[Bug target/108728] New: gcc.dg/torture/float128-cmp-invalid.c fails on power 9 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108728 Bug ID: 108728 Summary: gcc.dg/torture/float128-cmp-invalid.c fails on power 9 BE Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/108727] New: gcc.dg/split-5.c fails on power 9 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108727 Bug ID: 108727 Summary: gcc.dg/split-5.c fails on power 9 BE Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug target/108726] New: gcc.dg/analyzer/pipe-glibc.c fails on power 9 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108726 Bug ID: 108726 Summary: gcc.dg/analyzer/pipe-glibc.c fails on power 9 BE Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/108722] New: gcc.dg/analyzer/file-CWE-1341-example.c fails on power 9 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108722 Bug ID: 108722 Summary: gcc.dg/analyzer/file-CWE-1341-example.c fails on power 9 BE Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/108699] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c fails on power 9 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108699 Bug ID: 108699 Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c fails on power 9 BE Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/108609] New test case gfortran.dg/pr108527.f90 in r13-5479-g22afa4947584c7 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108609 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried the patch and it seems to work fine. make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/pr108527.f90" # of expected passes3

[Bug fortran/108609] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr108527.f90 in r13-5479-g22afa4947584c7 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108609 Bug ID: 108609 Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/pr108527.f90 in r13-5479-g22afa4947584c7 ICEs Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/108604] New: New test case gcc.dg/torture/pr108574-3.c in r13-5492-g7ac3e69e311351 hangs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108604 Bug ID: 108604 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/torture/pr108574-3.c in r13-5492-g7ac3e69e311351 hangs Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/108519] [13 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr105586.c fails after r13-5154-g733a1b777f16cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108519 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried to test that patch but it didn't apply cleanly.

[Bug other/108549] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pr107554.c fails for 32 bits after r12-9062-gca8b8191983d1a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108549 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am also seeing the same error with gcc 11. r11-10483-g23a9270c999a24

[Bug other/108549] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/pr107554.c fails for 32 bits after r12-9062-gca8b8191983d1a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108549 Bug ID: 108549 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/pr107554.c fails for 32 bits after r12-9062-gca8b8191983d1a Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/108533] New: [13 regression] new test g++.dg/init/new51.C in r13-5318-g049a5290907511 fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108533 Bug ID: 108533 Summary: [13 regression] new test g++.dg/init/new51.C in r13-5318-g049a5290907511 fails for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/108530] [13 regression] std/time/tzdb/1.cc fails after r13-5168-g559993b85744ae

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108530 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes it is a regular file. With the previous commit it wasn't UNSUPPORTED and worked just fine: g:ff6c7617102df365918402c6ccc8e497c47dbe60, r13-5167-gff6c7617102df3 make -k check

[Bug libstdc++/108530] New: [13 regression] std/time/tzdb/1.cc fails after r13-5168-g559993b85744ae

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108530 Bug ID: 108530 Summary: [13 regression] std/time/tzdb/1.cc fails after r13-5168-g559993b85744ae Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/108519] New: [13 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr105586.c fails after r13-5154-g733a1b777f16cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108519 Bug ID: 108519 Summary: [13 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr105586.c fails after r13-5154-g733a1b777f16cd Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/108507] New: [13 regression] new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/SARD-tc841-basic-00182-min.c in r13-5244-gc6a011119bfa03 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108507 Bug ID: 108507 Summary: [13 regression] new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/SARD-tc841-basic-00182-min.c in r13-5244-gc6a09bfa03 fails Product: gcc Version: 13.0

[Bug c++/108321] New: [13 regression] g++.dg/contracts/contracts-tmpl-spec2.C fails after r13-4160-g2efb237ffc68ec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108321 Bug ID: 108321 Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/contracts/contracts-tmpl-spec2.C fails after r13-4160-g2efb237ffc68ec Product: gcc Version: 13.0

[Bug testsuite/108280] [10 regression] Many lto excess errors after r10-11132-gf543f71c54be74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108280 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It looks like the same thing happened to gcc 11. Should I open another PR for that?

[Bug lto/108280] New: [10 regression] Many lto excess errors after r10-11132-gf543f71c54be74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108280 Bug ID: 108280 Summary: [10 regression] Many lto excess errors after r10-11132-gf543f71c54be74 Product: gcc Version: 10.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/107979] [13 regression] r13-4391-g0ded30b361d2b1 causes excess errors in 17_intro/names.cc on big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107979 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- These systems are pretty old. So, just ignore it?

[Bug libstdc++/107979] [13 regression] r13-4391-g0ded30b361d2b1 causes excess errors in 17_intro/names.cc on big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107979 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Oh, also these: FAIL: experimental/names.cc (test for excess errors) FAIL: experimental/names.cc (test for excess errors)

[Bug libstdc++/107979] New: [13 regression] r13-4391-g0ded30b361d2b1 causes excess errors in 17_intro/names.cc on big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107979 Bug ID: 107979 Summary: [13 regression] r13-4391-g0ded30b361d2b1 causes excess errors in 17_intro/names.cc on big endian Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/107915] New: new test case g++.dg/contracts/contracts-tmpl-spec2.C in r13-4160-g2efb237ffc68ec fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107915 Bug ID: 107915 Summary: new test case g++.dg/contracts/contracts-tmpl-spec2.C in r13-4160-g2efb237ffc68ec fails Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/107903] New: new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/file-CWE-1341-example.c in r13-4218-g9ada45967b4cf5 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107903 Bug ID: 107903 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/file-CWE-1341-example.c in r13-4218-g9ada45967b4cf5 has excess errors Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/107720] New: [13 regression] New C++ library test cases (and many others) in r13-3936-g1d9454aba615ea fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107720 Bug ID: 107720 Summary: [13 regression] New C++ library test cases (and many others) in r13-3936-g1d9454aba615ea fail Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/107692] New: [13 regression] r13-3950-g071e428c24ee8c breaks many test cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107692 Bug ID: 107692 Summary: [13 regression] r13-3950-g071e428c24ee8c breaks many test cases Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/107689] New: [13 regression] r13-3979-g9d29dd2fcf2922 causes failures in diagnostic-format-json-2.c and others

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107689 Bug ID: 107689 Summary: [13 regression] r13-3979-g9d29dd2fcf2922 causes failures in diagnostic-format-json-2.c and others Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/107669] [13 Regression] commit r13-3931-59a63247992eb13153b82c4902aadf111460eac2 causes lots of testcase failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107669 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/107665] New: [13 regression] g++.dg/cpp23/ext-floating1.C fails after r13-3387-g79d38dd46e6b07

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107665 Bug ID: 107665 Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/cpp23/ext-floating1.C fails after r13-3387-g79d38dd46e6b07 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/103755] {has,use}_facet() and iostream constructor performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103755 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/107599] New: [13 regression] c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-json-4.c fails after r13-3853-g9c3bc557995463

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107599 Bug ID: 107599 Summary: [13 regression] c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-json-4.c fails after r13-3853-g9c3bc557995463 Product: gcc Version: 13.0

[Bug other/107578] New: [13 regression] r13-3761-ga239a63f868e29 causes excess errors for g++.dg/pr71488.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107578 Bug ID: 107578 Summary: [13 regression] r13-3761-ga239a63f868e29 causes excess errors for g++.dg/pr71488.C Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/107562] New: [13 regression] r13-3761-ga239a63f868e29 breaks build on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107562 Bug ID: 107562 Summary: [13 regression] r13-3761-ga239a63f868e29 breaks build on powerpc64 BE Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/107497] [13 regression] ICE during bootstrap after r13-3595-g7b1cdca6d6d594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107497 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch works for powerpc64. Thanks!

[Bug tree-optimization/107497] [13 regression] ICE during bootstrap after r13-3595-g7b1cdca6d6d594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107497 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Because of past issues I always use contrib/download_prerequisites

[Bug tree-optimization/107497] New: [13 regression] ICE during bootstrap after r13-3595-g7b1cdca6d6d594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107497 Bug ID: 107497 Summary: [13 regression] ICE during bootstrap after r13-3595-g7b1cdca6d6d594 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/107453] New: New stdarg tests in r13-3549-g4fe34cdcc80ac2 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107453 Bug ID: 107453 Summary: New stdarg tests in r13-3549-g4fe34cdcc80ac2 fail Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/106806] [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c fails after r13-2333-gca8f4e8af14869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106806 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc64le-linux-gnu

[Bug testsuite/107073] New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c from r13-2333-gca8f4e8af14869 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107073 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug testsuite/106806] [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c fails after r13-2333-gca8f4e8af14869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106806 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 107073 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug testsuite/107073] New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c from r13-2333-gca8f4e8af14869 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107073 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug testsuite/107446] New test case gcc.dg/analyzer/pipe-glibc.c in r13-3466-g792f039fc37faa has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107446 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry, I must have bisected it on multiple systems.

