Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: olaf at robots dot ox.ac.uk
The minimalistic example further down produces a very unexpected result and no
warnings at all. I understand that size_t s1 can not be negative. However, in
my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59961
--- Comment #3 from Olaf olaf at robots dot ox.ac.uk ---
Well... naive me found it quite surprising and unexpected that the following
two lines produce grossly different results:
double result1 = -s1*d1 + s2*d2;
double result2 = s2*d2 - s1*d1
