https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch causes a bunch of new failures:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c-interop/allocatable-dummy.f90 -Os execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c-interop/allocate-errors.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried the patch on trunk and it fixed the failure. I am trying a full make
check there and with gcc 12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106451
Bug ID: 106451
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/pr56837.c fails after
r13-1762-gf9d4c3b45c5ed5
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106396
Bug ID: 106396
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.dg/pr23911.c fails after
r13-1762-gf9d4c3b45c5ed5
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106387
Bug ID: 106387
Summary: [13 regression] ICE when building gcc after
r13-1764-g5f59d0f2d9fa92
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 105837 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105837
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106360
Bug ID: 106360
Summary: [13 regression] ICE in many test cases after
r13-1745-g4c323130257744
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106237
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c was actually reported in PR105267.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100400
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106262
Bug ID: 106262
Summary: [13 regression] test case g++.dg/modules/loc-prune-4.C
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106237
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
They use whichever mcpu matches the machine.
The ICEs are fixed but there is a different problem introduced with your fix
g:79f18ac6b7ab7744fcf8937ea4bc0c40f3efc629, r13-1599-g79f18ac6b7ab77
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106237
Bug ID: 106237
Summary: [13 regression] serveral tests begin ICEing starting
with r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228
--- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There are some test cases that started ICEing with r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946
which fail at the same place in tree-vectorizer.cc:1032. These fail on LE on
power 8/9/10.
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228
--- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The configure options may be making a difference. Here are the ones I was
using: --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --with-cpu=power7 --disable-bootstrap
--enable-multilib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228
--- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is still failing though it looks like at a slightly different point:
libtool: compile: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228
Bug ID: 106228
Summary: [12 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes
bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106219
--- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note: The fix did not take care of the problem on power 7 but it does trace to
the same commit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106219
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106227
Bug ID: 106227
Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/modules/loc-prune-4.C fails
after r13-1506-g069f46c71e9432
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106216
Bug ID: 106216
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/alias-access-path-13.c
fails for 32 bits
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106149
Bug ID: 106149
Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C had
bogus errors after r13-1366-g1eef21ccfa5988
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am not sure. This only happens for 32 bit runs on power. 64 bit ones work
fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120
Bug ID: 106120
Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C
fails since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106105
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106105
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The last round of tests I ran still showed this failing but I will check with
the latest commit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106105
Bug ID: 106105
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/torture/pr106070.c in
r13-1243-gb36a1c964f9975 fails for 32 bits
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106083
Bug ID: 106083
Summary: gfortran.dg/ieee/large_1.f90 fails on powerpc64 with
ieee longlongs
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079
Bug ID: 106079
Summary: [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after
gcc-12-6498-g07c60b8e33
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106059
Bug ID: 106059
Summary: [13 regression] cc.dg/vect/pr79347.c fails after
r13-1171-g9f55aee9dca759
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106034
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There are some more errors further along in the test case that appear related:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-ieee-bootstrap/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106034
Bug ID: 106034
Summary: internal compiler error: in type_node, at
cp/module.cc:8736 using --with-long-double-format=ieee
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
Bug ID: 105959
Summary: new test case
c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-4.c from
r13-967-g6cf276ddf22066 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105837
Bug ID: 105837
Summary: New test c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-4.c
in r13-967-g6cf276ddf22066 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And it was that revision, too.
seurer@muskie:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ whichgcc
Now at commit 1ad584d538d349db13cfa8440222d91d5e9aff3f, r13-859-g1ad584d538d349
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes it is:
seurer@muskie:~/gcc/cpu2017/benchspec/CPU/510.parest_r/build/build_peak_none.0002$
whichgcc
Now at commit ff91735a5b861dd6eaf2c1e511f26a9255898e7d, r13-860-gff91735a5b861d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With a bit of hacking with a chainsaw I got it to this:
#include
#include
class SparsityPattern
{
public:
};
template
class BlockSparsityPatternBase// : public Subscriptor
{
};
class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105803
Bug ID: 105803
Summary: [13 regression] ICE at gcc/cp/pt.cc:27737 after
r13-860-gff91735a5b861d
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105722
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I do not see it in my gcc 11 test runs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105266
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105722
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, it used to work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105724
Bug ID: 105724
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr105140.c fails after
r11-10012-g740d64815c6c8a
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105722
Bug ID: 105722
Summary: [10 regression] std/ranges/adaptors/elements.cc fails
after r10-10724-g93ec7bf2253061
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105706
Bug ID: 105706
Summary: [13 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr78604.c fails
after r13-707-g68e0063397ba82
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105647
Bug ID: 105647
Summary: New test g++.dg/modules/pr105169 from
r13-566-g7a3f38a966a528 fails with assembler error
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105620
Bug ID: 105620
Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/tsan/pr88018.C fails after
r13-456-geccbd7fcee5bbf
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105570
Bug ID: 105570
Summary: new test case gfortran.dg/pr102860.f90 uses invalid
option
Product: gcc
Version: 9.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105566
Bug ID: 105566
Summary: new test case ICEs
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105498
Bug ID: 105498
Summary: new test case
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wconversion-1.c from
r13-122-g1cd3faf5dddb3c has unexpected errors
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105486
Bug ID: 105486
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr104240.c from
r13-89-gb3e98eb3396e16 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
configure was:
configure --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --with-cpu=power10
--enable-bootstrap
though note it also failed for power9, power8, and power7 and on both LE and
BE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 52909
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52909=edit
atan.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
Bug ID: 105432
Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap build error in mpc in stage2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105427
Bug ID: 105427
Summary: [12 regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105349
--- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is still failing with latest trunk:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105349
Bug ID: 105349
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c fails
after r12-8221
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105313
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu |powerpc64-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105313
Bug ID: 105313
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c fails
after r12-8128-g6b7cc7294770ec
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
--- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
These failures are still occurring. The revision change doesn't appear to have
anything to do with it given it was the "daily bump".
Regressions on 11 (power8) on update from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105267
Bug ID: 105267
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c fails
after r12-8128-g6b7cc7294770ec
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105266
Bug ID: 105266
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/pr105250.c fails in
r12-8134-g4e892de6774f86
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105218
Bug ID: 105218
Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap build error in mpc in stage3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105196
Bug ID: 105196
Summary: [12 regression]
gcc.dg/vect/complex/fast-math-complex-add-pattern-floa
t.c fails after r12-8044-gfdd81afcf18d1a
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, there were still failures in the latest test runs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105183
Bug ID: 105183
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/ipa/remref-7.c fails with -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105147
Bug ID: 105147
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/pr105140.c introduced in
r12-7979-geaaf77dd85c333 has excess errors
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105114
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105114
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The makefiles between systems were the same.
One thing that is different is make itself. On another system where this was
working make was a later release. So I grabbed the latest release of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105114
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I did look at the Makefile and didn't see anything that jumped out as weird. I
will try comparing it to one that works.
Those files all exist.
-rwxr-xr-x 1 seurer users 2954 Mar 30 10:16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105114
Bug ID: 105114
Summary: [12 regression] contrib/gcc_update hangs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105085
Bug ID: 105085
Summary: Excess errors from new test case
gcc.dg/analyzer/untracked-1.c in
r12-7809-g5f6197d7c197f9
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105028
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks, that patch really improved things!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105028
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for looking at this. It has been bugging me at a low level for months.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105028
Bug ID: 105028
Summary: gcc.dg/long_branch.c compilation time increases by 10x
on BE system after r11-5648
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105023
Bug ID: 105023
Summary: new test case g++.dg/other/pr104989.C ICEs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105003
Bug ID: 105003
Summary: ICE in new test case from r12-7710-gc7a6a32739d62d
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105002
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||powerpc64le-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105002
Bug ID: 105002
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/float128-minmax-3.c
fails starting with r12-7687-g3a7ba8fd0cda38
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104960
Bug ID: 104960
Summary: [12 regression] several test cases fail after
r12-7670-gf6fb661ea8ac7e
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104335
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104885
Bug ID: 104885
Summary: ICE in compiling new test case g++.dg/other/pr84964.C
after r12-7607-ga717376e99fb33
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104859
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
stage 1. It happens on a non-bootstrap, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104859
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like this is BE only. And the bisect points here:
commit e32869a17b788bee9ca782b174a546b1db17b5ea
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Wed Mar 9 08:42:32 2022 -0500
c++: detecting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104859
Bug ID: 104859
Summary: [12 regression] liibg++ fails during bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104791
Bug ID: 104791
Summary: [12 regression]
libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-
decompose-1.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104694
Bug ID: 104694
Summary: New test case g++.dg/pr104540.C has excess errors
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104599
Bug ID: 104599
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/deprecated.c has excess errors
after r12-7287-g1b71bc7c8b18bd
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104598
Bug ID: 104598
Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/ext/undef-bool-1.C has excess
errors after r12-7284-gefbb17db52afd8
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104586
Bug ID: 104586
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/pr102798.c in
523f5950c70d65714bedf9d5fe164d9e6d69dd87 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103628
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There isn't a check_mod.f90 but there is a check_mod.F90 (Linux is case
sensitive) and using that I was able to reproduce.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103628
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104562
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104562
Bug ID: 104562
Summary: [12 regression] gfortran.dg/gomp/depend-5.f90 fails
after r12-7242-g3939c1b11279dc
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104335
Bug ID: 104335
Summary: [12 regression] build failure if go is included in
languages after r12-6747
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104249
Bug ID: 104249
Summary: [12 regression] RTL failure with checks turned on
after r12-6848
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104214
Bug ID: 104214
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr81196.c fails after
r12-6844
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104206
Bug ID: 104206
Summary: [12 regression] test case c-c++-common/pr72747-2.c
fails in r12-6821
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104150
Bug ID: 104150
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/analyzer/pr104089.c fails after
its introduction in r12-6700
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104103
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also,
g:9d6a0f388eb048f8d87f47af78f07b5ce513bfe6, r12-6606
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg-torture.exp=gcc.dg/torture/pr57147-2.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr57147-2.c -O2 -flto
301 - 400 of 742 matches
Mail list logo
