https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109390
Bug ID: 109390
Summary: Does not reject specialized non-type argument of
dependent type in class template partial
specialization
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbergman at redhat dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106891
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106891
--- Comment #1 from Stephan Bergmann ---
Created attachment 53553
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53553=edit
preprocessed source, gzipped to avoid bugzilla size limit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106891
Bug ID: 106891
Summary: internal compiler error: in init_from_control_deps, at
gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1740
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106355
--- Comment #2 from Stephan Bergmann ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Did you see whether this is changed behavior from GCC 11?
I didn't check that myself, but the Debian LibreOffice maintainer claims that
he sees the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106355
Bug ID: 106355
Summary: Linux s390x -O2 argument passing miscompile
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
--- Comment #12 from Stephan Bergmann ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #11)
> The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81bec060e31b6ef2feeb3046c6f13a207c6f698a
>
> commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbergman at redhat dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105291
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105291
Bug ID: 105291
Summary: include/c++/12.0.1/debug/safe_unordered_container.h:71
:28: error: captured variable '__local_end' cannot
appear here
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104030
--- Comment #7 from Stephan Bergmann ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Of course, if something like libreoffice (I bet) carefully ensures it is
> paired, but constructs it from smaller separate literals, then it is fine.
(Or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104030
Bug ID: 104030
Summary: -Wbidi-chars should not warn about UCNs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104007
Bug ID: 104007
Summary: new (std::nothrow) S[n] always calls ~S
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103991
Bug ID: 103991
Summary: Bogus -Wreturn-type with constexpr if and local var
with destructor
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103597
Bug ID: 103597
Summary: False -Wimplicit-fallthrough= involving macro
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103022
Bug ID: 103022
Summary: std::begin on empty std::valarray causes
_GLIBCXX_DEBUG assertion
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102101
Bug ID: 102101
Summary: Another spurious -Warray-bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68257
--- Comment #10 from Stephan Bergmann ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> There does seems some inconsitency though:
> inline namespace n __attribute__((__abi_tag__(""))) {}
> is rejected but
> inline namespace n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101600
Bug ID: 101600
Summary: Spurious -Warray-bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797
--- Comment #6 from Stephan Bergmann ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #5)
> Stephan, can you verify that this fixes the LibreOffice issue?
Yes, thanks, tested the master branch fix and it fixes the LibreOffice issue
for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797
Bug ID: 100797
Summary: using declaration causing virtual call with wrongly
adjusted this pointer
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99446
--- Comment #3 from Stephan Bergmann ---
(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #2)
> At least with recent GCC master (bc2127767a0076afdbc9075fda29f97f82ef7ec6),
> I can consistently reproduce the following:
what I failed to include in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99446
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbergman at redhat dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98752
Bug ID: 98752
Summary: wrong "error: ‘this’ is not a constant expression"
with consteval constructor
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98305
--- Comment #3 from Stephan Bergmann ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/562141.html
Thanks; can confirm that fixes my LibreOffice build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98305
Bug ID: 98305
Summary: Incomprehensible -Wmismatched-new-delete warning
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
27 matches
Mail list logo
