--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:29 ---
GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:29
---
GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:30 ---
GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:30 ---
GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:30 ---
GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:30 ---
GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6 regression] struct-by- |[4.6 Regression] struct-by-
|value-1.c fail
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6 regression] ICE|[4.6 Regression] ICE
|building 64-bit libjava
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.3/4.4 Regression, avr] |[4.3/4.4 Regression] wrong
|wrong epilogue
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 12:06 ---
- (set_attr mode SF)])
+ (set_attr mode SF,SF,*)])
SI?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45142
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 12:12 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 12:13 ---
Subject: Bug 45052
Author: rguenth
Date: Sat Jul 31 12:12:43 2010
New Revision: 162781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162781
Log:
2010-07-31 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 09:22 ---
It can't be the same bug, please open a new one. Thx.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 09:32 ---
I see the same with -m32 on x86_64. Interestingly I see it with -O0
and libgfortran from 4.5 as well, so it looks like a frontend problem, not
a library problem to me.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45137
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45134
gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: x86-64-*-*, i?86-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45142
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 11:01 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 11:01 ---
Subject: Bug 45141
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 30 11:01:22 2010
New Revision: 162709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162709
Log:
2010-07-30 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 14:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=21360)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21360action=view)
required patch
Together with attached patch (from the vector-enhancement GSoC project).
#define vector(elcount
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 09:37 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 09:40 ---
Confirmed. In the original code b doesn't overflow.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 10:01 ---
Confirmed, mine.
We generate wrong constraints for
bar (int * * x)
{
int * D.2737;
bb 2:
D.2737_3 = MEM[(struct Foo *)x_1(D) + -8B].p;
*D.2737_3 = 0;
return;
}
Generating constraints for bar (bar
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45119
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 11:00
---
Subject: Bug 45034
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 29 10:59:54 2010
New Revision: 162673
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162673
Log:
2010-07-29 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 11:00
---
Fixed on the trunk sofar.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 11:25 ---
Possible values for vus are [0, 65535], volatileness does not change that.
Multiplying this as int is always positive (overflow is undefined), so
we can change the test to (vus * vus) != 0.
--
rguenth at gcc dot
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 11:34 ---
Thus, invalid.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 12:30 ---
Subject: Bug 45120
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 29 12:30:09 2010
New Revision: 162676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162676
Log:
2010-07-29 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 12:31 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 13:27 ---
And with all other versions I tried (4.3 and 4.5)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45126
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 13:30 ---
rar is not a portable archive format. Please use tar instead together with
gzip (or zip).
You might want to try -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45127
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 09:32
---
I suppose that
uy = -ux;
is really
uy = (unsigned char) -(int) ux;
as unsigned char promotes to int. We then incorrectly
narrow this to -(signed char) ux.
We do this again in convert_to_integer. Our
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 09:34 ---
Can reproduce with 4.5.0, fixed for 4.5.1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 10:33
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 10:33
---
Subject: Bug 44903
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 28 10:32:54 2010
New Revision: 162624
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162624
Log:
2010-07-28 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 12:23
---
Works.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 14:01 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Subject: Re: casting of variadic function pointers to normal
function pointers causes segfaults on 64bit systems
I was afraid of this answer.
However in my application, I have
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45104
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45107
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 14:43 ---
This seems fixed, just the optimizations in question are already performed
partly by FRE but one,
test2 (struct foo2 * x)
{
...
bb 2:
D.2745_3 = BIT_FIELD_REF *x_2(D), 8, 0;
D.2746_4 = D.2745_3 1;
if (D
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 19:36 ---
Confirmed on x86_64-linux. Not similar to PR44946, but I fixed a similar bug
on the mem-ref branch.
Thus, mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45112
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 20:05 ---
We can only value-number things which define an SSA name.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 09:17 ---
Trying to reduce ... it happens only with whopr.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x005d33ba in prune_unused_types_mark (die=0x0, dokids=1)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 09:26 ---
So the issue may be that the LTO FE doesn't announce any decls to the debug
machinery.
grep debug_hooks cp/*.c
cp/decl.c:debug_hooks-type_decl (tdecl, 0);
cp/decl.c: /*debug_hooks-set_name (t
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 09:46 ---
Well - I have no idea ;) We can look at what the FE announces after I finished
testcase reduction.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 11:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=21325)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21325action=view)
testcase
g++ -r -nostdlib -O[s23] -g -flto d2.3.3.C d3.3.3.C
The key is that nsAccessible are not merged
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 13:03 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 13:05 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 13:05 ---
Subject: Bug 44977
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 27 13:05:17 2010
New Revision: 162565
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162565
Log:
2010-07-27 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 13:07
---
Subject: Bug 44555
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 27 13:07:28 2010
New Revision: 162566
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162566
Log:
2010-07-27 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 09:06
---
(In reply to comment #11)
I think this testcase has some other issues at least on the trunk.
sparc_floating_p.isra.0 is produced for 32bit but not 64bit.
