--- Comment #8 from philipp at marek dot priv dot at 2006-05-16 08:20
---
If I remove the -funroll-loops, will it cause better code generation? I.e.
only save two registers at function start, and use just these two registers?
Can I achieve such an optimization without doing assembly
--- Comment #6 from philipp at marek dot priv dot at 2006-05-15 05:17
---
CFLAGS:=-g -mmcu=$(MCU) -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -mcall-prologues
-I/usr/avr/include -I/home/flip/cprogs/AVR/include -funroll-loops -save-temps
%.s: %.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -Os -S $
The .i results from
ReportedBy: philipp at marek dot priv dot at
GCC build triplet: i486-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i486-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27593
--- Comment #1 from philipp at marek dot priv dot at 2006-05-13 20:09
---
Created an attachment (id=11452)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11452action=view)
The C file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27593
--- Comment #2 from philipp at marek dot priv dot at 2006-05-13 20:09
---
Created an attachment (id=11453)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11453action=view)
The Makefile
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27593
--- Comment #3 from philipp at marek dot priv dot at 2006-05-13 20:10
---
Created an attachment (id=11454)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11454action=view)
The preprocessor output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27593
--- Comment #4 from philipp at marek dot priv dot at 2006-05-13 20:11
---
Created an attachment (id=11455)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11455action=view)
The output (dump) file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27593
