https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #6)
> Steve Lionel of Intel confirmed that the code is valid, and that if X is
> polymorphic, so is (X):
>
> community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/SELECT-TYPE-statemen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 56098
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56098&action=edit
Evidence for replies in last attachment
As promised in the previous entry in this PR.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
|--- |FIXED
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas ---
>From as far back as GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.2.1 20210728, the pointer function
assignment gives the correct result arr(-1) = -666.0
Marking it as fixed.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug 39627 depends on bug 52994, which changed state.
Bug 52994 Summary: [OOP] [F08] internal compiler error: in
gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6881
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 111674, which changed state.
Bug 111674 Summary: [13/14 regression] Failure to finalize an allocatable
subobject of a non-finalizable type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111674
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111674
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
|NEW
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-03
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 56036
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56036&action=edit
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 56035
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56035&action=edit
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80757
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276
Bug 19276 depends on bug 92586, which changed state.
Bug 92586 Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:13479 with nested
allocatable derived types
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276
Bug 19276 depends on bug 68155, which changed state.
Bug 68155 Summary: ICE on initializing character array in type (len_lhs <>
len_rhs)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111271
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
|1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #1)
> git blame says
>
> 6c95fe9bc0 (Pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #12)
> Fixed on mainline for gcc-14.
>
> Shall we close it? Or does it deserve backporting?
Hi Harald,
I was considering a backport of a composite finalization patch to bri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109684
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109684
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
>
> I am wondering about the pureness test itself, however. Surely, the test
> should be for impure procedures that are referenced and not just accessible?
>
> Paul
Cancel that comment - it's nonsense!
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109684
--- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #14)
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #12)
> > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 10:04:54PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109684
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #12)
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 10:04:54PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc b/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc
> > index 3cd470ddc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110720
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> Looks like a dup of pr109948, which is fixed on 14-trunk.
>
> @Paul: do you think your patch (commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4) is
> backportable to 13-branch?
I know that it i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99139
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #7)
> Updating known-to-work/known to fail version.
>
> Paul/Steve: do you want to assign this PR to one of you?
I am of two minds as to whether or not to backport the patch o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106050
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #6)
> (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
> > Possibly walking the symbols in reverse order to release them would fix
> > this.
> >
> It seems to work:
>
> diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106050
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 55515
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55515&action=edit
Patch that fixes this PR for me
I had to add to Steve's patch to get this PR sorted out.
Ideally of course, we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106050
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Likely started with r8-3056-g5bab4c9631c478b7, it was rejected before the
> revision anyway.
With all branches up to 13-branch, I see:
../pr105594/pr106050.f90:3:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> Null pointer dereference.
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
> index bd586e75008..8e2cd511c4d 100644
> --- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
> +++ b/gcc/fo
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|Internal compiler error:|[PDT] Internal compiler
|Parameterised derived types |error: Parameterised
||derived types
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Added to PDT meta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108663
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107142
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Added to PDT meta-bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107142
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105380
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||82173
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104650
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||82173
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --
||82173
Last reconfirmed||2023-06-30
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Added to PDT meta-bug
Referenced Bugs:
https
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Added to PDT meta-bug
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
[Bug 82173] [meta-bug] [PDT] Parameterized derived type errors
||2023-06-30
Blocks||82173
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Added to PDT meta-bug
Referenced Bugs:
https
|1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2023-06-30
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Added to PDT meta-bug
Referenced Bugs:
https
|1
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks||82173
Last reconfirmed||2023-06-30
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Added to PDT meta-bug
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103371
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||82173
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102901
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102686
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||82173
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102457
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||82173
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102241
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Added to PDT meta-bug
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
[Bug 82173] [meta-bug] [PDT] Parameterized derived type errors
||2023-06-30
Blocks||82173
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Added to PDT meta-bug
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99709
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98023
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Added to PDT meta-bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95543
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95541
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||82173
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Added to PDT meta-bug
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
[Bug 82173] [meta-bug] [PDT] Parameterized derived type errors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87908
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
*** Bug 99065 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 99065, which changed state.
Bug 99065 Summary: ASSOCIATE function selector expression "no IMPLICIT type"
failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99065
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99065
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #1)
> Here's a shorter reproducer:
>
> % cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108961
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88688
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Fixed on trunk and closing.
I will build a composite patch for 13-branch in a few weeks.
Thanks for the report
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 107900, which changed state.
Bug 107900 Summary: Select type with intrinsic type inside associate causes ICE
/ Segmenation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107900
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107900
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 110224, which changed state.
Bug 110224 Summary: Rejects valid: function reference with data pointer result
as lhs in assignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Neil,
> I actually didn't originally try that commented-out assignment with nagfor,
> but confirm that it gets it wrong as you said. I'll give you the honor of
> submitting a bug report.
Will do!
>
> na
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Neil Carlson from comment #5)
> >> !x%var_ptr() = 2.0 ! THIS IS NOT REJECTED AS EXPECTED
> >
> > I could have phrased the comment better. I expected that assignment to be
> > okay
> > (i.e., no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108961
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 55368
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55368&action=edit
Fix for this PR
I couldn't see what the problem was initially and so I put this PR to one side.
I still have it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Neil,
Thanks for posting this bug report.
> !x%var_ptr() = 2.0 ! THIS IS NOT REJECTED AS EXPECTED
Why do you think that this should be rejected? As I understood it, this was
permitted by the definition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87477
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
nagfor has the same behavior as ifort.
I believe that the following, which appears in F2018:19.5.1.6 applies:
"If a selector has the POINTER attribute, it shall be associated; the associate
name is associated with the t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107900
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107821
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 107821, which changed state.
Bug 107821 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at
fortran/trans-array.cc:3723
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107821
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109451
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 109451, which changed state.
Bug 109451 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor with ASSOCIATE and
substrings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109451
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99350
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
program p
character((0.)/0), target :: c = 'abc'
print *, c
end
Is a sufficient reproducer and so this is not an associate bug.
I am removing it from the blocks PR87477 list but will keep at it. For whatever
r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 109948, which changed state.
Bug 109948 Summary: [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank()
from gfc_op_rank_conformable()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948
--- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #16)
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15)
> > Created attachment 55225 [details]
> > Fix for this PR
> >
> > The attached patch substantially tidies up parse_associat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 106048, which changed state.
Bug 106048 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in ubsan_encode_value, at
ubsan.cc:143 / verify_gimple failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048
What|Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 104430, which changed state.
Bug 104430 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at
fortran/trans-expr.cc:2742 since r9-3522-gd0477233215e37de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104430
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104430
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 102532, which changed state.
Bug 102532 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_corank, at
fortran/expr.c:5769
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102532
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102532
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 102190, which changed state.
Bug 102190 Summary: Syntax error reported in associate construct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 102112, which changed state.
Bug 102112 Summary: Cannot associate with component of associate target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Brad,
This is fixed on trunk (14-branch). I am going to close the PR for housekeeping
purposes but will be sure to include the patch in a cumulative backport.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 102109, which changed state.
Bug 102109 Summary: Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect
type inferred
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 99326, which changed state.
Bug 99326 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in
gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
201 - 300 of 2241 matches
Mail list logo
