[Bug fortran/58906] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with CLASS IS generates ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58906 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/77385] "Unclassifiable statement" from gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77385 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/82077] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE on associating polymorphic array dummy with a type-guarded array section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82077 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/58618] Wrong code with character substring and ASSOCIATE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/56386] [F03] ICE with ASSOCIATE construct and an derived type array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/83146] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE on SELECT CASE statement with associate name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83146 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83146] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE on SELECT CASE statement with associate name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83146 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Oct 14 09:25:13 2018 New Revision: 265148 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265148=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-14 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83146 *

[Bug fortran/87566] ICE with class(*) and select

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87566 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 44835 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44835=edit Fix for the PR Hi Tobias, The problem that you found occurs in trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_class_to_class). Once found, the

[Bug fortran/83522] ICE on invalid allocatable string reference, string(:)(:)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83522 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- > Thus the patch is contrary to the standard and must be removed as soon > as possible. > > Paul By the way, the original problem is fixed on trunk by one of my recent deferred length character patches.

[Bug fortran/83522] ICE on invalid allocatable string reference, string(:)(:)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83522 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug fortran/86576] [F03][OOP] Sourced allocation of object array fails with SEGFAULT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86576 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > AFAICT the test in comment 2 has been fixed between revisions r264451 > (2018-09-20) and r264486 (2018-09-21), may be r264485 (pr87359). Unfortunately, the

[Bug fortran/55735] ICE with deferred-length strings in COMMON

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #7) > Ah sorry, I think I moved around the block data and then it wasn't valid > Fortran anymore. I think, both the block data and the subroutine are > external to the

[Bug fortran/55735] ICE with deferred-length strings in COMMON

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #7) > Ah sorry, I think I moved around the block data and then it wasn't valid > Fortran anymore. I think, both the block data and the subroutine are > external to the

[Bug fortran/80931] ICE on move_alloc in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:11335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80931 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Oct 9 07:46:48 2018 New Revision: 264949 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264949=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-09 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87151 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/87151] allocating array of character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87151 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Oct 9 07:46:48 2018 New Revision: 264949 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264949=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-09 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87151 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/83999] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83999 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83999] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83999 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 8 14:20:40 2018 New Revision: 264931 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264931=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-08 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83999 Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/86372] [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 86372, which changed state. Bug 86372 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 86372, which changed state. Bug 86372 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/86372] [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 8 13:02:36 2018 New Revision: 264925 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264925=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-08 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/86372

[Bug fortran/86372] [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 8 11:17:10 2018 New Revision: 264919 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264919=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-08 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86372 * trans-stmt.c

[Bug fortran/87151] allocating array of character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87151 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #3) > This now works with the actual trunk (r264898), and gives the anticipated > result > 2 3. So either it was fixed by one of Paul's other fixes, or he just didn't >

[Bug fortran/86372] [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86372] [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #10) > I think inside the logical function (in the local scope) the length of s has > to be printed as the value of the argument x, so 1 and 2, with or without > the

[Bug fortran/83999] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83999 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Oct 6 15:14:29 2018 New Revision: 264899 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264899=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-06 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83999 * resolve.c

[Bug fortran/83999] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83999 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/87487] New test case gfortran.dg/deferred_character_24.f90 in r264721 fails on big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87487 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/87487] New test case gfortran.dg/deferred_character_24.f90 in r264721 fails on big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87487 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Oct 5 07:01:57 2018 New Revision: 264862 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264862=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-05 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87487 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/56789] Handling of contiguous dummy arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/87487] New test case gfortran.dg/deferred_character_24.f90 in r264721 fails on big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87487 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/56789] Wrong code with contiguous dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #11) > (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #10) > > Even if that were allowed, the standard explicitly disallows the > > argument association in the

[Bug fortran/56789] Wrong code with contiguous dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #8) > Paul, I'm adding you to the CC in the hope that the analysis > in comment#7 might help you towards a solution that is > glaringly obvious to you (but not to me :-)

[Bug fortran/65677] Incomplete assignment on deferred-length character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 1 14:27:17 2018 New Revision: 264759 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264759=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-01 Paul Thomas PR fortran/65677 * trans-expr.c

[Bug c++/65667] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65667 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/38936] [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 38936, which changed state. Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20585] [meta-bug] Fortran 2003 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585 Bug 20585 depends on bug 38936, which changed state. Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/44044] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with class-valued function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44044 Bug 44044 depends on bug 38936, which changed state. Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/41599] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with associate-name => exp: Use (sometimes) a restricted pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41599 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #45 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 30 13:52:55 2018 New Revision: 264725 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264725=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87359 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/70752] Incorrect LEN for ALLOCATABLE CHARACTER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70752 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 30 12:22:07 2018 New Revision: 264724 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264724=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70752 PR fortran/72709

[Bug fortran/72709] Incorrect assignment of allocatable character array used as component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 30 12:22:07 2018 New Revision: 264724 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264724=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70752 PR fortran/72709

[Bug fortran/70149] [F08] Character pointer initialization causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 30 07:02:49 2018 New Revision: 264721 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264721=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70149 * trans-decl.c

[Bug c++/65667] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65667 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Sep 29 17:17:09 2018 New Revision: 264715 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264715=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-29 Paul Thomas PR fortran/65667 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #0) > The following code shows allocatable character does not work as it should: > >call g(1) > contains > subroutine g(x) > integer :: x >

[Bug fortran/70752] Incorrect LEN for ALLOCATABLE CHARACTER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70752 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/70149] [F08] Character pointer initialization causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/70149] [F08] Character pointer initialization causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #42 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 44746 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44746=edit Patch for the PR Many thanks Juergen for the reduced test. This is now DEJA-GNUified (see below). The patch regtests

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #41 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #40) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #39) > > The culprit for the second problem is r264358, exposed only once the > > original problem is fixed, i.e.

[Bug fortran/72709] Incorrect assignment of allocatable character array used as component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 67883, which changed state. Bug 67883 Summary: ICE on empty array constructor of character function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/67883] ICE on empty array constructor of character function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67883] ICE on empty array constructor of character function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #2) > Another group of examples. > First case is working in a sufficient manner. > Concatenating two empty hulls (zero len and size, respectivly) > gives an empty

[Bug fortran/67883] ICE on empty array constructor of character function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #0) > With an effectively empty (i=m,n and m>n) array constructor : > > > $ cat z1.f90 > program p >integer i >print *, [(f(i), i=2,1)] > contains >

[Bug fortran/65677] Incomplete assignment on deferred-length character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 44738 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44738=edit A fix for the PR I have no idea at all why I didn't manage to fix this previously. It is almost obvious. Paul

[Bug fortran/65677] Incomplete assignment on deferred-length character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/85603] ICE with character array substring assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85603 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Sep 22 10:21:25 2018 New Revision: 264502 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264502=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-22 Paul Thomas PR fortran/85603 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/85603] ICE with character array substring assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85603 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87151] allocating array of character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87151 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/77325] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77325 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #23 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #21) > In our functional test suite, the tests nlo_4, nlo_5, fks_res_1 and another > test are still failing, they lead to segmentation faults. This will be > really

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #20) > Paul, thanks for the fix, our code test suite is still running, most of the > problems are solved, the unit test suite is completely good now, but there > are

[Bug fortran/77325] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77325 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Sep 21 17:33:29 2018 New Revision: 264486 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264486=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-21 Paul Thomas PR fortran/77325 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #18 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Juergen, Thanks for doing the reduction of the problem and thanks to Dominique for testing the patch. Fixed. Paul

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Sep 21 17:26:23 2018 New Revision: 264485 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264485=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-21 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87359 * trans-stmt.c

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87270] "FINAL" subroutine is called when compiled with "gfortran -O1", but not "gfortran -O0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87270 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to janus from comment #2) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > > This seems to have been fixed by revision r264008 on trunk > > Seems the segfault is 'fixed' due to the fact that

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #7) > Well, I can confirm this. Output from valgrind shows as the first error: > > Running test: event_transforms_1| Process library 'event_transforms_1_lib': >

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #5) > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > > After generating a lot of module files with -fsyntax-only > > so make succeeds, and then running "make check" on

[Bug fortran/84109] ICE in adjustl on allocatable array of strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84109 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Sep 19 17:44:36 2018 New Revision: 264427 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264427=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84109 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/84109] ICE in adjustl on allocatable array of strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84109 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87239] ICE in deferred-length string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > > Duplicate of/ related to pr77325 and pr84109. > > PR84109 is completely different. The array descriptor

[Bug fortran/87239] ICE in deferred-length string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 18 19:35:53 2018 New Revision: 264409 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264409=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87239 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87336] [8/9 regression] wrong output for pointer dummy assiocated to target actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87336 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 18 17:58:20 2018 New Revision: 264405 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264405=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87336 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 18 17:54:20 2018 New Revision: 264404 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264404=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/85954 * resolve.c

[Bug fortran/87336] [8/9 regression] wrong output for pointer dummy assiocated to target actual argument

||2018-09-18 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa - I

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk. It only took 4 years :-( What are you up to these days, FX? Paul

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Sep 17 11:22:27 2018 New Revision: 264365 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264365=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-17 Paul Thomas PR fortran/64120 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/87239] ICE in deferred-length string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Sep 17 07:18:17 2018 New Revision: 264358 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264358=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-17 Paul Thomas PR fortran/85954 * resolve.c

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 44701 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44701=edit A fix for the PR This regtests OK. It needs one or two further tweaks before submission, which will occur tomorrow.

[Bug fortran/87284] [7/8/9 Regression] Allocation of class arrays with mold results in "conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87284 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87284] [7/8/9 Regression] Allocation of class arrays with mold results in "conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87284 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Sep 13 19:46:05 2018 New Revision: 264288 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264288=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87284 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/87284] [7/8/9 Regression] Allocation of class arrays with mold results in "conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87284 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Sep 12 18:53:50 2018 New Revision: 264251 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264251=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87284 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/87284] [7/8/9 Regression] Allocation of class arrays with mold results in "conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87284 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Sep 12 18:33:13 2018 New Revision: 264249 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264249=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87284 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/87284] New: [7/8/9 Regression] Allocation of class arrays with mold results in "conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value"

oduct: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Reported by Andrew Baldwin on clf:

[Bug fortran/87277] [8/9 regression] Segfault on using array component of class scalar pointer as an actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87277 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87277] [8/9 regression] Segfault on using array component of class scalar pointer as an actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87277 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 11 17:18:13 2018 New Revision: 264213 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264213=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87277 * expr.c

[Bug fortran/87277] [8/9 regression] Segfault on using array component of class scalar pointer as an actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87277 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 11 15:59:07 2018 New Revision: 264210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264210=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87277 * expr.c

[Bug fortran/87277] New: [8/9 regression] Segfault on using array component of class scalar pointer as an actual argument

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Reported by Andrew Baldwin on clf. This segfaults in 8- and 9-branches. MODULE INTS_TYPE_MODULE

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86760] [8/9 Regression] FORTRAN: polymorphic arrays inside a user-defined type generate segmentation faults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86760 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >