[Bug target/32457] [4.3 Regression] Complete program optimized away (i686, -ftree-vectorize)

2007-06-22 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 20:20 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Complete program optimized away (i686, -ftree-vectorize) Do you still need the stuff mentioned in comment #7 or not? I would guess not. No, I'm debugging that on an amd64. Thanks

[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold

2007-06-21 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 08:21 --- Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold On 6/21/07, Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The fold_binary change looks unnecessary. ok. The rest is ok

[Bug tree-optimization/19590] IVs with the same evolution not eliminated

2007-06-21 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 17:06 --- Subject: Bug 19590 Author: spop Date: Thu Jun 21 17:06:05 2007 New Revision: 125925 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125925 Log: PR tree-optimization/19590 * tree-vrp.c

[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold

2007-06-21 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #26 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 18:21 --- Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold Just to sum it up, and for asking for advice, attached is the patch that I'm bootstrapping and testing now. Another thing

[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold

2007-06-21 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #29 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 20:55 --- Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold So, the last patch bootstrapped, and tests passed with exactly the same fails as on trunk. I'm going to commit that patch

[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold

2007-06-21 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #30 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 21:25 --- Subject: Bug 20623 Author: spop Date: Thu Jun 21 21:25:27 2007 New Revision: 125929 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125929 Log: PR middle-end/20623 * tree.h (debug_fold_checksum

[Bug target/32457] [4.3 Regression] Complete program optimized away (i686, -ftree-vectorize)

2007-06-21 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 21:38 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Complete program optimized away (i686, -ftree-vectorize) Thanks for pointing me to this bug. I'll have a look. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32457

[Bug tree-optimization/32075] can't determine dependence between p-a[x+i] and p-a[x+i+1] where x is invariant but defined in the function

2007-06-20 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 16:57 --- Subject: Re: can't determine dependence between p-a[x+i] and p-a[x+i+1] where x is invariant but defined in the function The problem has been introduced in version 124927. @@ -3182,7 +3182,7

[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold

2007-06-20 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 18:50 --- (In reply to comment #5) This depends on PR 22455 now as --enable-checking=fold is broken. With -- spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold

2007-06-20 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 22:58 --- Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold Hi, The following patch fixes a part of the reported testsuite fails. With this patch we avoid folding the TREE_CHAIN

[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold

2007-06-20 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 23:31 --- Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold Hi, here is the final fix for the remaining cases, closing this PR. Okay for trunk after bootntest on i686-linux with default

[Bug tree-optimization/32075] can't determine dependence between p-a[x+i] and p-a[x+i+1] where x is invariant but defined in the function

2007-06-20 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 23:42 --- Subject: Bug 32075 Author: spop Date: Wed Jun 20 23:42:28 2007 New Revision: 125900 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125900 Log: PR tree-optimization/32075 * tree-data-ref.c

[Bug tree-optimization/32075] can't determine dependence between p-a[x+i] and p-a[x+i+1] where x is invariant but defined in the function

2007-06-20 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 23:45 --- Subject: Bug 32075 Author: spop Date: Wed Jun 20 23:44:56 2007 New Revision: 125901 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125901 Log: PR tree-optimization/32075 * tree-data-ref.c

[Bug tree-optimization/32367] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:113

2007-06-19 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-19 18:35 --- Subject: Bug 32367 Author: spop Date: Tue Jun 19 18:35:39 2007 New Revision: 125855 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125855 Log: PR tree-optimization/32367 * tree-chrec.h

[Bug tree-optimization/32367] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:113

2007-06-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 13:38 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:113 {{BinomialCoefficients[0], +, 4}_1, +, {0, +, 4}_1}_1 does not look good: the left part should be invariant

[Bug tree-optimization/32367] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:113

2007-06-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 19:13 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:113 The ptrplus patch contains the following code: *** interpret_rhs_modify_stmt (struct loop

[Bug tree-optimization/32367] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:113

2007-06-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 19:16 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:113 Ok, thanks. Just to let people know, {{BinomialCoefficients[0], +, 4}_1, +, {0, +, 4}_1}_1 was also showing up

[Bug tree-optimization/25371] -ftree-vectorize results in internal compiler error on AMD64

2007-05-10 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 08:24 --- Subject: Re: -ftree-vectorize results in internal compiler error on AMD64 I was still thinking about how to fix this, and the solution seems to me to not instantiate the initial value of the induction variable

[Bug tree-optimization/25371] -ftree-vectorize results in internal compiler error on AMD64

2007-05-08 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-08 21:19 --- Subject: Re: -ftree-vectorize results in internal compiler error on AMD64 On 5/8/07, Sjodin, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, I looked at the code, and the problem is that we have to pass

[Bug tree-optimization/31756] Doesn't optimize the following (obvious) sequence

2007-04-29 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-29 16:21 --- Subject: Re: Doesn't optimize the following (obvious) sequence PRE optimized the offset and stride variables. SCEV doesn't know how to create an offset or step out of these optimized operations. I remember

[Bug tree-optimization/31343] ICE in data-refs dependence testing

2007-04-10 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-11 01:09 --- Subject: Bug 31343 Author: spop Date: Wed Apr 11 01:09:35 2007 New Revision: 123708 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123708 Log: PR tree-optimization/31343 * tree-chrec.h

[Bug tree-optimization/31183] ICE in int_cst_value, at tree.c:7684 with -O3 -ftree-loop-linear

2007-03-16 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 11:30 --- Subject: Bug 31183 Author: spop Date: Fri Mar 16 11:30:48 2007 New Revision: 122988 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122988 Log: PR tree-optimization/31183 * tree-loop-linear.c

[Bug tree-optimization/25211] [4.1 Regression] verify_ssa ICE with -Os -ftree-loop-linear

2006-08-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 13:14 --- Subject: Bug 25211 Author: spop Date: Thu Aug 17 13:14:26 2006 New Revision: 116223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116223 Log: PR middle-end/25211 PR middle-end/20256 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/26435] [4.1 regression] ICE with -O1 -ftree-loop-linear and higher optimization

2006-08-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 13:14 --- Subject: Bug 26435 Author: spop Date: Thu Aug 17 13:14:26 2006 New Revision: 116223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116223 Log: PR middle-end/25211 PR middle-end/20256 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/20256] Perfect nest transformation not conservative enough

2006-08-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 13:14 --- Subject: Bug 20256 Author: spop Date: Thu Aug 17 13:14:26 2006 New Revision: 116223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116223 Log: PR middle-end/25211 PR middle-end/20256 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/27745] ICE in execute_todo with -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

2006-05-29 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 16:01 --- Subject: Bug 27745 Author: spop Date: Mon May 29 16:01:16 2006 New Revision: 114205 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114205 Log: PR middle-end/27745 * lambda-code.c (perfect_nestify

[Bug tree-optimization/27332] [4.2 Regression] ICE in try_interchange_loops with -ftree-loop-linear

2006-05-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 12:47 --- Subject: Bug 27332 Author: spop Date: Wed May 17 12:47:43 2006 New Revision: 113856 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113856 Log: PR middle-end/27332 * tree-loop-linear.c

[Bug tree-optimization/26435] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with -O1 -ftree-loop-linear and higher optimization

2006-05-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 14:26 --- Subject: Bug 26435 Author: spop Date: Wed May 17 14:25:59 2006 New Revision: 113862 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113862 Log: PR middle-end/20256 PR middle-end/26435

[Bug tree-optimization/20256] Perfect nest transformation not conservative enough

2006-05-17 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 14:26 --- Subject: Bug 20256 Author: spop Date: Wed May 17 14:25:59 2006 New Revision: 113862 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113862 Log: PR middle-end/20256 PR middle-end/26435

[Bug middle-end/26996] interpret_rhs_modify_expr calls fold_convert (vector_type, -1)

2006-04-05 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-05 12:33 --- Subject: Bug 26996 Author: spop Date: Wed Apr 5 12:33:06 2006 New Revision: 112700 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112700 Log: PR tree-optimization/26996 * tree-scalar-evolution.c

[Bug middle-end/26996] interpret_rhs_modify_expr calls fold_convert (vector_type, -1)

2006-04-05 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-05 17:25 --- Subject: Bug 26996 Author: spop Date: Wed Apr 5 17:25:26 2006 New Revision: 112711 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112711 Log: PR tree-optimization/26996 * tree-scalar-evolution.c

[Bug tree-optimization/26992] [4.2 Regression] Internal Compiler Error in dwarf2out.c:7607 build_polynomial_chrec

2006-04-03 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-03 09:59 --- Subject: Bug 26992 Author: spop Date: Mon Apr 3 09:59:38 2006 New Revision: 112635 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112635 Log: PR bootstrap/26992 * tree-scalar-evolution.c

[Bug tree-optimization/26939] loop number of iterations analysis confused by what PRE did (PRE is doing its job)

2006-04-02 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-02 14:08 --- Subject: Bug 26939 Author: spop Date: Sun Apr 2 14:08:02 2006 New Revision: 112623 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112623 Log: PR tree-optimization/26939 * tree-chrec.c

[Bug tree-optimization/26859] [4.2 Regression] ICE Segmentation Fault

2006-03-29 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 17:20 --- Subject: Bug 26859 Author: spop Date: Wed Mar 29 17:20:24 2006 New Revision: 112502 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112502 Log: PR tree-optimization/26859 * tree-ssa-loop-niter.c

<    3   4   5   6   7   8