[Bug analyzer/101980] New: [12 regressions] many test case failures after r12-3002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101980 Bug ID: 101980 Summary: [12 regressions] many test case failures after r12-3002 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101969] [10 regression] reactivated test case gcc.dg/pr78213.c in r12-10042 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101969 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12 regression] reactivated |[10 regression] reactivated

[Bug testsuite/101969] New: [12 regression] reactivated test case gcc.dg/pr78213.c in r12-10042 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101969 Bug ID: 101969 Summary: [12 regression] reactivated test case gcc.dg/pr78213.c in r12-10042 fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/101963] New: New test case gfortran.dg/nothing-1.f90 in r12-2992 doesn't compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101963 Bug ID: 101963 Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/nothing-1.f90 in r12-2992 doesn't compile Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101902] New: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/uninit-1.C has excess errors after r12-2898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101902 Bug ID: 101902 Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/uninit-1.C has excess errors after r12-2898 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/101853] [12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-5_b.C ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101853 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/101866] New: libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/random/randint.cc fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866 Bug ID: 101866 Summary: libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/random/randint.cc fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101847] New: [12 regression] linker errors after r12-2808

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101847 Bug ID: 101847 Summary: [12 regression] linker errors after r12-2808 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/101782] New: [12 regression] Excess errors in g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C after r12-2729

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101782 Bug ID: 101782 Summary: [12 regression] Excess errors in g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C after r12-2729 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/101694] New: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails after r12-2591 for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101694 Bug ID: 101694 Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails after r12-2591 for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/101678] New: [12 regression] many fortran errors afterr r12-2553

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Bug ID: 101678 Summary: [12 regression] many fortran errors afterr r12-2553 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/101654] New: [12 regression] new test case UNRESOLVED problem in r12-2524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101654 Bug ID: 101654 Summary: [12 regression] new test case UNRESOLVED problem in r12-2524 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101647] New: [12 regression] excess error in g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist48.C after r12-2534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101647 Bug ID: 101647 Summary: [12 regression] excess error in g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist48.C after r12-2534 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/101646] New: [12 regression] excess errors after r12-2533

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101646 Bug ID: 101646 Summary: [12 regression] excess errors after r12-2533 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/101568] New: [12 regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr82352.C fails after r12-2338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101568 Bug ID: 101568 Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr82352.C fails after r12-2338 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101531] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr101129.c has excess errors after r11-8780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531 Bug ID: 101531 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr101129.c has excess errors after r11-8780 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/101528] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 Bug ID: 101528 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status:

[Bug other/101520] New: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr93658.c has excess errors after r12-2338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101520 Bug ID: 101520 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr93658.c has excess errors after r12-2338 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/101461] New: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-load-builtin_vec_xl test cases fail after r12-2266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101461 Bug ID: 101461 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-load-builtin_vec_xl test cases fail after r12-2266 Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug middle-end/101457] New: [12 regression] new test cases in r12-2300 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101457 Bug ID: 101457 Summary: [12 regression] new test cases in r12-2300 fail Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/101444] New: [12 regression] cc.target/powerpc/pr86731-fwrapv-longlong.c fails after r12-2266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101444 Bug ID: 101444 Summary: [12 regression] cc.target/powerpc/pr86731-fwrapv-longlong.c fails after r12-2266 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status:

[Bug other/101381] New: [12 regression] missing warning in g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-20.C after r12-2132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101381 Bug ID: 101381 Summary: [12 regression] missing warning in g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-20.C after r12-2132 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/101269] New: new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c fails with its introduction in r12-1852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101269 Bug ID: 101269 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c fails with its introduction in r12-1852 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/101216] New: [12 regression] setjmp/longjmp excess errors after r12-1805

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101216 Bug ID: 101216 Summary: [12 regression] setjmp/longjmp excess errors after r12-1805 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I just tried with current trunk: g:e0672017370b9a9362fda52ecffe33d1c9c41829, r12-1813 make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90" FAIL: gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90

[Bug testsuite/101114] new test case libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c fails after its introduction in r12-1565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101114 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- To be complete this shows up as two failures: FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c execution test

[Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 101201 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug other/101201] [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c fails on BE after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101201 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/101201] New: [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c fails on BE after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101201 Bug ID: 101201 Summary: [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c fails on BE after r12-1202 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/101169] New: [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c fails after r10-9880

