https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65912
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com ---
On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:10 PM, jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
Has anyone run into this issue on other architecture like MIPS, PPC?
Yes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com ---
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:44 PM, terry.guo at arm dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648
Bug ID: 65648
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60533
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com ---
On Mar 15, 2014, at 7:59 PM, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60533
--- Comment #7 from Bill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58772
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com ---
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 21, 2013, at 2:35 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58772
Tobias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58454
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com ---
All of these functions overflow the loop induction variable so only -fwrapv
will provide the behavior you want for all of the functions. The inconsistent
behavior is due
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58279
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com ---
I have a fix which I hope to share in the next few weeks.
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 30, 2013, at 3:31 AM, evstupac at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54304
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2012-08-17 19:13:50 UTC ---
This is a darwin only issue.
On Aug 17, 2012 12:07 PM, tobi at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #36 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2012-04-02 17:35:59 UTC ---
I know some of us use tee and that disables termainal detection code usually.
Or output to a file and then use tail -f. So please don't do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52705
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2012-03-25 05:12:44 UTC ---
You are volating c/c++ aliasing rules. Use memcpy or -fno-strict-aliasing .
Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T
On Mar 24, 2012 21:27, veiokej
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-11-13 04:32:06 UTC ---
According to another email mips is broken the same way.
Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T
On Nov 12, 2011 20:18, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
lt;gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-08-16 17:25:26 UTC ---
Because darwin's as does not support it. It only supports with r0.
Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T
On Aug 16, 2011 10:13, ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49807
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-07-21 20:39:08 UTC ---
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:34 PM, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
I don't know the exact rationale why volatile_ok is false
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49709
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-07-12 00:58:13 UTC ---
Hmmm. There was just a recent patch to the tail call area which was supposed to
fix a testcase like this.
Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T
On Jul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47708
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-02-12 06:36:09 UTC ---
You are violating c/c++ aliasing rules. nbsp;The code is undefined.
Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T
On Feb 11, 2011 22:27, zephyrtronium
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-01-21 11:43:45 UTC ---
Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T
On Jan 20, 2011 21:34, hjl.tools at gmail dot com
lt;gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.orggt; wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-01-05 02:56:51 UTC ---
I think one is the old abi and the other is the new one.
Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T
On Jan 4, 2011 18:33, doko at ubuntu dot com lt;gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47108
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2010-12-29 13:18:40 UTC ---
enum { nbsp;a=1lt;lt;33 }blaf;nbsp;
That is still an int as 1 is of type int. Try 1lllt;lt;33.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2010-11-11 04:41:09 UTC ---
These failures have fixed already. The issue was in the testsuite.
On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:13 PM, hjl.tools at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2010-10-26 15:56:20 UTC ---
On Oct 26, 2010, at 7:30 AM, j...@jak-linux.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-09-03 19:02 ---
Subject: Re: New: Failure to bind auto variable to function template instance
I think there is a dup of this bug without auto. Not to mention it was
defect report against the standard.
On Sep 3, 2010, at 10:07 AM
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-09-02 19:55 ---
Subject: Re: New: Does adding configure-options for specs-hardcoding make
sense?
You could use a small wrapper script that adds R option instead of a
specs file or adds the specs file to the command line.
On Sep 2
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-09-01 06:17 ---
Subject: Re: Bad optimization in -O3 sometimes
I am not talking about a library solution at all. I am talking about a
solution inside the compiler. Gcc will optimize memcpy; how much for
MIPS is a good question. Try
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-09-02 05:55 ---
Subject: Re: r163660 ICEs gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c
compilation, -Os at -m32
On Sep 1, 2010, at 10:47 PM, ubizjak at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #10 from
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-08-31 19:09 ---
Subject: Re: Bad optimization in -O3 sometimes
On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:24 AM, yotambarnoy at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #4 from yotambarnoy at gmail dot com 2010-08-31
15:24
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-09-01 04:41 ---
Subject: Re: Bad optimization in -O3 sometimes
On Aug 31, 2010, at 9:32 PM, yotambarnoy at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #6 from yotambarnoy at gmail dot com 2010-09-01
04:32
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-08-25 12:43 ---
Subject: Re: __builtin_expect and -Os generates stupid code
On Aug 25, 2010, at 5:23 AM, socketpair at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #7 from socketpair at gmail dot com 2010-08
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-08-22 18:05 ---
Subject: Re: New: no such instruction: `pcmpestri $0,(%rdi),%xmm0'
What version of binutils is being used?
Have you tried a newer version?
On Aug 22, 2010, at 3:11 AM, mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-08-11 17:03 ---
Subject: Re: New: linkage on -lm and -lpthread should be purged from darwin
build
What about removing those in the driver? This way it works correctly
for other makefiles too?
On Aug 11, 2010, at 9:30 AM, howarth
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-08-10 12:36 ---
Subject: Re: New: optimizer dereference
On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:00 AM, attardi at di dot unipi dot it
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
Code produced using -O2 handles dereferencing incorrectly.
Here is a program
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-07-21 02:53 ---
Subject: Re: New: Invalid ambiguity on partial class specialization matching
On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:43 PM, rodolfo at rodsoft dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
The following code doesn't compile unless
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-07-15 09:19 ---
Subject: Re: Optimizer doesn't see setjmp()
On Jul 15, 2010, at 2:15 AM, cm1 at mumac dot de gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from cm1 at mumac dot de 2010-07-15 09:15 ---
Sorry, I
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-07-15 16:02 ---
Subject: Re: New: #include iostream.h imply global constructor.
This is expected and iirc required by the c++ standard too.
On Jul 15, 2010, at 8:51 AM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-07-09 14:48 ---
Subject: Re: New: Hitting gcc_assert in build2_stat with pr30388.c testsuite
test case
Can you give the full backtrace? Where is the build2 being called from?
On Jul 9, 2010, at 7:36 AM, bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-07-06 14:40 ---
Subject: Re: New: bug in STL iterator class
On Jul 6, 2010, at 7:21 AM, andre dot bergner dot 0 at googlemail dot
com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
This is not a compiler bug, but a bug in the STL iterator
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-07-06 16:33 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcc should not issue warnings for code that will never be
executed
This is a dup of a much older bug which I cannot find right now.
On Jul 6, 2010, at 8:10 AM, vincent at vinc17 dot org
gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-07-02 20:17 ---
Subject: Re: New: Code generated references undefined symbol
These functions are part of PowerPC abi. So they should be provided by
either libgcc or the libc.
On Jul 2, 2010, at 1:12 PM, joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-07-01 05:04 ---
Subject: Re: New: Complex division with NaN produces unexpected result
I think the issue is we don't implement imagainy types so 1 + nan I
turns into nan.
On Jun 30, 2010, at 9:51 PM, ian at airs dot com gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-06-29 16:40 ---
Subject: Re: New: Break in increment expression of for statement
inconsistent with g++
What does a break with a statement expression do for each frontend? Is
it even valid to have a break there(without a statement
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-06-25 14:18 ---
Subject: Re: New: missed GXX_EXPERIMENTAL guards in tr1/tuple?
On Jun 25, 2010, at 3:49 AM, pluto at agmk dot net gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
hi,
the latest llvm/clang++ reports an error during parsing tr1
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-06-22 16:34 ---
Subject: Re: New: the -i4 option is not supported anymore in 4.4
They were replaced with -fdefualt-integer-4/8.
On Jun 22, 2010, at 8:49 AM, doko at ubuntu dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
[forwarded from
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-06-17 09:37 ---
Subject: Re: switch/case optimization produces an invalid lookup table index
I bet it could be reproduced on any target with -fshort-enums.
On Jun 17, 2010, at 2:20 AM, eblot dot ml at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-06-16 17:04 ---
Subject: Re: New: you can't use a typedef from a typename scope in a template
On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:57 AM, gcc at razorcam dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
You can't use a typedef from a typename scope
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-06-13 21:58 ---
Subject: Re: New: wrong code due to branch optimization
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
When compiled with -03, the attached
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-06-08 05:11 ---
Subject: Re: __cxa_end_cleanup ends up in wrong section i.e. not in .text
Well this code will only be compiled for arm-eabi which is an elf only
target. Please submit your patch to gcc-patc...@.
Sent from my iPhone
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-06-03 13:48 ---
Subject: Re: New: Problem with command line arguments in windows
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2010, at 5:15 AM, alexandrfedorov at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
I'm trying to write windows
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-06-02 13:33 ---
Subject: Re: New: goto_locus lost at -O0 during cfg cleanup
I think this is a dup of a much older bug.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:30 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-05-29 13:30 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] arm linux kernel crahes when built with
-fipa-sra, __naked attribute is broken
The naked attribute should cause two things noinline and noclone.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 29, 2010, at 4
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-05-29 15:39 ---
Subject: Re: New: IRA/reload moves asm statement
I don't think this is valid. You cannot depend on where the spill will
happen around a function call. It is spilling to save the volatile
register. With -O, we don't
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-05-21 01:52 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.6 regression] Revision 159621 caused new x86 test
failures
This is the same problem as the other sse testcases.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 20, 2010, at 6:34 PM, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
gcc
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-05-18 03:50 ---
Subject: Re: New: Wrong code generated with -O2 and above
Sent from my iPhone
On May 17, 2010, at 8:37 PM, eyakubovich at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
This is a stripped down code from proposed
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-05-14 13:10 ---
Subject: Re: New: Unneeded +0.0 for c = 0.0 ; c = c+ a*b
Sent from my iPhone
On May 14, 2010, at 2:18 AM, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
This code leads to the adding of 0.0
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-29 02:23 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcc handle short overflow failed
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 28, 2010, at 6:58 PM, cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
#include string.h
#include stdio.h
int main(int
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-24 23:12 ---
Subject: Re: New: warning attached to a function is emitted even though the
function is not being called
It is called directly because safe_close's value is replaced in the
indirect call. Since safe_close is static
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-22 23:51 ---
Subject: Re: New: -Os creates larger binaries than before in some cases
(-falign-... options enabled)
Which target is this for?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 22, 2010, at 4:48 PM, rwahl at gmx dot de gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-20 16:38 ---
Subject: Re: Bootstrapping GCC 4.5.0 fails with cannot compute suffix of
object files: cannot compile
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 20, 2010, at 8:42 AM, florin at iucha dot net
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-19 15:07 ---
Subject: Re: Erroneous expansion of __asm__() directive
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 19, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Nelson H. F. Beebe
be...@math.utah.edu wrote:
That is wrong because with ATT style x86 asm, the src
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-19 19:11 ---
Subject: Re: GCC ICE on optimize attribute
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:02 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-14 17:56 ---
Subject: Re: New: -march unconditionally added to COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:56 AM, jue at jue dot li gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
As of 4.5.0 -march is always added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-08 17:06 ---
Subject: Re: Code segfault when compiled with -Os, -O2, or -O3
I don't think this is a bug in gcc. The inline-asm uses $16 but any of
the output/temp registers could use that as you don't say the agrument
is used
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-08 17:25 ---
Subject: Re: New: [gcc-plugin] c++ based plugins doesn't work.
Iirc this is on purpose. You need to build gcc with the c++ compiler
if you want c++ plugins.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 8, 2010, at 10:12 AM, pluto
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-06 03:01 ---
Subject: Re: New: -flto doesn't remember -fPIC
This is done on purpose. The -fpic is needed on the link line too.
This is a bug in libtool.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2010, at 6:47 PM, debian-gcc at lists dot
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-04 06:28 ---
Subject: Re: New: Missed optimization with complex long double
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 3, 2010, at 11:21 PM, svfuerst at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
gcc 4.4 compiles the following
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-04-01 08:50 ---
Subject: Re: New: bootstrap fails: /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal
error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or directory
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:03 AM, jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-26 16:14 ---
Subject: Re: ICE on objc.dg/objc-gc-4.m -fgnu-runtime
I think there is an already filed bug about this option with the gnu
runtime also. This option should not be supported or a nop there.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-13 03:59 ---
Subject: Re: New: keyword 'and' defined when even in the absence of iso646
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 12, 2010, at 7:54 PM, mdjones0978-gcc at yahoo dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
= test.cpp
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 11:41 ---
Subject: Re: New: trivial types are not being statically initialized
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:24 AM, eric dot niebler at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
According to the C++0x
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 17:01 ---
Subject: Re: New: __is_pod seems broken
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:03 AM, matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
On r157245 (and former revisions) this testcase will abort
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 17:37 ---
Subject: Re: New: Generate an XML dump of the parse tree
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:26 AM, jrevans1 at earthlink dot net
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
Essentially I would like a feature
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 18:15 ---
Subject: Re: multilib bootstrap broken.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:11 AM, pluto at agmk dot net gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-03-11 18:11
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-01 10:38 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Worse code generated with -O2
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 1, 2010, at 2:29 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-01 15:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] SPU-elf ICEs on simple programs
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 1, 2010, at 3:51 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from rguenth
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-02 05:24 ---
Subject: Re: New: Structure copies not vectorized
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:23 PM, astrange at ithinksw dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
Source:
#include emmintrin.h
struct a1 { char l
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 13:06 ---
Subject: Re: New: Endianness and Optimization
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 27, 2010, at 2:56 AM, kai dot extern at googlemail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
The attached code (which tries to generically
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-02-23 16:02 ---
Subject: Re: Partial optimization
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 23, 2010, at 7:53 AM, bangerth at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #3 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-02-23 15:53
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-02-23 16:29 ---
Subject: Re: Partial optimization
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 23, 2010, at 8:16 AM, bschindler at inf dot ethz dot ch
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #6 from bschindler at inf dot ethz dot ch
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-02-20 09:00 ---
Subject: Re: at this point in file warnings are upside down
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 19, 2010, at 10:51 PM, glenn at zewt dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #3 from glenn at zewt dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-02-20 11:00 ---
Subject: Re: c-c++-common/pr41779.c doesn't work
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 20, 2010, at 2:40 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-02-19 16:05 ---
Subject: Re: New: g++ does not allow overloading operators for sse types
(__m128, __m128d)
Well there is already a builtin operator+ for vector types with the
generic vector support.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 19
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-02-16 17:51 ---
Subject: Re: Optimizer ignores type in a conversion
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 16, 2010, at 9:37 AM, 0xe2 dot 0x9a dot 0x9b at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
--- Comment #5 from 0xe2 dot 0x9a
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-02-04 16:36 ---
Subject: Re: Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used
when there is none
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 4, 2010, at 2:48 AM, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-01-07 17:18 ---
Subject: Re: Optimizer breaks boost shared_ptr
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, rlogel at navtech dot aero
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #5 from rlogel at navtech dot aero
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 13:14 ---
Subject: Re: New: wrong code with -O1
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 30, 2009, at 7:56 AM, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
current trunk/branches on x86_64-linux-gnu. return
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-27 19:12 ---
Subject: Re: New: A problem with -maltivec
Can you attach the preprocessed source for the configure test that is
failing? It looks like the context sensitive keywords is causing the
header to fail to compile.
Sent
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-16 14:31 ---
Subject: Re: New: DWARF .debug_macinfo contains unused macros
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 16, 2009, at 6:12 AM, jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
-g3 currently produces huge
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-14 22:44 ---
Subject: Re: lto-elf.c fails to compile on IRIX 6.5
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 14, 2009, at 2:35 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-08 19:57 ---
Subject: Re: Code optimized for AMD Geode is slower than generic
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:52 AM, rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #4 from rootkit85
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-08 20:29 ---
Subject: Re: New: Incorrect stack setup on x86_64
The x86_64 abi includes a red zone. So I doubt this a bug in gcc
unless netbsd's abi does not match what gcc does.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 8, 2009, at 12:25 PM
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-04 13:57 ---
Subject: Re: -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:32 AM, rguenther at suse dot de
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-10-11 17:48 ---
Subject: Re: bootstrap *using* lto fails
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:13 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
is this valid cross translation-unit if T is used across units?
Yes
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-24 05:54 ---
Subject: Re: New: O2 optimizes out assignment to bitfield
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:22 PM, jim at bodwin dot us gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
Incorrect code is produced for the following
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-08 08:13 ---
Subject: Re: New: Optimizer handles loops with volatiles and post-incr. wrong
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 8, 2009, at 12:32 AM, bastian dot schick at sciopta dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-07 03:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: dereferencing type-punned pointer warnings cannot be
disabled
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 6, 2009, at 6:12 PM, mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot
cuni dot cz gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-07 03:48 ---
Subject: Re: dereferencing type-punned pointer warnings cannot be disabled
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 6, 2009, at 6:34 PM, mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot
cuni dot cz gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-07 03:50 ---
Subject: Re: dereferencing type-punned pointer warnings cannot be disabled
Thus code is undefined you have an acess of a char array as a struct.
Yes you are only taking the address of an element but it is still
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-04 01:38 ---
Subject: Re: New: Bus error caused by ldd/std instructions in struct copy.
This code is undefined because of alignment requirments differences
for the structs and the union.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 3, 2009, at 6
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-06-25 19:33 ---
Subject: Re: nop insertion does not look see restrict pointers
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 25, 2009, at 12:30 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #6 from rguenth
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-06-17 13:12 ---
Subject: Re: -mno-sched-prolog breaks function parameter debug location lists
This option should just be removed.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:21 AM, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-06-07 07:23 ---
Subject: Re: New: Array + XOR swap fails
Both of these are undefined. Look up about sequence point rules.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2009, at 12:15 AM, ashutosh dot sharma dot 0204 at gmail
dot com gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 23:13 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.5 Regression] ./plugin-version.h:11: error:
'gcc_version' defined but not used
Looks like this failson non elf hosts (well darwin supports dlopen so
I don't understand why it fails on darwin
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-04-27 07:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 Regression] libjavamath is linking against libgmp
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 26, 2009, at 11:54 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #3 from
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
