[Bug sanitizer/95137] Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137 --- Comment #45 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- (In reply to niek from comment #43) > Does this mean (and could you please reconfirm) that bug 95317 has > disappeared in trunk (which will become GCC 12)? Hi, I am not working on a project

[Bug target/97734] GCC using branches when a conditional move would be better

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97734 --- Comment #3 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- I just realized I made a mistake when producing the reduced testcase. The argument x should have been an uint32_t. Unfortunately, with that fix gcc always produces a branch. ICC still produces a

[Bug target/97734] New: GCC using branches when a conditional move would be better

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97734 Bug ID: 97734 Summary: GCC using branches when a conditional move would be better Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/90295] Please define ~exception_ptr inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90295 --- Comment #5 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- > Fixed for GCC 11, and not plausible to backport. Thank you so much! Looking forward to GCC 11.