[Bug testsuite/107446] New: New test case gcc.dg/analyzer/pipe-glibc.c in r13-3466-g792f039fc37faa has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107446 Bug ID: 107446 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/analyzer/pipe-glibc.c in r13-3466-g792f039fc37faa has excess errors Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98645] [modules] does not work on PowerPC with IEEE 128-bit long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98645 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here is the list of the current failures for trunk (they all fail with gcc 12 too). I did not include the xtreme-header ones as those are flakey and fail elsewhere, too (there are several PRs

[Bug bootstrap/107299] [13 regression] ICE in stage 1 after r13-3307-g8efc38347a7444

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 107420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/107420] [13 regression] ICE when building trunk with ieee128 after r13-3307-g8efc38347a7444

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107420 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/107420] New: [13 regression] ICE when building trunk with ieee128 after r13-3307-g8efc38347a7444

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107420 Bug ID: 107420 Summary: [13 regression] ICE when building trunk with ieee128 after r13-3307-g8efc38347a7444 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/107396] New: [12 regression] new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/pipe-glibc.c in r13-3466-g792f039fc37faa fails with excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107396 Bug ID: 107396 Summary: [12 regression] new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/pipe-glibc.c in r13-3466-g792f039fc37faa fails with excess errors Product: gcc Version:

[Bug other/107379] New: [13 regression] g++.dg/modules/adl-3_c.C and adl-4_b.C break as of r13-2887-gb04208895fed34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107379 Bug ID: 107379 Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/modules/adl-3_c.C and adl-4_b.C break as of r13-2887-gb04208895fed34 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/107353] New: [13 regression] Numerous ICEs after 13-3416-g1d561e1851c466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353 Bug ID: 107353 Summary: [13 regression] Numerous ICEs after 13-3416-g1d561e1851c466 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/107353] [13 regression] Numerous ICEs after 13-3416-g1d561e1851c466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Build||powerpc64le-linux-gnu

[Bug other/107338] New: new test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-7.c in r13-3413-ge10ca9544632db fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107338 Bug ID: 107338 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-7.c in r13-3413-ge10ca9544632db fails Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/107311] New: New test case gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107311 Bug ID: 107311 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c fails Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug other/107299] New: [13 regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299 Bug ID: 107299 Summary: [13 regression] Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee:

[Bug testsuite/107240] New: [13 regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240 Bug ID: 107240 Summary: [13 regression] Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee:

[Bug testsuite/107220] New: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-19.c fails after r13-3212-gb88adba751da63

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107220 Bug ID: 107220 Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-19.c fails after r13-3212-gb88adba751da63 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/107213] New: New test case c-c++-common/pointer-to-fn1.c uses unsupported option r13-3202-g67efffec943656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107213 Bug ID: 107213 Summary: New test case c-c++-common/pointer-to-fn1.c uses unsupported option r13-3202-g67efffec943656 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I added that option and 554.roms_r now runs OK.

[Bug testsuite/107181] new test case gcc.dg/pr25521.c fails in r13-2952-ga0aafbc324aa90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc64-linux-gnu

[Bug testsuite/107181] New: new test case gcc.dg/pr25521.c fails in r13-2952-ga0aafbc324aa90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181 Bug ID: 107181 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/pr25521.c fails in r13-2952-ga0aafbc324aa90 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note that 554.roms_r from spec2017 also fails after this commit.

[Bug testsuite/107171] New: New test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr105586.c fails after its introduction in r13-2525-gbec35caafae8db

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107171 Bug ID: 107171 Summary: New test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr105586.c fails after its introduction in r13-2525-gbec35caafae8db Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status:

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- One of the compilation commands: /home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/bin/g++ -c -o auto_derivative_function.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -Iinclude -DBOOST_DISABLE_THREADS -Ddeal_II_dimension=3 -m64

[Bug target/107160] New: [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 Bug ID: 107160 Summary: [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/107059] [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059 --- Comment #30 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Any more progress on this? Builds still fail on powerpc64 LE.

[Bug other/107098] [13 regression] failure in 453.povray after r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107098 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13 regression] failure in |[13 regression] failure in

[Bug other/107098] New: [13 regression] failure in 453.povray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107098 Bug ID: 107098 Summary: [13 regression] failure in 453.povray Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug testsuite/107073] New: New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107073 Bug ID: 107073 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c fails Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/107062] [13 regression] gfortran.dg/ieee/fma_1.f90 fails after r13-2577-g7c4c65d11469d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107062 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- With that patch the test case passes.

[Bug fortran/107062] [13 regression] gfortran.dg/ieee/fma_1.f90 fails after r13-2577-g7c4c65d11469d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107062 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- seurer@rain6p1:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ cat a.f90 use ieee_arithmetic integer, parameter :: k1 = & max(ieee_selected_real_kind(precision(0.d0) + 1), kind(0.)) integer, parameter :: k2

[Bug fortran/107062] New: [13 regression] gfortran.dg/ieee/fma_1.f90 fails after r13-2577-g7c4c65d11469d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107062 Bug ID: 107062 Summary: [13 regression] gfortran.dg/ieee/fma_1.f90 fails after r13-2577-g7c4c65d11469d2 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/107059] [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059 --- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- No special env vars for anything on that system. With verbose: seurer@perkins:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++$ /bin/bash ../libtool --tag CXX

[Bug bootstrap/107059] [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The errors are all still as shown above in the same files.

