--- Comment #6 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-07-06
22:04 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] ICE during extc++.h pch generation on Tru64 UNIX
V5.1B
The same ICE happens on Solaris 10/x86 (i386-pc-solaris2.10).
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #5 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-07-06
20:19 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] ICE during extc++.h pch generation on Tru64 UNIX
V5.1B
falk at debian dot org writes:
> Can you give the .ii for that?
Sure, done.
Rainer
--
h
--- Comment #2 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-07-06
20:10 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] ICE during extc++.h pch generation on Tru64 UNIX
V5.1B
Even if I add directly to extc++.h (a complete hack), the
compilation errors about iconv_t missing are gone, but the
--- Comment #3 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-30
18:03 ---
Subject: Re: disable-threads causes undefined reference to pthread_kill and
pthread_sigmask
I've noticed the same problem on IRIX 6.5 (which still uses
THREADS=single), cf. PR libgcj/
--- Comment #8 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-21
18:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> > Ok, thanks for the explanation. But right now, the FSF tree has M_F
--- Comment #6 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-21
17:35 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Long answer: we want to be able to turn synchronous signals into regular Ada
> exce
--- Comment #4 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-12
17:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Right, it's another kind of SJLJ exceptions, purely front-end based. Excerp
--- Comment #2 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-09
15:36 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Confirmed, this happens when the compiler is configured for SJLJ exceptions.
But t
--- Comment #5 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-08
20:23 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] libjava fails to build if it isn't built by
default
ayers at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> I followed the advice given here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
--- Comment #3 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-08
19:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] libjava fails to build if it isn't built by
default
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Maybe it is better to not to disable libjava completely for IRIX. It se
--- Comment #4 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-08
17:24 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] gnatbind fails to link on Tru64 UNIX
charlet at adacore dot com writes:
> Subject: Re: New: gnatbind fails to link on Tru64 UNIX
>
> > Add ada/s-purexc.o
--- Comment #3 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-06
12:54 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] libgcc_s.so.1 causes SEGV on Solaris 10/x86
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Rainer, there is no test case and no description for how to reproduce this.
I could
--- Comment #2 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-02
17:24 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] libgomp fails to configure on IRIX 5.3
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00084.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27540
--- Comment #3 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-05-10
21:28 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] libgomp bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX V4.0F
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> PR 26161 might had fixed this.
No, the problem persists as of 20060
--- Comment #12 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-02-21
19:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] libobjc bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX
V4.0F
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> I can't really look into it because it's specific to an OS I don&
--- Comment #4 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-02-15
22:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] libobjc bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX
V4.0F
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Hmm, where is defining _XOPEN_SOURCE needed anyways, I will approve the rev
--- Comment #5 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-02-02
12:32 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] Misdetection of COMDAT group support with
GNU as and non-GNU ld
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> We could have a --enable-comdat option, or, as you say,
--- Comment #12 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-02-01
19:00 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] Many Solaris 10/x86 testsuite failures with
native as: use of .word
I've now tried this patch on the 4.1 branch, and many testsuite failures
due to missing .word su
--- Comment #7 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-02-01
12:31 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Use of u_int32_t in libgcc-math breaks bootstrap
on Solaris 10/x86
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Oh, I thought you did the config/stdint.m4 fallback, too. I
--- Comment #4 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-02-01
12:18 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Use of u_int32_t in libgcc-math breaks bootstrap
on Solaris 10/x86
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Can you provide the patch that fixed the issue for you?
S
--- Comment #7 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-01-31
22:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure with SGI
7.4.3m ld: GOT overflow
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Leaving "critical" bugs as UNCONFIRMED isn'
--- Comment #11 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-01-31
21:56 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] Many Solaris 10/x86 testsuite failures with
native as: use of .word
A --disable-multilib (the amd64 doesn't yet work with Solaris as) bootstrap
with the nati
--- Comment #10 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-01-31
20:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] Many Solaris 10/x86 testsuite failures with
native as: use of .word
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Can you try this patch:
sure, bootstrap in progr
--- Comment #8 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-01-31
19:36 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] Many Solaris 10/x86 testsuite failures with
native as: use of .word
> pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
>What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-01-31
19:11 ---
Subject: Re: Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86 with native as
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> No feedback in 3 months (T-4 days).
I hadn't tried a bootstrap with the native as i
--- Comment #7 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-01-10
23:18 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] Many tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1 tests
fail on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> No feedback for way more than 5 months, and not reconfirmed
--- Comment #6 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-01-10
22:32 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure with SGI
7.4.3m ld: GOT overflow
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> However, it may well be a linker bug, as suggested in comment
--- Comment #4 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2005-10-12
17:42 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure with SGI 7.4.3m
ld: GOT overflow
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> what GCC are you starting with since it is dying in building sta
--- Comment #2 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2005-10-12
17:32 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure with SGI 7.4.3m
ld: GOT overflow
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Isn't this really a bug in ld?
I'm not sure, given
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-08-16 19:33 ---
Subject: Re: libgfortran doesn't compile on Tru64 UNIX V4.0F
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Any news?
Sorry for the delay: I've been ill for several weeks and am still catc
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-08-12 18:34 ---
Subject: Re: Many Solaris 10/x86 testsuite failures with native as: use of
.word
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> I was not the first person to add .word to the .md file.
The only ot
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-08-12 18:21 ---
Subject: Re: Many Solaris 10/x86 testsuite failures with native as: use of
.word
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> This is a bug in the native as, please report instead to the Sun. A
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-08-12 18:11 ---
Subject: Re: New: Many Solaris 10/x86 testsuite failures with native as: use
of .word
The same bug also affects libssp
/vol/gcc/obj/gcc-4.1.0-20050805/10-gcc/./gcc/xgcc
-B/vol/gcc/obj/gcc-4.1.0
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-07-07 17:58 ---
Subject: Re: Interix: "copying ..." when making libgcj takes too long
"klaus dot kusche at inode dot at" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've just observed the same pro
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-07-07 17:11 ---
Subject: Re: Many attribute directive ignored warnings during Tru64 UNIX Ada
bootstrap
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu writes:
> It is a latent bug in Ada front-end. RTH just exposed
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-07-05 17:15 ---
Subject: Re: Many attribute directive ignored warnings during Tru64 UNIX Ada
bootstrap
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu writes:
> It is a latent bug in Ada front-end. RTH just exposed
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-07-05 17:04 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] Cannot build gnattools on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Given your last comment (a variable set to 4), it still looks very much l
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-28 20:36 ---
Subject: Re: New: Tru64 UNIX testsuite failure: gcc.dg/vect/pr18536.c: ICE in
in alphaev4_insn_pipe
There are several more identical failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-1char.c (test for
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-28 13:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Many tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1 tests fail on
Tru64 UNIX V5.1B
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Do these work now?
No, they still fail as of 20050
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-20 15:18 ---
Subject: Re: New IRIX 6.5 testsuite failures with gas: .space repeat count is
zero, ignored
echristo at redhat dot com writes:
> Did you happen to catch where the .space 0 were being emit
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-15 22:01 ---
Subject: Re: New IRIX 6.5 testsuite failures with gas: .space repeat count is
zero, ignored
echristo at redhat dot com writes:
> Did you happen to catch where the .space 0 were being emit
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-15 09:30 ---
Subject: Re: libgfortran doesn't compile on IRIX 5.3
Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de writes:
> ro at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> > --- Additional Comme
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-14 23:56 ---
Subject: Re: New testsuite failure on Tru64 UNIX V4.0F: g++.dg/eh/cleanup1.C
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> A backtrace would be nice.
Sure: after running the test invocation w
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-14 23:47 ---
Subject: Re: All gfortran execution tests fail on Tru64 UNIX V4.0F: scalbn
unresolved
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Well, attached patch should clear this point, and hopefully
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-14 02:29 ---
Subject: Re: boehm-gc doesn't compile on Solaris 10/amd64
See
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/2005-June/000864.html
for my first hacky patch.
