https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544
Bug ID: 111544
Summary: [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after
r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111480
Bug ID: 111480
Summary: new test case g++.target/powerpc/altivec-19.C fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 55926
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55926=edit
preprocessed .ii file
Yup, that looks like the culprit.
Preprocessed file attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465
Bug ID: 111465
Summary: [14 regression] stage 3 ICE kills bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also this one:
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Invalid sum"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
Bug ID: 111462
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails
after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111427
Bug ID: 111427
Summary: [14 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/pr60510.f fails after
r14-3999-g3c834d85f2ec42
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111377
Bug ID: 111377
Summary: [14 regression]
c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-1.c fails
after XXX on big endian
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111329
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is the one that appears to trigger this failure, though. And as for being a
duplicate of that other one I see this on both powerpc64 BE and LE.
git bisect log
git bisect start
# good:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111329
Bug ID: 111329
Summary: [14 regression]
gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-1-debug.c fails
after r14-3745-g4f4fa2501186e4
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111263
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No, that is not failing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111264
Bug ID: 111264
Summary: [14 regression]
gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c breaks after
r14-3580-g597b9ec69bca8a
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111263
Bug ID: 111263
Summary: test case gfortran.dg/ieee/comparisons_3.F90 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111248
Bug ID: 111248
Summary: test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/copy-headers-8.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111228
Bug ID: 111228
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-extract-6.c
fails after r14-3381-g27de9aa152141e
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111216
Bug ID: 111216
Summary: [14 regression] instructions counts for vector tests
change after r14-3258-ge7a36e4715c716
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111215
Bug ID: 111215
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cond-bool-2.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110895
Bug ID: 110895
Summary: [14 regression] ICE compiling
gcc.c-torture/compile/pr33133.c after
r14-2925-g2bae476b511dc4
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110858
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build||powerpc64le-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110863
Bug ID: 110863
Summary: New test case 23_containers/vector/bool/110807.cc from
r14-2797-g7931a1de9ec87b fails on big endian
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110831
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also this one:
FAIL: gcc.dg/strcmpopt_5.c (internal compiler error: in to_gcov_type, at
profile-count.h:831)
FAIL: gcc.dg/strcmpopt_5.c (test for excess errors)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110831
Bug ID: 110831
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/stack-check-3.c ICEs after
r14-2822-g499b8079a6419b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110803
Bug ID: 110803
Summary: new test case gcc.c-torture/execute/pr109986.c in
r14-2751-g2a3556376c69a1 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110771
Bug ID: 110771
Summary: [14 regression] g++.dg/gomp/pr58567.C fails after
r14-2655-g92d1425ca78040
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
Bug ID: 110744
Summary: [14 regression] cc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c fails after
r14-2267-gb8806f6ffbe72
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110740
Bug ID: 110740
Summary: [14 regression]
gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 55563
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55563=edit
All the intermediate files in a .tar.gz
Here are all the files zipped up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
Bug ID: 110669
Summary: [24 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/torture/pr105132.c since
r14-2515-gb77161e60bce7b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-fdump-tree-all-blocks-details produced more than 100 dump files. Which one(s)
do you want?
seurer@ltcden2-lp1:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
Bug ID: 110628
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/update-threading.c
fails after r14-2383-g768f00e3e84123
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110614
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This may be a dupe of PR110616 (or vice-versa).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110616
Bug ID: 110616
Summary: [14 regression] ICE after r14-2117-gdd86a5a69cbda4
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110563
Bug ID: 110563
Summary: [14 regression] Many ICEs after r14-2281
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110544
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I just tried it with current trunk and I no longer see an ICE either.
However...
g:429905d809bbf2398bf666d65322b87ac7381e43, r14-2320-g429905d809bbf2
make -k check-gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110544
Bug ID: 110544
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c ICEs after
r14-2150
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110443
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I just tried r14-2190-ge972bdce61cc52 on another BE machine and got:
spawn [open ...]
by value(kind=1): B
by value(kind=1): A
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110461
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419
Bug ID: 110419
Summary: [14 regression] new test case gfortran.dg/value_9.f90
in r14-2050-gd130ae8499e0c6 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110329
Bug ID: 110329
Summary: [14 regression] build fails building documentation
after r14-1949-g957ae904065917
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110316
Bug ID: 110316
Summary: [14 regression] g++.dg/ext/timevar1.C and timevar2.C
fail erratically
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110239
Bug ID: 110239
Summary: [14 regression] std/format/functions/format.cc fails
after r14-1648-g628ba410b9265d
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110230
Bug ID: 110230
Summary: new test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c in
r14-1705-g2764335bd336f2 fails for 32 bits
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110225
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110225
Bug ID: 110225
Summary: [14 regression] many ICEs after
r14-1624-g28db36e2cfca1b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110198
Bug ID: 110198
Summary: [14 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr100244.C fails after
r14-1632-g9589a46ddadc8b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110178
Bug ID: 110178
Summary: [14 regression] gfortran.dg/gomp/target-update-1.f90
fails after r14-1579-g4ede915d5dde93
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109610
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109971
Bug ID: 109971
Summary: [14 regression] Several powerpc64 vector test cases
fail after r14-1242-gf574e2dfae7905
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109949
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I see the same test failing on trunk and the gcc 12 commit mentions it being a
backport. The test is not in gcc 13 currently.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109949
Bug ID: 109949
Summary: new test case
experimental/simd/pr109261_constexpr_simd.cc in
r12-9647-g3acbaf1b253215 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.4.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109913
Bug ID: 109913
Summary: [14 regression] r14-976-g9907413a3a6aa3 causes more
than 300 objc/objc++ failures
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108321
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 107915 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107915
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108321
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
--- Comment #14 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The failures occur erratically so one clean run doesn't mean much. Scanning
the test results mailing list I see failures for this just today in trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880
Bug ID: 109880
Summary: [14 regression]
gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails
after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109793
Bug ID: 109793
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/pr108950.c from
r11-10752-gd4cbcb9e45c6d4 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109749
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried this on gcc 12 and it did not ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109749
Bug ID: 109749
Summary: new test case g++.dg/vect/pr109573.cc ICEs with checks
turned on
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109656
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
make -k check
RUNTESTFLAGS="conformance.exp=26_numerics/random/random_device/cons/token.cc"
This is from powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++.log
Setting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705
Bug ID: 109705
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c fails after
r14-333-g6d4b59a9356ac4
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109672
Bug ID: 109672
Summary: [143 regression] many ICEs after
r14-323-g977a43f5ba778b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109656
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It failed on just the one power 8 system where it fails every time.
configure --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --enable-secureplt --with-cpu=power8
--disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib
I will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109656
Bug ID: 109656
Summary: [14 regression]
26_numerics/random/random_device/cons/token.cc fails
after r14-289-gf9412cedd6c0e7
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109608
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] net test|[10 regression] net test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109610
Bug ID: 109610
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dform-3.c fails
after
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109608
Bug ID: 109608
Summary: [14 regression] net test case
g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-pmf3.C in
r10-11306-gda17a9049ee0a8 has excess errors
Product: gcc
Version: 10.4.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109589
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've seen some successful builds go by on the old systems. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109589
Bug ID: 109589
Summary: [14 regression] r14-35-g278f8f567b5470 breaks build
with older gcc build compilers
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109572
Bug ID: 109572
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-4.c from
r14-108-g705b0d2b62318b fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109560
Bug ID: 109560
Summary: new test case g++.dg/ext/int128-8.C from
r14-88-ged32ec26697cc7 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109466
Bug ID: 109466
Summary: [13 regression] gfortran.dg/gomp/affinity-clause-1.f90
fails after r13-7120-g46fe32cb4d887d
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109447
Bug ID: 109447
Summary: test case libffi.closures/cls_align_longdouble_split.c
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Alas, yes. This system is quite old and not being updated any more. It
hopefully will be retired soon.
This probably isn't a big deal and as far as I am concerned can be ignored.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The excess error is:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c: In
function 'foo':
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 54684
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54684=edit
Preprocessed file
Attached file from this command
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am updating some tools on the system and will try again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109149
Bug ID: 109149
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/pr108950.c from
r12-9262-gf4e4108dd00508 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
Bug ID: 109145
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c from
r13-6624-geb337d28c32b1b fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109129
Bug ID: 109129
Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-lambda3.C in
unresolved after r13-6594-ga915c29a7d63cc
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108991
Bug ID: 108991
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/memchr-3.c fails after
r13-6414-g62a8d31ecc0704
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108985
Bug ID: 108985
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/pr108950.c from
r13-6384-ge3837b6f6c28a1 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108977
Bug ID: 108977
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr96373.c fails
after r11-10549-gcf3d95cce379f3 on power 10
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108908
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108908
Bug ID: 108908
Summary: [13 regression] r13-6278-g3da77f217c8b20 causes ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106879
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I just tried this and I am still seeing failures albeit only on power 7 BE.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}'
vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-layout-19.c"
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108815
Bug ID: 108815
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/pr83677.c fails on power 9 BE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108814
Bug ID: 108814
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/pr79251-run.p9.c fails on power 9
BE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108813
Bug ID: 108813
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/pr101384-2.c fails on power 9 BE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108812
Bug ID: 108812
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/p9-sign_extend-runnable.c fails on
power 9 BE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108810
Bug ID: 108810
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p9.c fails
on power 9 BE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108809
Bug ID: 108809
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-5-p9-runnable.c fails on
power 9 BE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108807
Bug ID: 108807
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-10d.c
fails after b29225597584b697762585e0b707b7cb4b427650
on power 9 BE
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108776
Bug ID: 108776
Summary: new test case c-c++-common/rotate-11.c from
r12-9158-ga015ebe382cd6d fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108758
Bug ID: 108758
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/float128-cmp2-runnable.c fails with
excess errors on power 9 BE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, in the test run I just did it worked.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108731
Bug ID: 108731
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/vec-test-data-class-9.c fails
on power 9 BE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108730
Bug ID: 108730
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-test-neg-8.c fails on
power 9 BE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108729
Bug ID: 108729
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-test-data-class-12.c
fails on power 9 BE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
101 - 200 of 742 matches
Mail list logo