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101169 Bug ID: 101169 Summary: [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c fails after r10-9880 Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, there is another similar error compiling a different test case traced to the same revision. And these are occurring on more than just power 10s. Executing on host:

[Bug other/101157] New: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 Bug ID: 101157 Summary: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/101153] New: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/float128-minmax.c fails after r12-1605

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101153 Bug ID: 101153 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/float128-minmax.c fails after r12-1605 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/101122] ice in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101122 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/101114] New: new test case libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c fails after its introduction in r12-1565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101114 Bug ID: 101114 Summary: new test case libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c fails after its introduction in r12-1565 Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug tree-optimization/101112] New: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101112 Bug ID: 101112 Summary: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1551 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/101110] New: [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110 Bug ID: 101110 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101104] New: test case g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104 Bug ID: 101104 Summary: test case g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug analyzer/101082] new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c from r12-1303 fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101082 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ah, crud. I picked the wrong test case to look at. If I'd searched on gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c I would have seen that other PR.

[Bug analyzer/101082] New: new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c from r12-1303 fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101082 Bug ID: 101082 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c from r12-1303 fails on BE Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101020] New: [12 regression] Several test case failures after r12-1316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101020 Bug ID: 101020 Summary: [12 regression] Several test case failures after r12-1316 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/101005] New: [12 regression] bootstrap failure after r12-1342

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101005 Bug ID: 101005 Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap failure after r12-1342 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/101003] New: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1329

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101003 Bug ID: 101003 Summary: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1329 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also, this test FAIL: gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90 -O0 execution test only fails on power 10.

[Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 Bug ID: 100952 Summary: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100943] New: [12 regression] new test gcc.dg/pr100887.c in r12-1256 fails with excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100943 Bug ID: 100943 Summary: [12 regression] new test gcc.dg/pr100887.c in r12-1256 fails with excess errors Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100820] [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100820 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 50922 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50922=edit assembler file

[Bug testsuite/100749] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It does not fail on LE.

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I got it to fail on the gcc110 gcc farm machine. g:659cc7d6320aae7ab390b5886f0efed22f78e244, r12-1164 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}'

[Bug bootstrap/100820] New: [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100820 Bug ID: 100820 Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100750] new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100750 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- There are also some failures with gcc 11 including on power 10 LE. FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rop-3.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c (test for excess errors) FAIL:

[Bug other/100759] [12 regression] ICE for g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C after r12-1039 at gcc/options-save.c:13626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100759 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- actually, there are a bunch of failures from this revision: FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C -Os (internal compiler error) FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C -Os (internal compiler error) FAIL:

[Bug other/100759] New: [12 regression] ICE for g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C after r12-1039 at gcc/options-save.c:13626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100759 Bug ID: 100759 Summary: [12 regression] ICE for g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C after r12-1039 at gcc/options-save.c:13626 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/100750] New: new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100750 Bug ID: 100750 Summary: new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/100748] [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I do see it failing on at least one powerpc64 LE machine. PR97944 said it used to fail randomly.

[Bug testsuite/100749] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 Bug ID: 100749 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100748] New: [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 Bug ID: 100748 Summary: [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100569] [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, there were a LOT of new warnings and such: previous run: g:227a2ecf663d69972b851f51f1934d18927b62cd, r12-741: 52 failures this run: g:7d7d925d0d799eb9dda4a6bd6162af0a7db9c98b, r12-742:

[Bug testsuite/100569] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569 Bug ID: 100569 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/100568] New: [12 regression] ICE at gcc/tree-ssa.c:1214 after r12-657

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100568 Bug ID: 100568 Summary: [12 regression] ICE at gcc/tree-ssa.c:1214 after r12-657 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/100514] New: [12 regression] Error in Ada build in bootstrap after r12-648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100514 Bug ID: 100514 Summary: [12 regression] Error in Ada build in bootstrap after r12-648 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100484] New: [12 regression] Test case gcc.dg/sso-9.c fails after r12-622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100484 Bug ID: 100484 Summary: [12 regression] Test case gcc.dg/sso-9.c fails after r12-622 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100422] New: [12 regression] g++.dg/gomp/clause-3.C fails after r12-438

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100422 Bug ID: 100422 Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/gomp/clause-3.C fails after r12-438 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100407] New: New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 Bug ID: 100407 Summary: New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/100397] New: New test case libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 fails erratically since its introduction in r12-20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100397 Bug ID: 100397 Summary: New test case libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 fails erratically since its introduction in r12-20 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/100346] [11 regression] printf tests fail after r11-6755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100346 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It was failing with binutils 2.27 (I believe, it was the distro one) and when I switched to binutils 2.36.1 it works.

[Bug testsuite/100364] New: New test case gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/cdivchkld.c in r12-228 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100364 Bug ID: 100364 Summary: New test case gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/cdivchkld.c in r12-228 fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100346] New: [11 regression] printf tests fail after r11-6755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100346 Bug ID: 100346 Summary: [11 regression] printf tests fail after r11-6755 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/100338] [11/12 regression] Python error running test case after r11-2720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100338 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- On a system where things fail (Ubuntu 20.04.1): Python 2.7.18 GNU gdb (GDB) 11.0.50.20201107-git On a working system (Ubuntu 18.04.5): Python 2.7.17 GNU gdb (Ubuntu 8.1.1-0ubuntu1) 8.1.1

[Bug other/100338] New: [11 regression] Python error running test case after r11-2720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100338 Bug ID: 100338 Summary: [11 regression] Python error running test case after r11-2720 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/100327] [12 regression] bootstrap failure after r12-228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100327 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Build||powerpc64*-linux-gnu

[Bug bootstrap/100327] New: [12 regression] bootstrap failure after r12-228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100327 Bug ID: 100327 Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap failure after r12-228 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/100276] New: [12 regression] Many failures after r12-119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100276 Bug ID: 100276 Summary: [12 regression] Many failures after r12-119 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/98678] 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc execution test FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98678 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/100071] Test case libgomp.fortran/alloc-2.F90 fails with invalid memory reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100071 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks for the fix. Any idea why it failed in the weird way it did? I ran it dozens of times and it only failed and then every time when the 64 bit test run was done a second time?

[Bug testsuite/100073] New: [11 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr86058.c fails after r11-

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100073 Bug ID: 100073 Summary: [11 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr86058.c fails after r11- Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100071] New: Test case libgomp.fortran/alloc-2.F90 fails with invalid memory reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100071 Bug ID: 100071 Summary: Test case libgomp.fortran/alloc-2.F90 fails with invalid memory reference Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/100052] New: [11 regression] ICE in compiling g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052 Bug ID: 100052 Summary: [11 regression] ICE in compiling g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/99983] [10 regression] ICE in bootstrap while building libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99983 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64*-linux-gnu

[Bug bootstrap/99983] New: [10 regression] ICE in bootstrap while building libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99983 Bug ID: 99983 Summary: [10 regression] ICE in bootstrap while building libstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/99605] [11 regression] new test case g++.dg/modules/builtin-3_a.C fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99605 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #18 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils I use on there is (GNU Binutils) 2.23.52.20130522

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Swapping out those two .o files (individually and together) didn't yield a successful build. I brought in the 8.4.0 .o files in one at a time and eventually I got a successful build but at that

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is during stage1 and I was able to recreate using the system distro compiler, gcc version 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973] (SUSE Linux). I will bisect on the .o's now. FWIW here is a

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I will try to recreate but I got rid of the old build compiler. It was a leftover from some work many years ago and I had forgotten I was even using it.

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/99920] New: [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 Bug ID: 99920 Summary: [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug target/99648] [11 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr71522.c fails starting with r11-165 for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99648 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Which RTL do you want to see?

[Bug target/99648] [11 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr71522.c fails starting with r11-165 for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99648 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The assembler isn't that long so here it is (from -Os): .file "pr71522.c" .machine power8 .section".text" .section

[Bug other/99496] [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_c.C ICEs after r11-7557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/91799] [10/11 regression] r273245 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr88233.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91799 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug other/99796] New: gfortran.dg/class_assign_4.f90 fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99796 Bug ID: 99796 Summary: gfortran.dg/class_assign_4.f90 fails for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/77691] [8/9/10/11 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/99718] New: [11 regression] ICE in new test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr98914.c for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99718 Bug ID: 99718 Summary: [11 regression] ICE in new test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr98914.c for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/99685] New: gcc.target/powerpc/divkc3-1.c and mulkc3-1.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99685 Bug ID: 99685 Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/divkc3-1.c and mulkc3-1.c fails for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99655] [11 regression] Lots of ICEs in g++.dg/torture/pr85013.C after r11-7723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99655 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc64*-linux-gnu

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >