https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
13 is affected too at least, I'm pretty sure, but I can't check right now. Just
needs checking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113211
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113136
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Can you try with --enable-checking=yes,rtl,extra? I can reproduce this on
godbolt too: https://godbolt.org/z/56r9ejMn5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80130
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
I filed a bug for tysan: PR113151.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113151
Bug ID: 113151
Summary: Need for a TBAA / strict aliasing sanitizer (TySan)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113146
Bug ID: 113146
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building dialog
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113145
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56945
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56945=edit
reduced.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113145
Bug ID: 113145
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building mit-krb5-1.21.2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56943
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56943=edit
reduced.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56942
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56942=edit
tarfn.i.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
Bug ID: 113144
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building dpkg-1.21.15 in
verify_dominators (error: dominator of 9 should be 48,
not 12)
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113140
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Could you try ro tun that failing command again with -save-temps appended, and
then upload qv4qobjectwrapper.ii? It should be somewhere in the builddir.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113139
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56939
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56939=edit
reduced.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113139
Bug ID: 113139
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building Binutils
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113137
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56937
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56937=edit
reduced.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113137
Bug ID: 113137
Summary: [14 regression] Failed bootstrap with -O3
-march=znver2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113135
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> Created attachment 56934 [details]
> reduced.ii
>
> Reduced.
Interestingly, it seems to ICE as C++, not as C.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113136
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56935
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56935=edit
reduced.i
Reduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113135
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56934
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56934=edit
reduced.ii
Reduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113136
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56933
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56933=edit
toke.i.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113136
Bug ID: 113136
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building Perl
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113135
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
'g++ -O3 -march=znver2 -c unpack.ii' is enough to repro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113135
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56932
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56932=edit
unpack.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113135
Bug ID: 113135
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building unrar (error: PHI
node with wrong VUSE on edge from BB 46)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110899
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Any progress with the bisection?
sorry, not yet. I've been away from the computer mostly for an emergency.
I did make a start, but I got frustrated with how the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113050
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110934
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-08-07 00:00:00 |2023-12-20
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113056
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #8)
> for the pkg build (original report): no
> for the quick test I did earlier: yes because I was rushing, oops
/tmp/build $ ~/git/gcc/configure --prefix=/tmp/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
Bug ID: 113059
Summary: [14 regression] fftw fails tests for -O3 -m32
-march=znver2 since r14-6210-ge44ed92dbbe9d4
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113056
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
for the pkg build (original report): no
for the quick test I did earlier: yes because I was rushing, oops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113056
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
ftr (given I only gave a packaged build log) repro'd with ./configure
--prefix=/tmp/gcc --enable-languages=c,c++,rust --enable-multilib
--with-multilib-list=m32,m64 --with-checking=yes,extra,rtl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113056
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56898
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56898=edit
build.log.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113056
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56897
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56897=edit
config.log (libgrust)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113056
Bug ID: 113056
Summary: [14 regression] Build failure in libgrust
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80755
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113054
Bug ID: 113054
Summary: [14 regressions] ODR warnings when building new SCCP
pass
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113050
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Yeah, for every attempt I had to reconstruct it manually, I just got the
expected -Wdiscarded-qualifiers, and then realised it was atomic-specific.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113050
Bug ID: 113050
Summary: -Wincompatible-pointer-types emitted as a warning, not
an error, for __atomic_load
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80130
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113013
Bug ID: 113013
Summary: [12/13/14 regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc with
-fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113012
Bug ID: 113012
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building xorg-server with
-fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110273
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jens-Hanno Schwalm from comment #10)
> Hi, i think we found a very-similar issue in darktable code, you might look
> at
>
> https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pull/15742
>
If you're
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112907
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
-march isn't needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112907
Bug ID: 112907
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building Botan
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112859
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87299
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48026
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Gwenole Beauchesne from comment #5)
> Created attachment 56811 [details]
> Proposed patch against trunk
>
> Here is a proposed patch against trunk, which includes a fix for PR
> preprocessor/87299
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48026
Bug 48026 depends on bug 41201, which changed state.
Bug 41201 Summary: #pragma GCC target ("sse2") doesn't alter __SSE2__ in C++
(as it does in C)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||87299
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112856
Bug ID: 112856
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building clustal-omega
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111678
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109689
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
*** Bug 111678 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112856
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112856
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
reduced C version:
```
double *SVD_A_0;
int SVD_i, SVD_j, SVD_k, SVD_n;
double SVD_f;
void SVD() {
SVD_i = SVD_n - 1;
for (; SVD_i; SVD_i--) {
for (; SVD_j; SVD_j++) {
SVD_f = SVD_k = SVD_i;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572
--- Comment #32 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #30)
> afaik the best we have so far is
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112613#c0
we also know that pipewire fails a test (test-filter) when built for -m32,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pan2.li at intel dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
that's in my bisect range, yeah, got a few steps to go..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112836
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Thanks for chasing this down. This has been driving me nuts for a while but I
hadn't dug into it yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112789
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> Sounds like that HPC QCD app is broken. You should report it to the
> developers. Also since __builtin_ctzg is added, adding __builtin_ctzs really
> does not make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112823
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112823
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
At some point, I think we should consider using formal Fixes: git trailers or
something to help find missed backports, but that's another story.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112823
Bug ID: 112823
Summary: -Wincompatible-pointer-types errors in
libiberty/simple-object-mach-o.c (missing backport for
gcc-11)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56766
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56766=edit
reduced.i
cvise just finished here with this, not massaged it by hand though
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
Bug ID: 112818
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building accel-ppp (error:
conversion of register to a different size in
‘view_convert_expr’, verify_gimple failed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82919
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
Bug 44209 depends on bug 106537, which changed state.
Bug 106537 Summary: GCC doesn't support -W[no-]compare-distinct-pointer-types
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106537
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106537
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108224
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111400
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to David Brown from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #3)
> > You already have -W[error=]return-type.
>
> Yes, and that is what I normally use - I am a big fan of gcc's static
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||108476, 85678
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106416
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91092
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56747
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56747=edit
another cvised testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/Juniper/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56744
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56744=edit
reduced.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112640
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Does gentoo has a patch which adds __builtin_ctzs ?
No, nothing like that. Here's what this one was built with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
Bug ID: 112793
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal
compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at
tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572
--- Comment #30 from Sam James ---
afaik the best we have so far is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112613#c0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111922
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
I suspect I've just hit this when trying to build pixman on s390x too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112741
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112701
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #51 from Sam James ---
manolis, did you have a chance to look at the remaining pass issue? You'll need
to revert Dave's commit locally which made the issue latent for building
Python.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112717
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
No warning from -Wlto-type-mismatch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112443
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109811
--- Comment #16 from Sam James ---
Thank you all for the effort.
501 - 600 of 1064 matches
Mail list logo
