https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115198
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
||14.1.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Known to work||15.0
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
Should be fixed on trunk now, sadly the fix isn't suitable for backporting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115139
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
:00 |2024-05-21
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Confirmed, thanks for the reproducer.
Reduced:
$ cat 115159_a.H
struct QDebug;
template void f(T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115114
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114994
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115126
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-17
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114850
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109227
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeremypewterschmidt at gmail
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86933
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||420 at zerberste dot es
--- Comment #1
||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka ---
dup of PR86933 I think
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 86933 ***
||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113332
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112658
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|12.4
at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Fixed for GCC 14.2
||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
Fixed for GCC 14.2
|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
Fixed for GCC 14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114990
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
I reckon it's not something we can fix/implement in a point release of GCC 14,
but hopefully for 15...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114994
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114990
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 114889, which changed state.
Bug 114889 Summary: [modules] ICE in friend_accessible_p with imported class
template specialization befriending class template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114889
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114889
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|clauses allows undeclared |allows undeclared
|identifier |identifier
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
>From PR114946:
(In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99678
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka ---
dup
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 99678 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114913
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=110802
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
PR110802
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113141
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114630
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
The following seems to minimally fix it:
diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
index c35e70b8cb8..57ccaec5ebd 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
@@ -6798,7 +6798,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 106820, which changed state.
Bug 106820 Summary: [modules] ICE in function_and_variable_visibility with
modules and weakref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106820
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 106820, which changed state.
Bug 106820 Summary: [modules] ICE in function_and_variable_visibility with
modules and weakref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106820
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106820
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108059
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
FWIW a workaround for most valid code is to replace e.g. ignore_index_t,
where v is the problematic NTTP argument, with ignore_index_t.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114889
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114888
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114888
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
Yeah I think the TREE_TYPE of a compound type should never be null, at least as
far as type dependence is concerned.
|cross compiling binutils|cross compiling binutils
Keywords||ice-checking,
||ice-on-valid-code
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|NEW
||103524
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords||ice-checking, rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed||2024-04-29
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
$ cat testcase_a.C
export module mymod;
template
struct _Hashtable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111258
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
Many of these testcases (from here and the related PRs) are now accepted by GCC
14 after r14-10134.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114630
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #5)
> That said, my version doesn't actually solve the underlying issue: my
> adjustment of your testcase to put instantiations into the module purview
> (and force
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114630
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> And in 114630_c.C we no longer try to stream in the definition
> of _M_do_parse() twice, for some reason.
Oops, looks like we still stream in the definition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114630
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
,
||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2024-04-25
Summary|[14 Regression] ICE with|[11/12/13/14 Regression]
|default initializer of |checking ICE with default
|const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114709
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] |[12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105841
--- Comment #16 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Haojian Wu from comment #15)
> Hi, I notice that the __is_deducible was hidden in the commit
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/
> 30556bf81f4385c2a9c449948865dbcf35664764.
>
> Is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94061
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6)
> It seems reasonable for this to work but there might be a defect, or at
> least lack of clarity, in the standard in this situation.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94061
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114685
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 114600, which changed state.
Bug 114600 Summary: [14 Regression] [modules] redefinition errors when using
certain std headers in GMF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to m.cencora from comment #10)
> Created attachment 57924 [details]
> Full "std' modules with workarounds
>
> Here is an improved version of "std" module, with workarounds for:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114795
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka ---
The "invalid conversion in return statement" error should hopefully be fixed
now.
|1
Last reconfirmed||2024-04-23
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
Reduced version of comment #6 testcase:
$ cat 114795_a.H
template
struct A {
auto f() { return 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114709
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
|--- |14.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
This seems fixed for GCC 14 after r14-9943
||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
This seems fixed for GCC 14 after r14-9943-gd74fe10b13336b.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 105106, which changed state.
Bug 105106 Summary: Non-dependent call with defaulted NTTP lambda fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105106
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105106
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114632
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Looks like static op() lambdas are affected too:
struct S {};
auto lambda = [](auto, const int x) static /* -> void */ {};
int main()
{
void (*func)(int, int) = lambda;
return 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107168
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112769
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110006
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12 Regression] friend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106820
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62a0ef0d02cbb74cd865c1db2ecb7ca1b11f87cd
commit r14-9959-g62a0ef0d02cbb74cd865c1db2ecb7ca1b11f87cd
Author: Nathaniel Shead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 104548, which changed state.
Bug 104548 Summary: parser rejects alias template id of lambda in
unevaluated-context and accepts when no alias is used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104548
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430
Bug 107430 depends on bug 104548, which changed state.
Bug 104548 Summary: parser rejects alias template id of lambda in
unevaluated-context and accepts when no alias is used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104548
What
|--- |14.0
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Fixed for GCC 14 by the PR114393 fixes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106821
Bug 106821 depends on bug 106221, which changed state.
Bug 106221 Summary: lamba inside a decltype in a using statement does not
always work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430
Bug 107430 depends on bug 106221, which changed state.
Bug 106221 Summary: lamba inside a decltype in a using statement does not
always work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106821
Bug 106821 depends on bug 106221, which changed state.
Bug 106221 Summary: lamba inside a decltype in a using statement does not
always work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430
Bug 107430 depends on bug 106221, which changed state.
Bug 106221 Summary: lamba inside a decltype in a using statement does not
always work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106221
What|Removed
|--- |DUPLICATE
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
dup of the recently fixed PR92707
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 92707 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92707
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||elliot.haisley at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 92211, which changed state.
Bug 92211 Summary: Lamdas in unevaluated context bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92211
What|Removed |Added
|RESOLVED
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
This seems fixed for GCC 14 after r14-9938 / r14-9943 for PR114393.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113141
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df7bfdb7dbf2d46aa5768a0280d4dcfcc868b7f9
commit r14-9947-df7bfdb7dbf2d46aa5768a0280d4dcfcc868b7f9
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113141
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d435571b54b02946c97b5b24f20e5a7058fd96a1
commit r14-9946-gd435571b54b02946c97b5b24f20e5a7058fd96a1
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114303
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99426, which changed state.
Bug 99426 Summary: [modules] failed to read compiled module cluster 1186: Bad
file data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99426
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 99426, which changed state.
Bug 99426 Summary: [modules] failed to read compiled module cluster 1186: Bad
file data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99426
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99426
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99426
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:716af95fd454871473c4b118b8412b6a68459b75
commit r14-9948-716af95fd454871473c4b118b8412b6a68459b75
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 93595, which changed state.
Bug 93595 Summary: [c++20] function call, substitution failure of template
parameter with a lambda default in template context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93595
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93595
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93595
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:081c1e93d56d35c7314ed68e6d87628b430de917
commit r14-9938-081c1e93d56d35c7314ed68e6d87628b430de917
Author: Patrick Palka
c++:
|RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
Fixed for GCC 14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430
Bug 107430 depends on bug 107457, which changed state.
Bug 107457 Summary: ICE when template lambda alias used as default template
argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107457
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107457
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114393
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114393
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d74fe10b13336b9de2e025ced4af00a25ff1d3e7
commit r14-9943-d74fe10b13336b9de2e025ced4af00a25ff1d3e7
Author: Patrick Palka
c++:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114393
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:081c1e93d56d35c7314ed68e6d87628b430de917
commit r14-9938-081c1e93d56d35c7314ed68e6d87628b430de917
Author: Patrick Palka
c++:
,
||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=94885
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Non-concepts testcase:
struct b { explicit b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92707
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114654
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
with
|corrupt gcm |submodule causes corrupt
||gcm
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org,
||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99426
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka ---
Huh, interesting! If --param=ggc-min-expand=1 doesn't help then it's most
likely a distinct bug. A testcase would be much appreciated if possible.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #4)
> In general we don't yet implement merging of textual redefinitions; I guess
> this ultimately falls under that, but I'm not sure we have a dedicated bug
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
1 - 100 of 2892 matches
Mail list logo