[Bug bootstrap/107059] [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Oops, I cut too much from my previous comment: Applying glibc_cxx_floatn_1 to powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/floatn-common.h Applying glibc_cxx_floatn_2 to

[Bug bootstrap/107059] [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It still fails for me (r13-2903-ge73d9fcafbd07b). It looks like fixincludes ran: make . . . Fixing directory /usr/include into /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/include-fixed Applying

[Bug bootstrap/107059] New: [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059 Bug ID: 107059 Summary: [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgomp/106894] New: [13 regression] multiple libgomp failures after r13-2545-g9f2fca56593a2b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106894 Bug ID: 106894 Summary: [13 regression] multiple libgomp failures after r13-2545-g9f2fca56593a2b Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/106879] New: [13 regression] new test case gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-layout-19.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106879 Bug ID: 106879 Summary: [13 regression] new test case gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-layout-19.c fails Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/106872] New: [13 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-12.c fails after r13-2500-g0a4a2667dc115c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106872 Bug ID: 106872 Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-12.c fails after r13-2500-g0a4a2667dc115c Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/106814] [13 regression] r13-2266-g8bb1df032cc080 breaks some mpfr tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106814 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried dae8b9e2bbb6017bf90d68c7b720c500125c8295, r13-2390-gdae8b9e2bbb601 and I am still seeing the failures.

[Bug other/106814] [13 regression] r13-2266-g8bb1df032cc080 breaks some mpfr tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106814 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I used download_prerequistes before the build. seurer@rain6p1:~/gcc/git/gcc-test$ ./contrib/download_prerequisites --force 2022-09-02 09:12:04

[Bug other/106814] [13 regression] r13-2266-g8bb1df032cc080 breaks some mpfr tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106814 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry, that's make check-mpfr

[Bug other/106814] [13 regression] r13-2266-g8bb1df032cc080 breaks some mpfr tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106814 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Do a bootstrap build then make checkmpfr

[Bug other/106814] New: [13 regression] r13-2266-g8bb1df032cc080 breaks some mpfr tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106814 Bug ID: 106814 Summary: [13 regression] r13-2266-g8bb1df032cc080 breaks some mpfr tests Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/106806] New: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c fails after r13-2333-gca8f4e8af14869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106806 Bug ID: 106806 Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-34.c fails after r13-2333-gca8f4e8af14869 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/106796] New: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c fails after r13-2098-g5adfb6540db95d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106796 Bug ID: 106796 Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c fails after r13-2098-g5adfb6540db95d Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/106795] New: [13 regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/empty-loop.C fails with excess errors after r13-2303-gb911ca4231a366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106795 Bug ID: 106795 Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/empty-loop.C fails with excess errors after r13-2303-gb911ca4231a366 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/106761] New: [13 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-*_b.C test cases fails after r13-2158-g02f6b405f0e9dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106761 Bug ID: 106761 Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-*_b.C test cases fails after r13-2158-g02f6b405f0e9dc Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/106735] tens of thousands of errors in C++ library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106735 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It it causing so many error messages that emails to the gcc test results list from my autotesters are being rejected as they are 3.9MB in size.

[Bug libstdc++/106735] New: tens of thousands of errors in C++ library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106735 Bug ID: 106735 Summary: tens of thousands of errors in C++ library Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/106679] New: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c fails after r13-2098-g5adfb6540db95d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106679 Bug ID: 106679 Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c fails after r13-2098-g5adfb6540db95d Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/106579] New: ieee_signaling_nan problem in fortran on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106579 Bug ID: 106579 Summary: ieee_signaling_nan problem in fortran on powerpc64 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/106575] New: new test case gcc.dg/fold-eqandshift-4.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106575 Bug ID: 106575 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/fold-eqandshift-4.c fails Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/106561] New: gfortran.dg/ieee/signaling_1.f90 fails with --with-long-double-format=ieee

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106561 Bug ID: 106561 Summary: gfortran.dg/ieee/signaling_1.f90 fails with --with-long-double-format=ieee Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/106519] [13 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimple_phi_arg, at gimple.h:4594 by r13-1950

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106519 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/104992] [missed optimization] x / y * y == x not optimized to x % y == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104992 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/106516] New test case gcc.dg/pr104992.c fails on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106516 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/106516] New: New test case gcc.dg/pr104992.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106516 Bug ID: 106516 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/pr104992.c fails Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug testsuite/106515] New: [13 regression] gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-int-1.c fails after r13-1937-g5df04a7aa837a1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106515 Bug ID: 106515 Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-int-1.c fails after r13-1937-g5df04a7aa837a1 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/106079] [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after r12-6498-g07c60b8e33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The fix worked fine in my testing on trunk. Thanks!

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >