https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64320
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64340
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043#c11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab ---
This breaks ada:
$ gcc/gnatmake --GCC=gcc/xgcc --GNATBIND=gcc/gnatbind --GNATLINK=gcc/gnatlink
-cargs -Bgcc/ -largs '--GCC=gcc/xgcc -Bgcc' -margs
--RTS=ia64-suse-linux/./libada -f ../gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
(a & 0xFF00) >> 8 with short a = 0x8001 evaluates to 0x80, since all operands
are first promoted to int.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64294
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: m68k-*-*
$ gcc/xg++ -B gcc/ -S -O ../gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr60474.C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 64233 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64233
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab ---
In order to be precise trying to open doesnotexist/foo.c should report "no such
directory".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64202
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64202
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64197
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
Dup of PR64192?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64192
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
This is also causing unaligned accesses in the compiler on ia64, for example in
function ipa-inline-analysis.c:account_size_time:
new_entry.predicate = *pred;
struct predicate has only 4 byte alignme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64168
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: m68k-*-*, ia64-*-*
Broken by r218255.
sync.exe:
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20141203/libstdc++-v3/testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
This fixes all yesterday's testsuite regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64159
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc*-*-*
$ grep return ssa-dom-cse-2.c.183t.optimized
return sum_7;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc64-*-*
$ grep "global deletions =" pr44194-1.c.209r.dse1
dse: local deletions = 0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64157
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #24 from Andreas Schwab ---
builtin-arith-overflow-14.c still fails on ppc32 as of r218249.
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: mjambor at suse dot cz
Blocks: 63551
Target: m68k-*-*
Created attachment 34164
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64126
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |
Host|hppa-unknown-linux-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
"No such file or directory" is a familiar, recognizable error message, and is
automatically translated through libc. Is the required complexity for this
special case really worth it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
6 is the output from "cout << os.precision() << endl;", not the value of d.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63946
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63940
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
This looks bogus (from cxx_eval_binary_expression):
if (lhs == orig_lhs && rhs == orig_rhs)
return t;
Just because both operands are self-evaluating doesn't mean we can return the
unfolded expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63918
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
float f = 3.1f;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63853
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab ---
How about using strcspn?
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: jakub at redhat dot com
Target: ia64-*-*
This fails at any opt level. Also failing
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenther at suse dot de
Target: powerpc*-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab ---
Also breaks gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-19.c (both -m32 and -m64).
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-19.c -O3
-fdump-tree-ldist-details -S -m32 -o ldist-19.s && grep -c "generated mems
rsion: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: hubicka at ucw dot cz
Target: powerpc64-*-*
$ gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab ---
This also breaks g++.dg/ipa/pr63587-2.C on powerpc -m32, but the patches in #c6
and #c8 don't fix that.
$ gcc/xg++ -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr63587-2.C -nostdinc++
-Ipowerpc64-linux/32/libstdc++-
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenther at suse dot de
Target: m68k-*-*
$ gcc/gfortran -Bgcc/ -Bm68k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63760
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Why aren't read-only data being placed in progmem by default?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: ia64-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63712
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz,
-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc-*-*
$ ../../../gcc/gccgo -B../../../gcc/ -B/usr/powerpc64-linux/bin/
-B/usr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63712
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab ---
You don't need a link test, you only need to check whether there is a reference
to abort.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63670
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Since C_INCLUDE_PATH defines the path for system headers, this doesn't look
like a bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63666
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenther at suse dot de
Target: ia64-*-*
Broken by r216728.
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr45752
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63645
--- Comment #21 from Andreas Schwab ---
This is only valid if the object is of the union type (union _GnmExpr)
(ยง6.5.2.3#6: "if the union object currently contains one of these structures").
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63647
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63591
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab ---
A function declaration with forward declared parameters it is a prototype, sort
of. Not defining the forward declared parameter as a real parameter should
probably be flagged as an error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63556
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
This is done by the linker, as part of the merge section handling.
Contents of section .rodata:
4005b0 01000200 78616263 00 xabc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63511
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab
lse
[-Werror=strict-overflow]
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: hubi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63463
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: jiong.wang at arm dot com
Target: powerpc-*-*
$ ADA_INCLUDE_PATH=powerpc64-linux/32/libada/adainclude
ADA_OBJECTS_PATH=powerpc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63461
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63436
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63393
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
A conforming implementation is always allowed to provide extensions. The
difference between hosted and freestanding implementations is in the set of
library facilities that are guaranteed to be available, b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63388
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
Please make sure all functions are called exactly as they are defined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
Reduced:
extern void abort (void);
extern void exit (int);
#define TEST_COMPOUND(TYPE, LHSVAL, RHSVAL, OP)\
do\
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
setf.s f6 = r14 vs. setf.sig f6 = r14
setf.d f6 = r14 vs. setf.sig f6 = r14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Created attachment 33537
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33537&action=edit
Assembler output w/ r215449 reverted
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: ia64-*-*
Created attachment 33536
--> ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63312
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
This fixes the test for all opt levels, no regressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60100
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugs at dima dot
secretsauce.ne
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: joseph at codesourcery dot com
Target: ia64-*-*
(gdb) bt
#0 0xa0040721 in __kernel_syscall_via_break ()
#1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63301
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
le" 1
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenther at s
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc64-*-*
Created attachment 33488
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33488&action=edit
Assembler output
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: segher at kernel dot crashing.org
Target: powerpc-*-*
Only happens with -m32.
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/gcc
-fwhole-program
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63212
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63204
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment #
: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenther at suse dot de
Target: m68k-*-*
Appeared with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63195
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
$ ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr --build=powerpc64-linux
--enable-checking=release --enable-shared --with-system-zlib 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g'
'CXXFLAGS=-O2 -g' --with-cpu-64=power4 --enable-secureplt
--with-long-dou
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: segher at kernel dot crashing.org
Target: powerpc64-*-*
r214077 is causing the stage3 build/gengtype to be miscompiled on ppc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62663
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
Then this is most likely a linker bug, not setting up the GOT correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62318
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 62317 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62317
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: ia64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62095
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62068
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab ---
Please reread comment#1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62068
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
varargs isn't stdargs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62068
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
There is no such requirement for va_start/va_end. You are probably thinking of
pthread_cleanup_push/pop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab ---
If you never use goto *exp in the same function the value of &&label is
undefined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61964
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
Equality test against pointer to void is explicitly allowed by the standard and
implicitly converts the other pointer to void*.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61919
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
That fixes the test case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61919
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Created attachment 33188
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33188&action=edit
Output before r213002
-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Blocks: 61268
Target: ia64-*-*
Created attachment 33187
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61812
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61792
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Looks like it doesn't use/prefer the configured ISL headers. Unfortunately you
left out the actual compiler command lines.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757
--- Comment #18 from Andreas Schwab ---
The testsuite failure is now bug 61783.
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenther at suse dot de
Target: m68k-*-*
>From <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab ---
Perhaps the m68k test failure can still provide an easier hint.
801 - 900 of 1457 matches
Mail list logo