And then we have:
MEM[(const struct type *)type_1(D
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 09:27 ---
Subject: Bug 45052
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 26 09:26:43 2010
New Revision: 162528
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162528
Log:
2010-07-26 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45067
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 10:33 ---
I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45072
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45073
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 11:00 ---
Invalid MEMs in debug-insns (invalid as in not folded). Why does the
scheduler query the alias oracle about them?
(debug_insn 49 48 50 7 t.cc:22 (var_location:DI D#3 (mem/s/f/j:DI (plus:DI
(reg/f:DI 54 virtual
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 12:21
---
One of the issues is
/* For a MEM rtx, the alignment in bits. We can use the alignment of the
mode as a default when STRICT_ALIGNMENT, but not if not. */
#define MEM_ALIGN(RTX
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 12:45
---
Created an attachment (id=21314)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21314action=view)
patch
Please check whether the attached patch fixes the testcase this bug is about.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 12:45
---
Mine again (only for restoring the pre-MEM_REF behavior).
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 12:48 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 12:49 ---
Subject: Bug 45071
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 26 12:48:37 2010
New Revision: 162534
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162534
Log:
2010-07-26 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 13:26 ---
I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 13:29 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 13:29 ---
Subject: Bug 45056
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 26 13:29:14 2010
New Revision: 162536
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162536
Log:
2010-07-26 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 13:56 ---
struct class$field_p
struct class$field_p
looks more like a frontend issue.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 14:49 ---
Subject: Bug 45073
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 26 14:48:43 2010
New Revision: 162537
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162537
Log:
2010-07-26 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 14:49 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 16:02
---
Subject: Bug 43784
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jul 26 16:01:55 2010
New Revision: 162539
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162539
Log:
2010-07-26 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 16:02
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 14:37 ---
Confirmed. I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 16:24
---
Fixed then.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 16:38 ---
It does since
2010-06-20 Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com
* compare-debug: Drop LTO sections.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 16:46 ---
Hm, I can't reproduce this anymore. Thus, fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 16:49 ---
Subject: Bug 43212
Author: rguenth
Date: Sat Jul 24 16:49:38 2010
New Revision: 162501
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162501
Log:
2010-07-24 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 16:58 ---
Subject: Bug 43788
Author: rguenth
Date: Sat Jul 24 16:58:19 2010
New Revision: 162502
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162502
Log:
2010-07-24 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 16:58 ---
Works for me.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 19:09 ---
Caused by tree-ssa-reassoc.c
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45062
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45061
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 20:40 ---
Mine then.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 21:42 ---
Please attach preprocessed source.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 08:49 ---
Mine. IPA-CP makes us produce
MEM[(unnamed-signed:64[0:] * restrict)C.3242][__result_find52_49]
but nobody folds this (C.3242 is constant zero) because the access is likely
undefined.
--
rguenth at gcc dot
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 08:51 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 10:15 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 10:15 ---
Subject: Bug 45037
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 23 10:15:27 2010
New Revision: 162451
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=162451
Log:
2010-07-23 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 10:25 ---
Reduced testcase:
struct JSContext;
struct JSObject;
class WorkerHooks {
virtual JSObject *newGlobalObject(JSContext *cx) = 0;
};
int
shell(JSContext *cx, int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
{
class
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Summary|ICE in cselib_record_set|[4.5
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 11:20 ---
Confirmed. But I think this might trigger undefined behavior according to
the C standard as you are doing
v.e.b = v.d.b;
which has overlapping lhs/rhs. And we end up with
rp:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 11:36 ---
We still need to deal with it in the middle-end. I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 11:40 ---
Hm, no. I think tree-nrv.c is correct. I was playing with
Index: gcc/tree-nrv.c
===
--- gcc/tree-nrv.c (revision 162450)
+++ gcc/tree-nrv.c
--- Comment #34 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 11:41
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 11:47 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 11:48 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
601 - 700 of 14880 matches
Mail list logo
