https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113433
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113428
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113426
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113374
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
Note that the default C long double is what is controlled by
--with-long-double-128 and --with-long-double-format, those configs do not tell
you
whether using __ieee128 with -mabi=ieeelongdouble will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113373
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113371
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
For example gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94969.c has
int a = 0, b = 0, c = 0;
struct S {
signed m : 7;
signed e : 2;
};
struct S f[2] = {{0, 0}, {0, 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113395
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Without fully lowering this on GIMPLE we could substitute the representative
for the bitfield member in the MEM_EXPR and adjust adjust_address_1 to
instead of using attrs.size to constrain the extent of
||2024-01-16
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
For next stage1.
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
For pointer-to-integer conversions we need to know whether to sign- or
zero-extend. For the default address-space using ptr_mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113411
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113407
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113403
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113402
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I'm OK with renaming (but then some namespace prefix would be nice, at least
two underscores, but __gcc_ might be better)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Gaius Mulley from comment #14)
> Ah apologies, is it best that I revert:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;
> h=81d5ca0b9b8431f1bd7a5ec8a2c94f04bb0cf032
>
> happy to do this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113372
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> Created attachment 57085 [details]
> gcc14-pr113372.patch
>
> The non-propagation workaround which seems to fix^H^H^Hworkaround all those
> 4 issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113399
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113400
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112580
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 112580, which changed state.
Bug 112580 Summary: [14 Regression]: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-4_b.C et al;
ICE tree check: expected class 'type', have 'declaration'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112580
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111850
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111811
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113372
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
So the key would be to make the object live again after a CLOBBER when such
address SSA name is used (but before any other explicit mention appears)?
The current algorithm relies on explitic mentions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113397
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113372
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> So, couldn't we attempt at least a partial workaround at add_scope_conflicts
> time?
> I mean, for SSA_NAME uses in statements with some caching try to check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113395
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|RTL expansion drops |RTL expansion of bitfield
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113395
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Because of
#0 adjust_address_1 (memref=0x771e8db0, mode=E_HImode, offset=...,
validate=1, adjust_address=1, adjust_object=1, size=...)
at /space/rguenther/src/gcc/gcc/emit-rtl.cc:2409
#1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113385
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
struct S {
signed m : 7;
signed e : 2;
} g;
void
k()
{
g.e ^= 1;
}
expands as
(insn 8 7 0 (parallel [
(set (mem/j/c:HI (reg/f:DI 100) [0 +0 S2 A32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113390
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target
|P1
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed. The ICE means that loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113380
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Interesting - smells like fold-const.cc stuff not in match.pd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113378
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113379
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113374
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113373
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113371
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113369
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113364
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113361
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
,
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target||aarch64
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
All these might also point to IPA mod-ref issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113358
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target||powerpc*-*-*
Summary|Many powerpc platforms do |[14 Regression] Many
|_not_ have support for |powerpc platforms do _not_
|IEEE754 long double
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Honza? Why do we consider to split before anotherfunc(5)? It's an odd
place since we'll always arrive there from the point we insert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110084
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110079
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-07-10 00:00:00 |2024-1-12
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109943
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109943
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
With the __builtin_unreachable present (thus g >= 0) we simplify
(int)(char)d to d & 255 which causes the VN difference:
Value numbering stmt = _9 = (int) _8;
+d.4_7 is available for d.4_7
+_2 is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109925
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
This is a failure to jump-thread because of size limits. If we'd limit
the backward threader the same way as the forward threader we'd optimize this
(--param fsm-scale-path-stmts=1).
--param max-jump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23)
> Couldn't we conditionalize that
> if (!opt_for_fn (node->decl, optimize)
> /* With -Og we do not want to perform IPA inlining of small
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #18 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109781
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109596
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109770
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109621
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109559
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|s390|s390*-*-*
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |accepts-invalid
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108382
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.4.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 regression] new test |[13 regression] new test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106760
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113126
Bug 113126 depends on bug 113344, which changed state.
Bug 113344 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/pr15784-1.c fails after
r14-7139-g897b95a12b7fe5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113344
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113344
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/gcc/alias.cc b/gcc/alias.cc
index b2ec4806d22..0150dd699db 100644
--- a/gcc/alias.cc
+++ b/gcc/alias.cc
@@ -2272,6 +2272,8 @@ static bool
base_alias_check (rtx x, rtx x_base, rtx y, rtx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.3.1, 13.2.1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112301
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
This caused PR113347 (did you forget to mark the bug fixed?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 110997, which changed state.
Bug 110997 Summary: [13 Regression] internal compiler error: in
cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:8005
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107687
Bug 107687 depends on bug 110997, which changed state.
Bug 110997 Summary: [13 Regression] internal compiler error: in
cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:8005
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Summary|[13/14
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
testing a fix (on GENERIC, is_truth_type_for doesn't work for non-vector
compares since we tend to have just 'int' as result)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE during gimplification |[13 Regression] ICE during
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 57047
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57047=edit
preprocessed source
1501 - 1600 of 53333 matches
Mail list logo
