[Bug ada/88042] New: ICE in output_operand: invalid address mode, with -mabi=ilp32

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: aarch64-*-* $ ./gnat1 -I ../../gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/ -I - -quiet -dumpbase

[Bug web/87933] Bad headers and titles for:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87933 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- Most like this is a texinfo 4 vs 5+ difference.

[Bug web/87933] Bad headers and titles for:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87933 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- Nope, the first one is unconditional.

[Bug web/87933] Bad headers and titles for:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87933 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- The first @settitle wins. $ grep @settitle gcc/doc/install.texi @settitle Installing GCC @settitle Installing GCC @settitle Host/Target specific installation notes for GCC @settitle Prerequisites for GCC @s

[Bug tree-optimization/86572] unsafe strlen folding of const arguments with non-const offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86572 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- This breaks aarch64 -mabi=ilp32. /opt/gcc/gcc-20181105/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/warn-strlen-no-nul.c:56:1: error: type mismatch in binary expression int int sizetype _1 = i1 + 1; /opt/gcc/gcc-20181105/gcc/te

[Bug c++/87861] [9 regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5165

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87861 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-09/msg01052.html

[Bug c++/87861] New: [9 regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5165

, ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: polacek at redhat dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: ia64-*-* libtool: compile

[Bug c/87857] case label does not reduce to an integer constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87857 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- 1<<31 is undefined in C, but not in C++ (since C++14).

[Bug d/87816] New: D runtime fails to build on aarch64

Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: aarch64-*-* /usr/aarch64-suse-linux/bin/ld: .libs/libgdruntime_la-threadasm.o: in function `fiber_switchContext': /opt/gcc/test/Build/aarch64

[Bug c/87794] Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87794 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/87795] Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87795 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 87794 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/87552] [9 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010102-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87552 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/87552] New: [9 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010102-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors)

: sch...@linux-m68k.org Blocks: 85458 Target Milestone: --- Target: ia64-*-* On ia64, priorities can become negative, thus the assertion in sel_target_adjust_priority is wrong. This only happens with -O3. during RTL pass: mach /usr/local/gcc/test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c

[Bug other/87549] Optimize fetch atomics with unused results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87549 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70149] [F08] Character pointer initialization causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- This generates wrong code on powerpc64, either the initializer or the size of _F.myptr_mod_MOD_number_string is wrong. .globl _F.myptr_mod_MOD_number_string .align 3 .type _F.myptr

[Bug target/86340] GCC 8.1 produces broken code for m68k with optimization levels above -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86340 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/87338] gcc 8.2 fails to bootstrap on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87338 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- I cannot reproduce that with the current 8.2 branch.

[Bug middle-end/87220] -fstack-check produces inefficient and wrong tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87220 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab --- (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #9) > FWIW, glibc supports building with -fstack-check and seems to be attempting > to use it for this purpose too. See for example > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug target/87281] qsort checking ICE in ia64_reorg building libgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87281 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Probably a dup of the various scheduler related qsort ICEs.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85458] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr83480.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85458 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/87131] 16bit xor operation results in 32bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87131 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/87112] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9334

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87112 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/87114] [9 regression] ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strnlen.c starting with r263855

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87114 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87014] [x32] __builtin_eh_return should use 64-bit mov to set return address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87014 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- It's a 32bit store, not a load.

[Bug target/87006] Stack Protection with Large File support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87006 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- If you are looking for help in fixing your program you should ask on gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org.

[Bug c++/86921] do not remove input in bash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86921 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86856] Warning: unknown conversion type for ASM_OUTPUT_REG_PUSH and ASM_OUTPUT_REG_POP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86856 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- %z has been added in gcc 8.

[Bug target/86820] [8 regression] gcc-8 miscompiles binutils on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86820] [8, regression] gcc-8 miscompiles binutils on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Does this help ?

[Bug c/86720] Missing symbol name in directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86720 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/86686] ICE Seg fault while building GCC 8.2 (using GCC 8.1) on intel x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86686 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Version|8.2.0 |8.1.0 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwa

[Bug c/86680] possible gcc optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86680 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab --- arch/h8300/kernel/sim-console.c:register const int fd __asm__("er0") = 1; /* stdout */

[Bug c/86667] [7/8/9 Regression] can no longer traverse environment table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86667 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- Why are you using empty constraints when a register is required?

[Bug testsuite/86671] New: Many testsuite failures due to -latomic not found

: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: riscv*-*-* A lot of tests fail due to missing set up to find the uninstalled -latomic during linking. This affects gcc, g++, libstdc++ and a large part

[Bug fortran/80645] FAIL: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_3.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|m68k-*-*, ia64-*-*, |m68k-*-*, ia64-*-*, |

[Bug c/86668] mixing ansi prototype with K&R definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86668 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86566] The preprocessor cpp6 loses line concatenation on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86566 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86482] arm vector instruction requiring allignment uses non alligned input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86482 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- If you have configured the compiler for the AAPCS ABI then the stack is required to be 64-bit aligned.

[Bug tree-optimization/86435] -fsemantic-interposition does not appear to have any effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86435 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- But the assembler is allowed to resolve the reference directly without the possibility for interposition.

[Bug target/86340] GCC 8.1 produces broken code for m68k with optimization levels above -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86340 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug bootstrap/78251] config/gettext.m4 and config/iconv.m4 contaminate CPPFLAGS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78251 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- If configure tests are nested then that's a bug in the way the tests are written.

[Bug c++/86400] New: [8 regression] set::set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86400 Bug ID: 86400 Summary: [8 regression] set::set #include #include void foo1 () { static char root[2] = {"/"}; std::set> d (&root, &root + 1); bool b = d.find ("/") != d.end (); assert (b); } void foo2 () { stati

[Bug go/86331] the gccgo's "go" tool looks like failing to invoke any sub go command

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86331 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- In general, the value of errno is undefined unless you know the previous system call failed. In this case the SIGCHLD signal handler has modified errno. This has nothing to do with VM or arm64 or whatever.

[Bug go/86331] the gccgo's "go" tool looks like failing to invoke any sub go command

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86331 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- This looks suspicious, why is stat being called with NULL? [pid 30149] newfstatat(AT_FDCWD, NULL, [pid 30149] <... newfstatat resumed> 0xb0119b30, 0) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address)

[Bug c/86340] GCC 8.1 produces broken code for m68k with optimization levels above -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86340 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/84195] newlines in deprecated diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84195 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- There is no conformance bug because the standard does not specify a textual representation of the preprocessor phases. Also, your input is INVALID C anyway.

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- In C mode, with line numbers, the newlines are required to preserve the line number of the tokens.

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- It's not plain C since the stray backslashes are invalid.

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Did you use -xassembler-with-cpp? Without that it's INVALID.

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- I don't see any difference in the preprocessor out with or without -P apart from the line comments.

[Bug bootstrap/85921] /gcc/c-family/c-warn.c fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- (In reply to John Simon from comment #3) > The include chain is: > > # 415 "../../gcc-8.1.0/gcc/system.h" > <-- "/usr/include/signal.h" > <-- "/usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h" > <-- "/usr/include

[Bug c/85874] gcc points to wrong location when displaying error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Does that change if you use -Wsystem-headers?

[Bug libgcc/85869] libgcc fails to build in canadian cross: cet.h not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85869 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- I think your cross compiler needs to be built from the same sources as the canadian cross build.

[Bug middle-end/85811] Invalid optimization with fmax, fabs and nan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85811 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- > Is there sth like -NaN?! signbit can tell you.

[Bug tree-optimization/85725] strchr and strstr of a one-element array with a non-empty string can be assumed to return null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85725 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- The C standard defines a string as "a contiguous sequence of characters terminated by and including the first null character" (7.1.1).

[Bug target/85718] Incorrect name mangling for va_list on mipsel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85718 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- See gcc/config/mips/mips.c:mips_build_builtin_va_list. va_list is a simple void* unless compiling for EABI.

[Bug target/85613] [8/9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85613 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85579] [9 regression] SIGSEV in fortran test case gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 starting with r259754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85579 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/85613] New: [8/9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 -O1 execution test

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: powerpc*-*-* The test crashes at -O1, but not on other opt levels. The offset from

[Bug c++/85569] is_invocable(F, decltype(objs)...) fails with "not supported by dump_expr#" unless via indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 85568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/85568] is_invocable(F, decltype(objs)...) fails with "not supported by dump_expr#" unless via indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85568 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85450] ICE: invalid types in nop conversion during GIMPLE pass: ompexp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85450 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab --- This also breaks building libgcc with -mabi=ilp32, and the patch in #c8 fixes that.

[Bug c++/85348] ostringstream with #pragma pack(1) causes stack smashing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85348 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug c++/84744] cannot use glibc 2.27 with gcc 7.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab --- The glibc headers depend on the kernel UAPI headers, they need to be available in the sysroot.

[Bug tree-optimization/63734] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-v8qi.c -O2 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schw

[Bug tree-optimization/63734] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-v8qi.c -O2 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX

[Bug target/84990] [8 Regression] Boostrap broken with --enable-checking=release and Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84990 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug ada/85010] [8 Regression] gnat bootstrap fails in assemble_variable, at varasm.c:2297 (power*, aarch64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85010 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84990] [8 Regression] Boostrap broken with --enable-checking=release and Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84990 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- And I didn't use --enable-checking=release on aarch64.

[Bug target/84990] [8 Regression] Boostrap broken with --enable-checking=release and Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84990 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-linux, |powerpc64*-*-*, aarch64-*-*

[Bug go/84948] [8 regression] ICE in set_from, at go/gofrontend/types.cc:2660

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84948 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug go/84948] New: [8 regression] ICE in set_from, at go/gofrontend/types.cc:2660

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go Assignee: ian at airs dot com Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: cmang at google dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: m68k-*-* It looks like set_from makes some invalid

[Bug target/84829] -mieee-fp causes to link with -lieee but that is no longer available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- On m68k -mieee-fp is a no-op.

[Bug driver/84731] -Bsymbolic switch ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84731 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84461] [8 regression] openjdk-10 fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84461 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/84568] libstdc++-v3 configure checks for atomic operations fail on riscv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84568 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug libstdc++/84568] New: libstdc++-v3 configure checks for atomic operations fail on riscv

Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: riscv*-*-* checking for atomic builtins for bool... no checking for atomic builtins for short... no checking for

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #16 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 43484 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43484&action=edit libgo support for riscv64 With this patch I can sucessfully build libgo for riscv64.

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab --- See gcc/config/riscv/linux.h for why it does that.

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab --- The first hunk is useless since this is a compile test.

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab --- See comment #0.

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- That does not work because CFLAGS gets reset after the test. Only PTHREAD_CFLAGS survives.

[Bug libffi/84410] libffi doesn't support riscv now, but not disabled in configure.ac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84410 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- The latest commit in is working well.

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- The patch file link.

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- That doesn't work.

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- https://golang.org/cl/95436 doesn't contain any patch.

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- contains a preliminary patch to add support for riscv, you also need

[Bug go/84484] New: libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

Assignee: ian at airs dot com Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: cmang at google dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: riscv*-*-* When building for riscv the compiler wants to link -latomic when building with -pthread, but the configure tests in libgo

[Bug target/84475] pthread doesn't define _REENTRANT in preprocessor on riscv-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84475 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84461] [8 regression] openjdk-10 fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84461 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug c++/84461] [8 regression] openjdk-10 fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84461 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 43467 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43467&action=edit Testcase

[Bug c++/84461] New: [8 regression] openjdk-10 fails to build

++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- In file included from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk10-107413b070b9/src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/adaptiveSizePolicy.hpp:31, from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk10

[Bug debug/84457] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84457 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 84459 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug debug/84459] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84459 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/84457] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84457 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 84458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug debug/84458] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84458 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >