https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107550
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107550
Bug ID: 107550
Summary: incorrect templated lambda mangling
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107442
Bug ID: 107442
Summary: Concept and Template Var mangling
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101243
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99446
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99446
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99446
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Well it would be nice if it could show the token in the included file, but if
that's difficult your solution is perfectly fine. thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99605
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I removed the scans, they're too brittle, didn't realize this report was a
thing
* 671f9f5c0f0 2021-04-06 | c++: Simplify va_arg test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99380
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99283, which changed state.
Bug 99283 Summary: [modules] ICE in assert_definition, at cp/module.cc:4608
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
Bug ID: 99871
Summary: #includes inside push visibility scope
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #21 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Pants
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #19 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Yes! that seems to have done it!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #18 from Nathan Sidwell ---
* 584731ecedf 2021-04-01 | c++: inter-cluster import order [PR 99283]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #15 from Nathan Sidwell ---
another one encountered on the way ...
* 5f3c6027257 2021-03-30 | c++: duplicate const static members [PR 99283]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell ---
more fixes
* d82797420c2 2021-03-26 | c++: imported templates and alias-template changes
[PR 99283
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
found while reducing testcase
* bd71889b901 2021-03-23 | c++: Note duplicates in symbol table [PR 99283]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99731
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99239, which changed state.
Bug 99239 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: in duplicate_decls
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99239
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99239
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99484, which changed state.
Bug 99484 Summary: [modules] ICE same canonical type node for different types
‘void’ and ‘std::__void_t<_Op<_Args ...> >’
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99484
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99484
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99424
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
no longer reproduces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99480, which changed state.
Bug 99480 Summary: [modules] ICE in import_entity_index, at cp/module.cc:3952
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99480
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99480
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99480
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99425, which changed state.
Bug 99425 Summary: [modules] ICE tree check: expected tree_vec, have tree_list
in lookup_template_class_1, at cp/pt.c:9803
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99425
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99425
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99604
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Myth Plausible
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99604
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I wonder if this was an instance of 99423?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #15 from Nathan Sidwell ---
oops, I was juggling too many computers yesterday
* 7b900dca607 2021-03-15 | c++: Incorrect type equivalence [PR 99496]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99601
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
fix the builtin fails:
770d3487ef1 2021-03-15 | c++: Fix 2 testcases [PR 99601]
I'm not seeing the iostream fail thought
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #12 from Nathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99603
Bug ID: 99603
Summary: [11 regression] ICE in libstdc++ tests due to module
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99601
Bug ID: 99601
Summary: [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/iostream-1_b.C on
x86_64 with -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99484
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99424
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99483
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99482
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99238, which changed state.
Bug 99238 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99238
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99238
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99481, which changed state.
Bug 99481 Summary: [modules] ICE tree check: expected template_decl, have
function_decl in decl_value, at cp/module.cc:7938
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99481
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99528
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexander.lelyakin@googlema
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99481
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99484
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99483
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99482
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99238, which changed state.
Bug 99238 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99238
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99238
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell ---
thanks, sadly even that's not triggering it for me on a ppc system. I think
I'm going to have to make the specialization hasher really stupid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99238
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99240, which changed state.
Bug 99240 Summary: [modules] ICE in get_merge_kind, at cp/module.cc:10169
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99240
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99240
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99248, which changed state.
Bug 99248 Summary: [modules] ICE expected binding_vector, have overload in
lookup_elaborated_type_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:8013
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99248
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99248
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99248
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Cannot reproduce it on gcc135 either
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99528
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Oh, sorry. I guess it's not obvious. I need the preprocessed source from all
of the xtreme-header-3 series. Test of the form ${BASENAME}_[a-z].[CHX] are a
group compiled in ascending letter order.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
-save-temps to the compile line scraped from .log should dtrt. but yeah,
requires a bit more fidelity than before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99528
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
// bug.h
template
class new_allocator
{
public:
template
new_allocator(const new_allocator<_Tp1>&) noexcept { }
};
extern template class new_allocator;
// bug_a.H
#include "bug.h"
// bug_b.H
#include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99528
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99528
Bug ID: 99528
Summary: [modules] ICE with iostream& vector
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99423, which changed state.
Bug 99423 Summary: [modules] ICE tree check: expected tree_vec, have ggc_freed
in lookup_template_class_1, at cp/pt.c:9803
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99423
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99423
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99423
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
// bug_a.ii
template
struct pair
{
pair() { }
};
inline pair blob ()
{
return {};
}
// bug_b.ii
import "bug_a.ii";
pair boom();
./cc1plus -fmodule-header=system -std=c++20 bug_a.ii -fpreprocessed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I am not seeing this on the compile farm's 2 ppc systems I use (gcc1-power7 and
gcc2-power8). Can you extract preprocessed source for that set of header
tests?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99508
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99508
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99423
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99472
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99436
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99472
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
indeed, also enabling modules test in 2b mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99468
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99468
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
504450c708c 2021-03-08 | c++: Poor diagnostic in header-unit [PR 99468]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99285, which changed state.
Bug 99285 Summary: [modules] ICE canonical types differ for identical types
‘std::common_type...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99285
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99285
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99468
Bug ID: 99468
Summary: [modules] awkward diagnostic for named-module inside
header unit
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99456
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell ---
gcc11-pr99456.patch looks good, can we add a scan-not for the _ZGV guard
variables too? If the optimizer's turned on, I think __static_init... gets
inlined into the global constructor, might be good to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99456
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
You're misreading this particular testcase. I don't believe it contains
anything invalid -- the only constexpr is on:
static constexpr unsigned = desc;
(and I don't think it's necessary there, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99456
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
It's an ABI issue, because all compilers must agree on which parts of an inline
object are dynamically initialized. (gcc-11 does not agree with gcc-10).
consider:
inline Type Var = Expr;
That'll be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99456
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 50328
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50328=edit
trunk output (unoptimized)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99456
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 50327
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50327=edit
gcc-10 output (unoptimized)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99456
Bug ID: 99456
Summary: [11 regression] ABI breakage with some static
initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99452
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Here's another:
using value_t = unsigned long;
unsigned obj;
constinit value_t failed
= reinterpret_cast () + (11 << 0);
constinit value_t accepted
= reinterpret_cast () + (11);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99452
Bug ID: 99452
Summary: Inconsistent constinit handling
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99451
Bug ID: 99451
Summary: [plugin] cannot enable dumps for plugin passes
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99285
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
//bug_a.ii
template struct common_type;
template<> struct common_type<> {};
template struct common_type<_Tp0> {};
template struct common_type<_Tp1, _Tp2> {};
//bug_b.ii
import "bug_a.ii";
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99245, which changed state.
Bug 99245 Summary: [modules] ICE in write_cluster, at cp/module.cc:14600
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99245
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99245
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99377
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99245
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99247, which changed state.
Bug 99247 Summary: [modules] ICE in write_macro_maps, at cp/module.cc:16154
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99247
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98718
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell ---
*** Bug 99247 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99247
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99377
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
// bug_a.ii
template
struct Widget
{
Widget (int) { }
bool First() const { return true; }
bool Second () const { return true;}
};
inline void Frob (const Widget& w) noexcept
{
w.First ();
}
//
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99413
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Correct. We're only picking headers that are either (a) user-facing or (b)
included from more than one place.
Specifically we're partitioning the include graph into a set of multi-reached
sub-graphs.
And
1 - 100 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