Rainer
--
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-14 02:29 ---
Subject: Re: boehm-gc gctest fails on Solaris 10/x86
See
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/2005-June/000864.html
for my first hacky patch.
Rainer
--
http
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-13 15:08 ---
Subject: Re: All gfortran execution tests fail on Tru64 UNIX V4.0F: scalbn
unresolved
> is very portable). What about the naïve implementation:
>
> double scalbn (double x, int n) {
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-10 17:09 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] New testsuite failure
g++.dg/warn/conversion-function-1.C
I've also observed this on mips-sgi-irix5.3 and mips-sgi-irix6.5, so this
may even be generic (at leas
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-09 23:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] Cannot build gnattools on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B
I've done some further debugging and found what's going on: running the
failing gnatmake invokation
% ../.
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-09 18:54 ---
Subject: Re: New: O32 libffi.so fails to link on IRIX 6
Patch submitted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q2/msg00685.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21943
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-09 18:53 ---
Subject: Re: libgfortran doesn't compile on IRIX 5.3
Patch submitted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00902.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15266
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-06-08 13:34 ---
Subject: Re: All gfortran execution tests fail on Tru64 UNIX V4.0F: scalbn
unresolved
The same problem exists on IRIX 6.5.10 (once a patch for libfortran/15266,
to be submitted after testing is
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-04-29 19:57 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range building 176.gcc with -O2
Unfortunately, even with the patch applied, the Ada bootstrap failure on
i386-pc-solaris2.10 remains unchanged, a
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2005-01-14 18:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] libjava bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX:
CPPFLAGS changed in libltdl
kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Could someone please verify that this patch fixes
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-11-24 14:34 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression]Ada bootstrap failure on IRIX 6.5: tb-gcc.c
missing
hainque at act-europe dot fr writes:
> pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> > Caused by:
>
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-11-24 14:24 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] libjava bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX:
CPPFLAGS changed in libltdl
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Perhaps it is a ksh quoting bug. Or perhaps
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-11-22 14:18 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Bus error compiling makegpr.adb on Mac OS X 10.3
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> I cannot even get even passed stage1 anymore:
> gcc -c -g -no-cpp-p
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-11-19 23:12 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Ada Bootstrap failures on powerpc-darwin with
undefined symbol (__Unwind_fallback_frame_state_for)
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Using your hint
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-11-19 22:33 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Ada Bootstrap failures on powerpc-darwin with
undefined symbol (__Unwind_fallback_frame_state_for)
As a workaround, I've changed all instances of -lgcc -lgcc_
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-11-11 23:44 ---
Subject: Re: Cannot build gnattools on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> I thought we declared that Ada building on alpha-dec-osf was broken and
> should have been
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-11-08 16:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Sun CC cannot bootstrap GCC (static inline)
The following patch allowed me to successfully bootstrap on
sparc-sun-solaris2.10 with Sun Studio 8 cc. I'
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-11-08 14:39 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/SPARC: ICE in
reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Great! But it&#x
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-11-08 14:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/SPARC: ICE in
reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Rainer, any news on t
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-11-08 14:07 ---
Subject: Re: ACATS test c94002f hangs on Solaris 10/x86
Rerunning the bootstrap on 20041105 with s10_70 (i.e. the first build
supporting AMD64, but still running in 32-bit mode for the moment
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-10-29
18:18 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/SPARC: ICE in
reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Can you attach
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-10-28
16:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Solaris 10/x86 libobjc bootstrap
failure: invalid assembler code
Unfortunately the patch has remained unreviewed for a month now and the
bootstrap
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-10-08
15:10 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] uchar redefinition warnings in libcpp
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Does this still happen?
It did when I last bootstrapped mainline on alpha-dec-osf5
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9330
--- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2003-09-01
22:30 ---
Subject: Re: [alpha-osf]small alphaev56-dec-osf5.1 --enable-threads=posix problem
101 - 168 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
