101953] bug on the default cast operator from double to unsigned short

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101953 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/101854] [11 Regression] Invalid warning -Wstringop-overflow wrong argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101854 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] Invalid |[11 Regression] Invalid

[Bug jit/101942] many jit test failures (test-accessing-bitfield.c.exe et al.)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101942 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/101940] Implement -fignored-attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101940 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug jit/101942] New: many jit test failures (test-accessing-bitfield.c.exe et al.)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101942 Bug ID: 101942 Summary: many jit test failures (test-accessing-bitfield.c.exe et al.) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/101831] Spurious maybe-uninitialized warning on std::array::size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101831 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/101912] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm in tzdb localtime.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101912 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/100406] bogus/missing -Wmismatched-new-delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100406 Bug 100406 depends on bug 101791, which changed state. Bug 101791 Summary: missing warning on a mismatch between scalar and array forms of new and delete https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101791 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/101791] missing warning on a mismatch between scalar and array forms of new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101791 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 101734, which changed state. Bug 101734 Summary: missing warning reading from a write-only object https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101734 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/101734] missing warning reading from a write-only object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101734 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/51545] missing -Wparentheses diagnostic with compound assignment used as condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51545 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.2.0, 12.0, 4.1.0 Last

[Bug c++/101833] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wformat on a constructor with a virtual base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101833 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.0, 11.2.0, 12.0 --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/101854] [11/12 Regression] Invalid warning -Wstringop-overflow wrong argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101854 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/101854] [11/12 Regression] Invalid warning -Wstringop-overflow wrong argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101854 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug middle-end/88781] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-truncation warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88781 Bug 88781 depends on bug 101451, which changed state. Bug 101451 Summary: Incorrect -Wstringop-truncation warning https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101451 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/101451] Incorrect -Wstringop-truncation warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101451 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID CC|

[Bug middle-end/101829] problems with inline + __attribute__ ((malloc (deallocator)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101829 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||99715 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/101830] [12 Regression] Incorrect error messages beginning with r12-2591 (backward jump threader)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101830 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor

[Bug tree-optimization/101830] [12 Regression] Incorrect error messages beginning with r12-2591 (backward jump threader)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101830 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 51298 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51298=edit Change to test case that avoids -Warray-bounds. The attached change to test case avoids all -Warray-bounds instances.

[Bug tree-optimization/101830] [12 Regression] Incorrect error messages beginning with r12-2591 (backward jump threader)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101830 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- I've only looked at the first warning so far. It's issued for the access in bb 8: [local count: 4057510040]: pos.80_31 = pos; if (pos.80_31 <= 1023) goto ; [96.34%] else goto ; [3.66%]

[Bug tree-optimization/101793] Incorrect -Wmaybe-uninitialized on an unreachable use at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101793 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/101793] Incorrect production of ‘may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101793 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/96989] SSA_NAMEs in Wuninitialized warning messages after r11-959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96989 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- The tree pretty-printer would do better by obviating the internal differences: e.g., it could convert the IL for h(): a = __builtin_malloc (_1); _2 = a + 8; _3 = *_2; directly to a[2].

[Bug middle-end/96989] SSA_NAMEs in Wuninitialized warning messages after r11-959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96989 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/101799] Warning messages for PMF leak internal names like ::__pfn and ::__delta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101799 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- PR 96989 is related only in that it also involves the pretty printer. Otherwise, to avoid SSA_NAMEs the pretty-printer needs to recursively expand them into their assignments from DECLs or expressions

[Bug middle-end/101799] Warning messages for PMF leak internal names like ::__pfn and ::__delta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101799 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Blocks|

[Bug middle-end/101791] missing warning on a mismatch between scalar and array forms of new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101791 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Blocks|

[Bug middle-end/101791] New: missing warning on a mismatch between scalar and array forms of new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101791 Bug ID: 101791 Summary: missing warning on a mismatch between scalar and array forms of new and delete Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/101770] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm with only locals in GNU diffutils

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101770 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/101778] bogus -Wstringop-overread on strncmp of a larger array and a shorter string with a large bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101778 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/101778] New: bogus -Wstringop-overread on strncmp of a larger array and a shorter string with a large bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101778 Bug ID: 101778 Summary: bogus -Wstringop-overread on strncmp of a larger array and a shorter string with a large bound Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101747] Two-argument version of attribute malloc does not perform overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101747 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/101741] [12 Regression] ICE in fold_stmt, at gimple-range-fold.cc:541 since r12-2517-g1ce0b26e6e1e6c34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101741 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/101688] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails on 32-bit archs with new jump threader

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101688 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/101688] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails on 32-bit archs with new jump threader

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101688 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/101688] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails on 32-bit archs with new jump threader

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101688 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/101751] asan_test.C fails with excess error with glibc-2.34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101751 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/101734] missing warning reading from a write-only object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101734 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/101734] missing warning reading from a write-only object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101734 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/101734] New: missing warning reading from a write-only object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101734 Bug ID: 101734 Summary: missing warning reading from a write-only object Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/58169] missed load PRE related to array index truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58169 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/101525] "out of the bounds" warning for an innocuous memset call with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101525 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||56456 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/101702] [12 Regression] ICE: in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3623

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101702 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/79062] -Walloca-larger-than and -Wformat-overflow warnings disabled by -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79062 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---

[Bug lto/79062] -Walloca-larger-than and -Wformat-overflow warnings disabled by -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79062 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-01-12 00:00:00 |2021-7-30 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/101679] triplicate warning offset outside bounds of constant string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101679 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- For the code in comment #1, the first warning is issued from the front end, the second one from the Gimplifier, and the last one just before expansion. The first one still has the right location. The

[Bug middle-end/101679] triplicate warning offset outside bounds of constant string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101679 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|duplicate warning offset|triplicate warning offset

[Bug middle-end/101679] New: duplicate warning offset outside bounds of constant string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101679 Bug ID: 101679 Summary: duplicate warning offset outside bounds of constant string Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/101671] pr83510 fails with -Os because threader confuses -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101671 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug middle-end/101674] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c fails after jump threading rewrite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101674 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug middle-end/101665] -fno-delete-null-pointer checks ineffective for attribute nonnull parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101665 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-29

[Bug middle-end/101665] New: -fno-delete-null-pointer checks ineffective for attribute nonnull parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101665 Bug ID: 101665 Summary: -fno-delete-null-pointer checks ineffective for attribute nonnull parameters Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/101494] [11 Regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm with memrchr of size 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101494 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Fixed in GCC 12 by r12-2583. Will backport to GCC 11.

[Bug middle-end/101601] [12 Regression] -Warray-bounds triggers error: arrays of functions are not meaningful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101601 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/101662] New: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91446.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101662 Bug ID: 101662 Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91446.c Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug testsuite/101661] New: UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/ipa/remref-6.c scan-ipa-dump inline "Removed a reference"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101661 Bug ID: 101661 Summary: UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/ipa/remref-6.c scan-ipa-dump inline "Removed a reference" Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/101660] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_3.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101660 Bug ID: 101660 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_3.f90 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/99295] [9 Regression] documentation on __attribute__((malloc)) is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99295 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|10.2.1 | Summary|[9/10 Regression]

[Bug c++/101480] [11/12 Regression] Miscompiled code involving operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 101584, which changed state. Bug 101584 Summary: missing -Wuninitialized with an allocated object after a built-in call https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101584 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/101584] missing -Wuninitialized with an allocated object after a built-in call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101584 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/101585] [11 Regression] Bad interaction of -fsanitize=undefined and -Wvla-parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101585 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] Bad |[11 Regression] Bad

[Bug bootstrap/101574] gcc/sparseset.h:215:20: error: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Werror=parentheses]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- The symptom in comment #6 does look similar to the problem discussed in pr101292. I haven't debugged it yet but when developing the warning control patch I struggled with keeping the garbage collector from

[Bug middle-end/101600] [12 Regression] Spurious -Warray-bounds downcasting a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101600 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- There's another bug here that can be reproduced with the following slightly modified version of the original test case: $ cat pr101600-c2.C && /build/gcc-master/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-master/gcc -O2 -S

[Bug middle-end/101600] [12 Regression] Spurious -Warray-bounds downcasting a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101600 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||56456 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/101605] New: bogus -Wvla-parameter in same bound expression with differently named parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101605 Bug ID: 101605 Summary: bogus -Wvla-parameter in same bound expression with differently named parameters Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/101289] [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-paramater warning when using const for vla param

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101289 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|bogus -Wvla-paramater |[11 Regression] bogus

[Bug c/97548] [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression involving a parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- The fix isn't very robust since it only handles redeclarations with VLA parameters that involve bounds that have the same name but not nontrivial expressions involving different names, like in this case: $

[Bug c/101604] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wvla-parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101604 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/101604] New: [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wvla-parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101604 Bug ID: 101604 Summary: [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wvla-parameter Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/97548] [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression involving a parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|bogus -Wvla-parameter on a |[11 Regression] bogus

[Bug middle-end/101601] [12 Regression] -Warray-bounds triggers error: arrays of functions are not meaningful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101601 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/101597] [12 Regression] ICE in pretty-printer formatting an OBJ_TYPE_REF since r12-2132-ga110855667782dac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101597 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |c++ Summary|[12 Regression]

[Bug c/101585] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction of -fsanitize=undefined and -Wvla-parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101585 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2

[Bug c/101585] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction of -fsanitize=undefined and -Wvla-parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101585 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Bad interaction of |[11/12 Regression] Bad

[Bug tree-optimization/101494] [11 Regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm with memrchr of size 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101494 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/101584] missing -Wuninitialized with an allocated object after a built-in call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101584 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/101584] New: missing -Wuninitialized with an allocated object after a built-in call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101584 Bug ID: 101584 Summary: missing -Wuninitialized with an allocated object after a built-in call Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 65178, which changed state. Bug 65178 Summary: incorrect -Wmaybe-uninitialized when using nested loops https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65178 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/65178] incorrect -Wmaybe-uninitialized when using nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65178 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/101568] [12 regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr82352.C fails after r12-2338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101568 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/101494] [11 Regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm with memrchr of size 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101494 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/101494] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm with memrchr of size 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101494 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-21

[Bug bootstrap/101379] libatomic arm build failure after r12-2132 due -Warray-bounds on a constant address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101379 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/101379] libatomic arm build failure after r12-2132 due -Warray-bounds on a constant address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101379 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/101553] [12 Regression] armhf builds broken on -Werror=array-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101553 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/101219] [12 Regression] ice in perform_or_defer_access_check since r12-1804-g65870e75616ee435

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101219 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Thanks for tracking down the change that triggers the ICE! I removed the suppression in a few cases where it served no apparent purpose (wasn't necessary to suppress warnings exercised by the test suite).

[Bug middle-end/101397] [11 Regression] spurious warning writing to the result of stpcpy minus 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101397 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.1.0 Summary|[11/12

[Bug c/63326] whether a #pragma is a statement depends on the type of pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/101538] [10/11/12 Regression] #pragma considered a statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101538 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c/101538] New: [10/11/12 Regression] #pragma considered a statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101538 Bug ID: 101538 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] #pragma considered a statement Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >