--- Comment #5 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2008-01-27 07:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Bogus error with USEing
modules
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-27 00:14
---
If the ONLY's i test.f90
--- Comment #16 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2008-01-06 20:39 ---
Subject: Re: ICE when compiling Fortran 95 code
Tobias,
Nothing - I have just updated to FC8 and blew all my nice set-up to
pieces. This is the first time that Fedora has let me down. I will be
operational
--- Comment #12 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-10-27 15:47 ---
Subject: Re: Incorrect host association in module
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-27 13:31
---
To recap (correct me, if I'm wrong
--- Comment #7 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-04-26 23:04 ---
Subject: Re: rhs array is changed while assiging to same
lhs array
Thomas,
It's some trivial failure of the logic in gfc_dep_resolver. I took a
quick look but did not see it because I am totally exhausted
--- Comment #2 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-04-11 21:05 ---
Subject: Re: result_in_spec_1.f90: Invalid write
Tobias,
however, test(1) returns an array of the size (2*1+1)+1 = 4.
Thanks for spotting that one. I'm just in the process of committing the
fix as 'obvious
--- Comment #9 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-03-08 18:12 ---
Subject: Re: allocatable component and intent(out) yield
ICE in fold_convert
Daniel,
--- Comment #8 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-08 16:36
---
Paul, could you have a look at PR31086? I
--- Comment #2 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-02-21 05:16 ---
Subject: Re: %VAL only accepts default-kind integer/real/complex
Tobias,
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 17:32
---
Paul, do you remember why you have added the following
--- Comment #6 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-02-14 20:54 ---
Subject: Re: incomplete file triggers ICE
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-14 20:31
---
The patch is straight forward. Need to check
--- Comment #58 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-02-12 22:55 ---
Subject: Re: [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk wrote:
--- Comment #57 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-02-12 19:18 ---
Yes, that's the one: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran
--- Comment #6 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-02-05 09:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 and 4.1 only] Allocatable components
of a derived type require the SAVE attribute.
toon,
1
Error: Object 'g_dest' at (1) must have the SAVE attribute for default
--- Comment #5 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-02-02 19:20 ---
Subject: Re: Array pointers to components of derived type
arrays do not work
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 11:28
---
As I came
--- Comment #21 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-01-11 19:28 ---
Subject: Re: testsuite failures in actual_array_constructor_2.f90
and actual_array_substr_2.f90
Kaveh,
Paul - I understand that you may not have time to actually fix the bug.
However something seems to have
--- Comment #14 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-01-10 22:09 ---
Subject: Re: testsuite failures in actual_array_constructor_2.f90
and actual_array_substr_2.f90
Kaveh
--- Comment #13 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 21:45
---
Paul - The bug
--- Comment #18 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-12-07 17:33 ---
Subject: Re: Problem with handling optional and entry
master arguments
elizabeth,
We are talking about the same machine and the same operating system. All the
x86_64 binaries are from http
--- Comment #10 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-12-07 23:34 ---
Subject: Re: Ambigous interfaces not detected
burnus,
I'm quite sure I wouldn't have understood the Although not referenced
correctly without the deep look at the standard.
And if it is indeed referenced
--- Comment #7 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-12-06 23:08 ---
Subject: Re: Ambigous interfaces not detected
Tobias,
c) Gfortran is a bit inconsequent with regards to , only:
use mod1
use mod2,only: foo
compiles without an error/warning whereas for
use mod1,only
--- Comment #8 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-12-04 18:38 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 and 4.2 only] Dimension of a function
result as host association does not work
Tobias,
t you saw the submission email (autoattached to this PR and thus also
in your mailbox).
As I said
--- Comment #18 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-12-03 17:42 ---
Subject: Re: [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
Tobias,
The patch looks good -- and the test cases as well.
Great!
Just for completeness, the relevant part of the standard is:
C1209 (R1206) A procedure-name shall
--- Comment #19 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-12-03 19:41 ---
Subject: Re: [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
Tobias,
Note that this does not fix everything as gfortran rejects also
interface_y.f90
if I comment the call bl_copy(1.0, chr); if I understand the standard
correctly
--- Comment #16 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-12-02 17:56 ---
Subject: Re: Problem with handling optional and entry
master arguments
elizabeth dot l dot yip at boeing dot com wrote:
It worked using gfortran on my OS X system.
~/src/C_C++ $ gfortran -v
Using built
--- Comment #5 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-11-28 05:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE on optional arg
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-28 01:18
---
I think wrong url in comment #3
--- Comment #2 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-11-27 06:19 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE on optional arg
Andrew,
We are calling build_int_cst on a real type.
Yes, I discovered the same on my flight back to France last night. Will
come up with a fix tonight
--- Comment #11 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-10-12 15:57 ---
Subject: Re: LBOUND(TRANSPOSE(I)) doesn't work
FX
! if (upper)
! {
! cond1 = fold_build2 (GE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, ubound, lbound);
! cond2 = fold_build2 (LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node
--- Comment #5 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-10-11 06:11 ---
Subject: Re: LBOUND(TRANSPOSE(I)) doesn't work
FX,
That's because of F95 13.14.53:
Case (i): For an array section or for an array expression other than a whole
array or array structure component, LBOUND(ARRAY
--- Comment #8 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-10-11 08:02 ---
Subject: Re: LBOUND(TRANSPOSE(I)) doesn't work
FX,
I get all intrinsics that work through temporaries working right:
Great!
So I only have PRODUCT, SUM, MATMUL, PACK and UNPACK to work on.
I wonder
--- Comment #8 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-10-11 17:05 ---
Subject: Re: implicit type declaration and contained function
clash
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #6 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-11 16:07 ---
You're working too fast, Paul
--- Comment #3 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-10-09 20:11 ---
Subject: Re: implicit type declaration and contained function
clash
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
(BTW I added you to the CC list, it is kinda hard to answer in the right place
otherwise)
Oh s**t - next
--- Comment #8 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-10-05 16:17 ---
Subject: Re: ICE using intrinsics as arguments
FX
That bug is fixed by my submitted patch about INTRINSICS
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-10/msg00022.html).
I'll review it tomorrow - I am going to give
--- Comment #2 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-10-04 16:33 ---
Subject: Re: (Regression) Error on valid specification
variables in same call to ALLOCATE
Steve,
I just wrote to Martin apologising and thanking him - the patch is
regtesting right now and I am all geared up
--- Comment #5 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-10-01 19:59 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE for optional subroutine
argument
Dear All,
PS: Just curious..
Why isn't this part of gfc_conv_function_call() coded to check for fsym once
and only then have the additional
--- Comment #12 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-09-19 11:56 ---
Subject: Re: Memory leak in gfortran
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 22:35 ---
Not fixed just yet.
Steven, I put it to rights
--- Comment #31 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-09-04 17:48 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails
for Fortran operator
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #30 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-04 17:39 ---
Gcc 4.2.0 revision 116560 plus
--- Comment #33 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-09-04 20:33 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails
for Fortran operator
Jack,
I know *sigh* First I have to fix that which was working that I
broke. Then I will fix that which was neither broken nor
--- Comment #27 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-09-01 17:24 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails
for Fortran operator
HJ,
I might be slow but I get there... what has been plaguing me all week is
doing the development under Cygwin. I just realised
--- Comment #13 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-31 17:41 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails
for Fortran operator
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #12 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-31 16:57 ---
It also fails with gcc 4.1 revision
--- Comment #16 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-31 18:20 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails
for Fortran operator
HJ
Yes, I think that function interfaces in general are of the same
horrible kind.
Thanks
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #18 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-31 18:41 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails
for Fortran operator
hjl,
--- Comment #17 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-31 18:28 ---
The previous gfc_get_derived_type tries to reuse the same
--- Comment #21 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-09-01 04:58 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails
for Fortran operator
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
Thanks HJ. It seems that I am going to have to revert this one; I have
spent way too much time
--- Comment #7 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-30 20:01 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails for
Fortran operator
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-30 19:40 ---
Before the change, gfc_get_derived_type
--- Comment #10 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-30 21:03 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails for
Fortran operator
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #9 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-30 20:38 ---
The patch doesn't work for me:
Starting
--- Comment #11 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-30 21:56 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression]: fold_convert fails for
Fortran operator
HJ,
I have cross-checked the patch between the two machines; it is the
same. One regtests fine and the other segfaults in switch_types. I
--- Comment #12 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-26 09:30 ---
Subject: Re: [gfortran: 4.1, 4.2 regression] ICE on valid
code
Jerry and Martin,
All of this is very depressing - I can reproduce the 32 bit version of
the problem and, I suppose, will reproduce the 64 bit
--- Comment #8 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-25 13:25 ---
Subject: Re: [gfortran: 4.1, 4.2 regression] ICE on valid
code
martin,
--- Comment #7 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-08-25
12:57 ---
Hi Paul,
sorry for the late reply, I was away
--- Comment #9 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-24 21:40 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 only] gfortran: matmul produces wrong
result
Tobias,
Seeing as it is you, I just put a first version on to cook; I simply
copied everything below the line
if (GFC_DESCRIPTOR_RANK (retarray
--- Comment #22 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-21 13:31 ---
Subject: Re: spurious warnings with -W -Wunused
martin,
Should I open a new PR for this?
I have a half memory that there is already a PR for this. Could you
check first before submitting a new one
--- Comment #24 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-21 20:13 ---
Subject: Re: spurious warnings with -W -Wunused
martin,
--- Comment #23 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-08-21
16:59 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
I have a half memory
--- Comment #16 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-16 21:58 ---
Subject: Re: spurious warnings with -W -Wunused
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-16 13:04 ---
It looks good to me.
Thanks, Jakub; I
--- Comment #4 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-02 12:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression]: Optional argument failed
I'll take a look at this as soon as I get home (friday). There is a PR out on
PRESENT that I noticed before leaving. I'll try to gather together
--- Comment #1 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-06-20 19:08 ---
Subject: Re: New: Modulo of real(kind=10) variables doesn't
work
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
While working on PR 24518, I found the following:
$ cat a.f90
real(kind=10) :: x = 10.0
print *, mod
--- Comment #9 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-06-16 16:18 ---
Subject: Re: rejects valid array initialization expression
Harald,
You might wish to extend this to m(5) = ..., because:
integer, parameter :: p(8) = (/(m(i:i+1), i = 1,4)/)
the last accessed
--- Comment #8 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-05-18 20:03 ---
Subject: Re: crashes in sra_walk_expr and emit_move_insn
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #7 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 16:36 ---
Paul, you didn't ask yourself to the CC
--- Comment #18 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-05-14 13:43 ---
Subject: Re: Transfer of character to integer array and
vice versa still doesn't work
bo,
Ah, thank goodness for that. I thought that I was going out of my mind!
For you purposes, rather than svn, have you
--- Comment #5 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-05-13 07:23 ---
Subject: Re: Transfer of character to integer array and
vice versa still doesn't work
Bo,
You're very welcome, but actually thanks in Swedish spells tack.
I had guessed you to be Norwegian
Due
--- Comment #7 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-05-13 09:31 ---
Subject: Re: Transfer of character to integer array and
vice versa still doesn't work
Bo (and Andrew),
I think that I have lost such few marbles as I ever had! Having
converted to using the cl-backen_decl
--- Comment #12 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-05-13 19:09 ---
Subject: Re: Transfer of character to integer array and
vice versa still doesn't work
bo,
Should I download the latest source code snapshot and apply the patch on
that ?
No, that will not help
--- Comment #15 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-05-13 20:00 ---
Subject: Re: Transfer of character to integer array and
vice versa still doesn't work
bo,
Paul,
I have only tried gfortran on 32 bit cpus. I downloaded the latest
subversion snapshot, applied the patch
--- Comment #24 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-05-06 08:02 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran ICE: Not Implemented: Scalarization
of non-elemental intrinsic: __transfer1
I'm unfamiliar with Bugzilla, so if I annoy anyone, apologies.
You made a serious comment... you won't upset
--- Comment #9 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-04-04 04:39 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Scalar TRANSFER
- error: invalid operand to unary operator
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-03 21:13
--- Comment #2 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-04-04 04:42 ---
Subject: Re: accepts invalid fortran, different dummy
types/number
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-04 01:37
---
Here is another testcase
--- Comment #5 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-04-03 00:56 ---
Subject: Re: Scalar TRANSFER - error: invalid
operand to unary operator
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-02 22:43
---
A work around
--- Comment #2 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-03-28 09:46 ---
Subject: Re: Automatic conversion for optional parameters
of missing dummies
toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl wrote:
--- Comment #1 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2006-03-28
08:15
--- Comment #2 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-03-28 04:08 ---
Subject: Re: SIZE parameter interacts with same variable
in IO list character length specification.
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 01
--- Comment #2 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-03-23 16:53 ---
Subject: Re: New: Scalarization of non-elemental intrinsic:
__logical_4_l4
Carsten,
Would you be so kind as to send me bessj.f90, please? My Numerical
Recipes is the F77 version!
I am not sure that I know how
--- Comment #4 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-02-19 19:25 ---
Subject: Re: Dependency checking fails for equivalences
tobi,
--- Comment #3 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-19 18:56 ---
I might be a little late, given that you already posted a patch which
--- Comment #10 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-01-18 16:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] gfortran - incorrectly
issues an error on tests for optional arguments with assumed length
Dale,
I am sorry that I upset you. It was completely unintentional.
I upset
--- Comment #3 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-01-10 05:16 ---
Subject: Re: Components of a derived type array not passed
as an array
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 23:24
---
the parse tree
--- Comment #9 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-01-08 09:49 ---
Subject: Re: named common block confused as procedure
- runtime segfault
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 06:13
---
(In reply
--- Comment #6 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-01-07 21:44 ---
Subject: Re: named common block confused as procedure
- runtime segfault
Steve and Andrew,
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-07 20:19 ---
Andrew, Lahey's code checking utility
--- Comment #7 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-01-07 21:46 ---
Subject: Re: named common block confused as procedure
- runtime segfault
The enclosed patch catches Andrew's PR but also snags on
g77/19990905-1.f (The Burley test case).
In fact, it regtests OK, apart from
--- Comment #6 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-11-08 18:56 ---
Subject: Re: ICE on module name vs dummy argument name
tobi,
--- Comment #4 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 13:07 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Thank you Salvatore and Andrew.
The proposed
--- Comment #6 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-11-05 10:51 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types
with private components
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 19:22 ---
CCing pault, as he
--- Comment #6 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-10-21 04:19 ---
Subject: Re: ice in assignment of derived type constructor
Paul, do you want to add this as a testcase?
I was in two minds about it. Checking that a structure exists before
dereferencing it is not going
--- Comment #3 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-10-19 02:54 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] gfortran failed to build
187.facerec
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-19 00:48 ---
It is caused by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
--- Comment #4 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-10-14 16:38 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in trans-types.c for nested derived types
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 13:09
---
Fixed.
Andrew,
You keep
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-10-01
16:59 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in f951 with nested, recursive derived
types
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01
15:38 ---
Confirmed
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-09-09
08:21 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 only] erronous error message on vaild
USE statement
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-09
07:55
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-08-22
18:18 ---
Subject: Re: ICE on correct code
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
17:40 ---
Confirmed.
Back trace:
#0
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-08-03
07:06 ---
Mike,
As I promised on the fortran list, I am about to tackle module equivalences.
Since there are clearly associated issues with equivalences in general, I need
to come to grips with those too.
Your
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-08-03
07:54 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00307.html
This is still not complete. The example below produces separate unions, which
represent the equivalences
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-08-03
10:01 ---
Tobi,
We should agree the condition by which the call to gfc_trans_arrayfunc_assign
is bypassed and get this one out of the way. The original, posted to the list,
had:
expr1-symtree-n.sym-ts.type
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-08-03
11:42 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
The bug is caused by the call to gfc_set_default_type in resolve.c:3961
passing
0 as second argument, thereby suppressing the error that should be issued
there.
Unfortunately
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-08-03
11:51 ---
Two separate USE statements works correctly, as the example below can
demonstrate. This has got to be solvable
Paul T
module a
integer, parameter :: b = kind(1.e0)
end module a
program d
use
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-08-03
12:05 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I was sure this was a duplicate but I couldn't find it.
It's effectively 15382, is it not?
Paul T
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20890
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-08-03
12:31 ---
Sorry if I appear dense, but where is the problem in changing
namelist /cor/ a
print cor
to
namelist /cor/ a
write (*,cor)
?
Or even horrible, horrible, horrible
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-08-02
07:54 ---
I do apologise for missing this one: My fix for PR16940 fixes this fellow too.
I would be grateful if the reporters can give the latest cvs a whirl to confirm
that this is the case.
This expanded
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-08-02
15:44 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran X edit descriptor failure: test
f77-edit-x-out.f
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02
10:52
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-27
16:21 ---
interfaces. This brings me to a question: what is a named interface? I
This is a nameless interface, isn't it?
module snafu
interface
subroutine really_snafu (foo)
integer, intent
--
Bug 17379 depends on bug 16940, which changed state.
Bug 16940 Summary: Failure to perform host association correctly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16940
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-22
19:19 ---
fixed on mainline and 4.02
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22570
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-20
16:35 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Confirmed, I think this was caused by:
2005-07-12 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It sure as heck looks like me.
I'm on to it!
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-20
19:07 ---
Subject: Re: Null Characters instead of blanks in text
output.
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
15:41 ---
Confirmed
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-20
22:02 ---
Subject: Re: Null Characters instead of blanks in text
output.
Steve,
There are two problems:
The output looks good though:
19 1 4 9162536496481 100 121 144
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-21
05:33 ---
Subject: Re: Null Characters instead of blanks in text
output.
Steven,
The output looks good though:
19 1 4 9162536496481 100
121 144 169 196 225
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-20
04:23 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran X edit descriptor failure: test
f77-edit-x-out.f
Please send me the test cases and preferably, post them on Bugzilla.
Paul T
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-20
04:29 ---
I can help you with a test case if you need it.
Yup, can't do a durned thing unless you show me where it hurts. I checked every
aspect of the standard that I could.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-13
17:43 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Patch here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00937.html
What about the testcase, David?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-12
07:16 ---
Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope
Paul, do you have any idea what find_special could be intended for? It seems
obvious that it does the wrong thing in the case of this PR, and I can't see
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-11
20:02 ---
Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope
That seems to be as good as one could want!
Paul T
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20363
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-12
05:44 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Fixed in 4.0.2 and above.
Strictly speaking, pr15966 is fixed. However, writing to array internal files
is still broken because no record length (aka character length) is being
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-10
16:57 ---
Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-10 15:37
---
Erik has posted a patch
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
